![]() |
Originally Posted by kenaisteve
I remember right after 9/11 that the security wait time was hour(s), but people adapted and 6 months later the wait times decreased to 15-30 minutes, and recently it would take no more than 15 minutes except during rush hour.
My guess is that people will again adapt and that in a few months it will again drop to "reasonable" levels, maybe not 15 minutes again, but possibly 30 minutes. |
I've already modified my behavior...I won't fly out of LAX unless absolutely necessary. Security lines before this happened were verging on 1.5 - 2 hours in some terminals there. The local news just showed people queuing up at 5:30 in the morning...they have been waiting in line outside the terminal for an hour and still haven't made it in, meaning the security line there is likely 2-3 hours.
I'm actually wondering if this will make things better -- most people they interviewed said they were not going to fly anymore (although their reasons largely weren't because of the lines, it was because they were afraid to fly). |
Originally Posted by johnep1
Do you really believe lines will be 3-4 hours long from now on? Just because some journalist makes something up doesn't mean it's true.
|
Much like shortly after 9/11, journalists are speculating like there's no tomorrow. I dont think you need to dig very hard to find these very same predictions of 4 hour security being "the norm" just 4.5 years ago.
The travel industry is a very large lobby, with a lot of $$$. Don't think they're willing to see their industry be destroyed by 4 hour security waits. |
Originally Posted by Dave8481
I just saw a live broadcast from O'Hare on CNBC and the reporter said the security lines were moving actually quite quickly and that things were running pretty much on time so far this morning...I haven't tried confirming this, but that is the word on CNBC.
|
Hogwash. It's temporary. I don't think it's going to be a matter of adapting, but many of these security measures will go away. If we reach the point where you can't take a watch on a flight, we're all toast. Nobody will stand for that, not even the apologists.
I went through security at SAN yesterday in 10 minutes. I was "scared," got to the airport 2 1/2 hours early, and spent 2 hours and 20 minutes in the RCC. |
Originally Posted by redbeard911
Hogwash. It's temporary. I don't think it's going to be a matter of adapting, but many of these security measures will go away. If we reach the point where you can't take a watch on a flight, we're all toast. Nobody will stand for that, not even the apologists.
I went through security at SAN yesterday in 10 minutes. I was "scared," got to the airport 2 1/2 hours early, and spent 2 hours and 20 minutes in the RCC. Wouldn't 3-4 hour waits be the end of most non-major-metro area airports' service? |
I know I would pressure my job to eliminate travel, much as I enjoy having subsidized flying from them.
Leisure trips that were drivable would go away. I would also no longer make MRs. And no long-distance trips that are for less than a week in duration (i.e. no three or four-day weekends on transcons, etc.) Unfortunately, there will be plenty of Ma and Pa Kettles who simply walk down the well-traveled corridors into the valley of steel like the sheep they are and who will complain but say, "Well, at least it makes us safe." |
Originally Posted by Buster
I've already modified my behavior...I won't fly out of LAX unless absolutely necessary. Security lines before this happened were verging on 1.5 - 2 hours in some terminals there. The local news just showed people queuing up at 5:30 in the morning...they have been waiting in line outside the terminal for an hour and still haven't made it in, meaning the security line there is likely 2-3 hours.
I'm actually wondering if this will make things better -- most people they interviewed said they were not going to fly anymore (although their reasons largely weren't because of the lines, it was because they were afraid to fly). Im at LAX now. I arrived a little bit ago from Sydney. I had a 75 minute connection and had it changed in Sydney after hearing about LAX issues. Got here and the only real wait was for my bag. Customs and immigration was smooth. Security at LAX was less than 5 minutes. Dont know about check in since i got my boarding pass in SYD. Likewise SYD was smooth. I got there early and they were waiting with printed instructions on the new rules. I put any liquids in my suitcase and checked it. They were strict about one carry on. They did a secondary screening at the gate. They called the flight in the RCC about 90 minutes before departure for business class. Everyone got researched by hand at the gate. Both people and bags. But they had 8 or 10 people doing the searches and even on a sold out 744 it wasnt a bad wait. Time will tell of course but there does seem to be some reasonable decisions and accomadations being made all around at the moment. My only issue is that my contact lenses sure could have used some rewetting solution after 14 hours. Pulled it out after customs and put some in my eyes and then back in the bag before rechecking it. |
If the line takes 5 minutes but I still have to remove my shoes, cannot have liquids/gels and might get gate-harassed, then I will not fly. :td:
|
8 minutes at PIT
No lines at checkin counter (Preferred)
Lines was 4 people deep at the regular desk - wait time 1 minute. Checkin and baggage check = 2 minutes. No line at TSA bag drop Walk to bag drop, drop bag and leave = 1 minute Elite line at security had 2 people (with a baby) in front Getting past ID checker = 1 minute (because of family in front) Second in line for screening Removal of shoes ( :mad: ), laptop ( :rolleyes: ) etc. = 2 minutes WTMD, boarding pass check and gather up stuff = 1 minute 8 minutes - on my way. This was at 2:15 P.M. on Friday. |
Originally Posted by redbeard911
...I went through security at SAN yesterday in 10 minutes. I was "scared," got to the airport 2 1/2 hours early, and spent 2 hours and 20 minutes in the RCC.
LOL - same here. Got here at 2:15 for a 5:55 departure (not entirely due to expectation of long wait - I got done with business early). Took only 8 minutes from the time I walked up to the counter till I was boarding the transit. Entered US Club at 2:30. First time I've appreciated that they charge for drinks or for sure, they'd have denied me boarding later tonight. :D |
Originally Posted by catocony
Thats probably because every business traveler who could canceled their flights so they wouldn't have to deal with the silliness.
|
Originally Posted by Lehava
Did you hurt yourself leaping the grand canyon on that one? I think you will find the number of business travellers who cancelled flights are a SMALL minority and those who pondered the idea isnt too many more. Most of us are used to the up and down of travel and roll with it, not to mention if we dont travel we dont get paid. I booked 3 new flights today...sure not sitting in a corner running scared or to avoid packing smarter.
The overwhelming majority of people on this board agree with the person you just tried to troll. Please, kindly do us a favor and go join the TSA. |
Originally Posted by kenaisteve
I remember right after 9/11 that the security wait time was hour(s), but people adapted and 6 months later the wait times decreased to 15-30 minutes, and recently it would take no more than 15 minutes except during rush hour.
My guess is that people will again adapt and that in a few months it will again drop to "reasonable" levels, maybe not 15 minutes again, but possibly 30 minutes. The terrorists are MUCH smarter than GWB and the rest of the fools saying this is "for safety" |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.