LA Times:TSA ends contract with Rapiscan, maker of full-body scanners
, or where they keep the single spaced typed list of J Edgar Hoover's enemies.
Jan 18, 2013, 10:05 am
#17
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
I would note that the statements above regarding allegedly "naked images" were made by the LA Times writer, not TSA itself. My guess is that TSA used its usual verbal judo to avoid saying the words "naked image", and the writer paraphrased into that form.
In short ... TSA still has plausible deniability on that issue.
In short ... TSA still has plausible deniability on that issue.
TSA will end a $5 million contract with OSI’s Rapiscan unit for the software after Administrator John Pistole concluded the company couldn’t meet a congressional deadline to produce generic passenger images, agency officials said in interviews.
The benefit of this whole farce is that it will not be politically possible, IMO, for a generation if not longer, to use machines of similar or even better technology on the public. The electronic strip search idea just won't fly. Since the think tanks studying this issue for the FAA knew the likely response of the American public as far back as the 1990's, it is unforgivable for TSA to have pulled this stunt in the face of every indication that it was not acceptable to the people. They tried to ram it down our throats by force because of the power they had.
Jan 18, 2013, 10:31 am
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
The benefit of this whole farce is that it will not be politically possible, IMO, for a generation if not longer, to use machines of similar or even better technology on the public. The electronic strip search idea just won't fly. Since the think tanks studying this issue for the FAA knew the likely response of the American public as far back as the 1990's, it is unforgivable for TSA to have pulled this stunt in the face of every indication that it was not acceptable to the people. They tried to ram it down our throats by force because of the power they had.
Jan 18, 2013, 11:20 am
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Are the x-ray machines not being replaced by MMW ones? Those are similar technology, assumed to be better by the DHS (since they're the surviving technology). Do they not also produce a naked image, just using the Gumby plug-in? IIRC, the naked image from the MMW came first, the plug-in some time later.
Any belief that TSA is not going to X-Ray the public before proving the safety of these devices is not well founded.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...-airports.html
TSA has contracted with L-3, Smiths Group Plc (SMIN) and American Science & Engineering Inc. (ASEI) for new body-image scanners, all of which must have privacy software. L-3 and Smiths used millimeter-wave technology. American Science uses backscatter.
Jan 18, 2013, 12:13 pm
#21
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 105
The effective date or rather deadline is June 2013.
It really sucks that TSA is sticking with backscatter. Even with replacing 60 backscatter with MMW, that still leaves over 100 backscatter through out the country.
Someone needs to start a whitehouse petition to have all backscatter tech removed from use in the United States.
It really sucks that TSA is sticking with backscatter. Even with replacing 60 backscatter with MMW, that still leaves over 100 backscatter through out the country.
Someone needs to start a whitehouse petition to have all backscatter tech removed from use in the United States.
Jan 18, 2013, 12:39 pm
#22
Suspended
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Just outside Big D, or many other places in big metal tubes
Programs: WN Rpd.Rwrds, AA, was longtime CO very top Elite tier, Overentitled UA Lifetime 1K (since 2012)
Posts: 1,334
TSA to remove X Ray scanners by June
Breaking news on Fox.com. This refers to removing the Body Scanners. I will return and add link to the story once it is online.
Link to story: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...port-scanners/
Link to story: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...port-scanners/
Last edited by mkr; Jan 18, 2013 at 1:39 pm Reason: clarify
Jan 18, 2013, 1:06 pm
#25
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,723
IMO even in the absence of safety concerns, TSA has no business using this sort of technology as primary screening on anyone unless the passenger volunteers (e.g., someone with a metal implant who prefers the body scanner to the WTMD might appreciate the option).
Jan 18, 2013, 1:07 pm
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,597
I'll be pleased to not have to stand next to a Chertoff Imager when I opt-out.. Still won't change the fact that I won't go through a NoS.
Jan 18, 2013, 1:10 pm
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,205
It could be worse. Tomorrow I'm planning to fly somewhere. If I get sent to the scanner and opt out, I can kiss my journey goodbye.
Jan 18, 2013, 1:37 pm
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Jan 18, 2013, 1:58 pm
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,205
In case you didn't notice my location, I will be flying from London, UK. Opting out is punishable by refusal of access to the sterile area.