Cool Airport Security Technology - LGW

Old Jan 10, 2006, 9:02 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LYS
Programs: FB Gold, HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 37
Thumbs up Cool Airport Security Technology - LGW

I saw a very cool security procedure in action last night at LGW. As in all airports you show your passport and boarding pass before having yourself and carry-on luggage screened. What I saw for the first time was an electronic record made of the face of the person (me) who was passing through main security. I was directed to look at a small camera, my photo was taken, and a barcoded sticker was attached to the back of my boarding pass!

When I got to just before the gate, the barcode was scanned (obviously an encoding of my photo), my photo popped up on the checker's monitor screen, and I was OK for the gate area (for an internal UK flight).

Is this a pilot procedure at LGW? I flew through LHR just before Christmas and didn't see this snazzy bit of business in operation then.

Would love to hear from any other flyertalkers who have seen this in action!
portiaeliot is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 9:07 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Sounds like just more revenue protection for the airlines, yet not providing any additional security.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 10:14 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,008
Nothing cool about it. An invasive and silly process which offers no security benefit, but continues the 'theater' aspect of airport security while, as the last poster mentioned, ensures the ticketed pax was the person flying.

I am fairly confident that such a process, if enabled here, would elicit howls of protest from everyone except the worst brand of 'sheeple'.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 10:45 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Programs: UA GS, AA PLT, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,437
I guess it depends on what they are doing with the photo in the time between the security screening and the gate boarding. If nothing is being done with it at all, then it is a farce, and nothing more than revenue protection. If however, they are using it against a database of known bad guys, then this may be somewhat effective in capturing bad guys. (this can be either the really bad guys or the guy who is wanted for something less than really bad). I don't know what I really think of it, given the number of cameras floating around these days. Don't really have a privacy arguement here, and this method may reduce the number of false positves that come out of facial recognition. Just my thoughts.
MSY-MSP is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 10:48 am
  #5  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,946
Not cool.

Completely unnecessary procedure that adds nothing to security.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 10:54 am
  #6  
Ambassador: World of Hyatt
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK - the nearest airport is named after a motorway !
Posts: 4,218
Actually, it's used because in LGW international and domestic passengers mix freely after security.

As you do not need to have photo ID for domestic flights (in the UK), they use the digital photos to make sure that you're the same person getting on the plane who went through security (no need to show photo ID on boarding).

Quite what purpose this serves, no-one ever explained to me...
Stewie Mac is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 11:05 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,238
Originally Posted by portiaeliot
When I got to just before the gate, the barcode was scanned (obviously an encoding of my photo), my photo popped up on the checker's monitor screen, and I was OK for the gate area (for an internal UK flight).
Just for clarification, the barcode is not an encoding of your photo. The barcode number is associated with the photo that is stored as a file on their computer. Scanning the barcode is just another way of retrieving the file. Cruise ships do this when you embark/disembark at the ports of call. They just use your room key instead of a barcode.
justhere is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 11:10 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
This smacks of big brother. I would wonder where that information is going! I know when we signed up for TSA our photo went into a database and we were told that it was going to be used in photo recognition software development.
eyecue is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 11:37 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: BAEC Gold, Delta Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, AMEX Platinum (US)
Posts: 18,485
Cool, I don't think so, dumb yes. I've flown through LGW a number of times this previous year and just found it plain annoying. The first time I had it done there was a booth where two agents were scanning the barcodes however one of them went on break and the other decided to lock themselves out of the system. Meanwhile close to 200 people and growing were coming to this area to board their aircraft coming down moving walkways to find they couldn't get off, people were falling over and it was a REAL mess! After about 15mins of hanging around one of the guys got off the phone and logged back into his system and were getting people through in a trickle motion.

Seems utterly useless to me.
Fraser is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 11:52 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brighton England
Programs: AA Plat, various hotels
Posts: 1,220
Originally Posted by StewieMac
Actually, it's used because in LGW international and domestic passengers mix freely after security.

As you do not need to have photo ID for domestic flights (in the UK), they use the digital photos to make sure that you're the same person getting on the plane who went through security (no need to show photo ID on boarding).

Quite what purpose this serves, no-one ever explained to me...
The purpose behind it used to be that domestic passengers could mix with people arriving from "dirty" countries. Since LGW has now completed the segregation of arriving international passengers, and the new domestic arrivals baggage belt is also sgregated from departing passengers (in case someone opened up a suitcase and handed over something like scissors to a departing passenger) there seems to be liitle point in keeping the system.
Gatwick Alan is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 4:31 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 186
Originally Posted by LessO2
Sounds like just more revenue protection for the airlines, yet not providing any additional security.
except for making the security lines move ever more slower!!!
levy is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 4:43 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mid Wales
Programs: BA back down to Blue, PC Plat
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Gatwick Alan
The purpose behind it used to be that domestic passengers could mix with people arriving from "dirty" countries. Since LGW has now completed the segregation of arriving international passengers, and the new domestic arrivals baggage belt is also sgregated from departing passengers (in case someone opened up a suitcase and handed over something like scissors to a departing passenger) there seems to be liitle point in keeping the system.
I agree with this - I suspect that the system once had real value but although maybe now it doesn't, any perceived security downgrading would be politically unacceptable in the current climate. I use Gatwick all the time and I can't think of a bad scenario that this would prevent.

Having said that, I have never been held up by the system and I think fbgdavidson was rather unlucky in his experience.

The downside for pax is potentially in dom-dom transfers; not that many of them at LGW but you'd not be able to use the lounges without going landside and back in to get photographed.
NSFU is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2006, 10:05 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: BAEC Gold, Delta Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, AMEX Platinum (US)
Posts: 18,485
Originally Posted by NSFU
Having said that, I have never been held up by the system and I think fbgdavidson was rather unlucky in his experience
Admittedly that was only the once, the other times it was fine, other than having to get my photo taken at 5.15am in the morning that is

The problem I experienced wouldn't have existed without the system though...
Fraser is offline  
Old Jan 13, 2006, 9:54 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 132
Funny that people here would complain about having their photo taken, but cheer the individual that took a picture of the alleged FAM playing a game and posted it for the world to see.
fester is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2006, 5:31 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mid Wales
Programs: BA back down to Blue, PC Plat
Posts: 684
I think there is a point to this, after all

Arriving at LGW yesterday from AMS I realised why they have to do this. If they didn't - given the way things are set up - arriving international pax could bypass immigration.

What you would do is arrive on your international flight having arranged to hold two 'onward' boarding cards: one for an international connection and another for a domestic. Then you would go through international connections (which deposits you back airside) using your international boarding card, and use your domestic one to get on a domestic flight, and never face passport control. The need for a barcode/photo to get to the domestic gate stops you doing this.
NSFU is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.