Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Did Air Marshal Endanger United Passengers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2014, 4:41 pm
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
Post Did Air Marshal Endanger United Passengers?

According to NBC, after the attack with unknown substance, the Marshal boarded a United international flight.

An on-duty Federal Air Marshal was stabbed with a syringe containing an unknown substance at the airport in Lagos, Nigeria, on Sunday — then boarded a flight and flew to Houston, the FBI and TSA announced Monday.

The marshal was not severely injured by the needle prick, but it was unclear if it contained any hazardous or viral substances. The FBI said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "conducted an on-scene screening of the victim when United Flight 143 landed in Houston early Monday morning."
How could they know if he was injected with a contagious disease or not?
flyinbob is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 5:00 pm
  #2  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Sources told NBC Houston affiliate KPRC that "a group of federal agents in plain clothes were about to walk through security at the Lagos airport Sunday when they were approached by a group of men. Sources say one of them stabbed a needle into an agent's arm and then they all ran away." The agent then pulled the needle out, and then stored it in a safe container, the sources said.

This part really bothers me as the FAM not only knew he was stabbed with a syringe but he still took the flight as opposed to immediately seeking medical attention
goalie is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 5:04 pm
  #3  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Sooooo selfish. What a creep.
Ari is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 5:15 pm
  #4  
DEN
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Golden, CO USA
Programs: UA 1K 2MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 764
Originally Posted by flyinbob
According to NBC, after the attack with unknown substance, the Marshal boarded a United international flight.



How could they know if he was injected with a contagious disease or not?
This situation is frightening, not only to the FAM who was exposed to an unknown substance, but to an entire aircraft full of passengers and crew.

I have compassion for the FAM and the need to quickly get him checked-out, but not at the risk of all those on the aircraft, who, presumably, were not informed of the incident at the time and given a option not to board.

This seems a serious breach of aircraft security and a potential public health threat that should not have been allowed to happen.

“The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few” applies here, I believe.


Addition: Just saw this on the NBC Nightly News, basically quoting the KPRC report.

DEN

Last edited by DEN; Sep 8, 2014 at 5:41 pm
DEN is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 6:02 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Orange County, CA (SNA)
Programs: Delta - PM , MM; Hilton - Diamond, Marriott - Peon
Posts: 911
To be honest, I think I would have done the same thing. I would have been scared and worried, but since whatever the substance was did not kill me or immediately have some symptoms (wasn’t a toxin), if it was any type of disease (hello Ebola??) it would take several days surely to reach the point where I would be infectious. (No, I am not a doctor and that previous statement is only my reasoning, true or false I would not know for sure).

I would have reported it immediately on arrival and headed for a hospital.

I would not have wanted to put my trust in the Nigerian health system, no matter how good in practice it may be.

Maybe he was following SOP (if there are any for this situation?)
tanglin is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 6:14 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Agreed--few diseases manifest fast enough to be a threat during the flight.

On the other hand, by not taking it perhaps that was the objective--get the FAM off the flight to attack it.

Last edited by essxjay; Sep 29, 2014 at 11:44 am
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 6:21 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues & San Francisco
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,001
please confine comments to those of a PRACTICAL nature

thanks so much
squeakr

co Mod TS/S
squeakr is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 6:27 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
Originally Posted by goalie
This part really bothers me as the FAM not only knew he was stabbed with a syringe but he still took the flight as opposed to immediately seeking medical attention
I just hope this leads to a written policy REQUIRING any such incidents to be immediately reported and the person isolated until medically released.
flyinbob is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 7:09 pm
  #9  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Winner! ^ tho I would add that it must be "publicly" reported as if reported internally, we'll never know what danger (potential or real) there was as it will be quashed due to "national security" and that imho is just as bad as the FAM being allowed to work the flight after being stabbed with the syringe

Last edited by essxjay; Sep 29, 2014 at 11:45 am
goalie is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 8:45 pm
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Does the country have an involuntary yellow fever vaccine when unable to provide vaccination documentation and not willing to bribe the health officials there?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014, 12:16 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,540
per this report:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...lagos-airport/

The State Department responded to the airport to assist the air marshal and his team.

"After consultation with the consulate and physicians, the [federal air marshal] was given precautionary medication," according to the alert...

...An FBI spokesman said Monday night, "out of an abundance of caution, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted an on-scene screening of the victim when United Flight 143 landed in Houston early Monday morning
and this:
The air marshal was quarantined and screened for Ebola on-scene
He was allowed to board the United Airlines flight he was booked on for Houston


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3CnSFSesm
and before someone goes on the FoxNews or Daily Mail rant, there are other sources these were just the fastest to find any quote after I read it on Italian news sites.
FlyingHoustonian is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014, 12:20 am
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by tanglin
To be honest, I think I would have done the same thing. I would have been scared and worried, but since whatever the substance was did not kill me or immediately have some symptoms (wasn’t a toxin), if it was any type of disease (hello Ebola??) it would take several days surely to reach the point where I would be infectious. (No, I am not a doctor and that previous statement is only my reasoning, true or false I would not know for sure)
Just reading about this stuff for something related to work: Average of 21 hours for ebola to incubate. Most of the really nasty things take at least that long. Depending on the timing of the flights it would/might have been perfectly safe to fly.
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014, 5:05 am
  #13  
DEN
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Golden, CO USA
Programs: UA 1K 2MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 764
An FBI spokesman said Monday night, "out of an abundance of caution, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted an on-scene screening of the victim when United Flight 143 landed in Houston early Monday morning."

Not allowing the FAM to fly would have been the safe move, at least for a few days. I wonder if the PIC was consulted and agreed to let the FAM fly?

I still believe there were too many unknowns at the departing airport for this bizarre situation to allow him to board that flight.

Would the same scenario have played out if it had been a passenger or a crew member?

DEN
DEN is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014, 10:18 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,659
This is a horrible and scary situation for the FAM but I fail to see how his being on the plane could be a risk to the other passengers. As has been mentioned upthread, illnesses take a while to incubate before a person is contagious. Even so, most serious illnesses require more than casual contact to be contagious.
FAA1996 is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014, 10:27 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Programs: AA EXP, Starwood Lifetime Plat (now Marriott Lifetime Titanium), Avis President's Club
Posts: 59
I wouldn't doubt it if someone did stab him with ebola in order to get the US to pay more attention to it, the idea being that if it affects the mainland, we will have to do something about it and that something may trickle down to west Africa.

I know a number of FAMs, and they go to Lagos pretty often, and i surely hope it wasn't any of them. Not that I wish such a thing on anyone, but I'm just looking out for my own people.
seanc724 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.