Feds Ask for Vigilance on Trains Based on Info from Bin Laden Compound
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BOS
Programs: DL PM, Hertz Gold Plus, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,049
Feds Ask for Vigilance on Trains Based on Info from Bin Laden Compound
Not immediate, BTW. Supposedly happening on 9/11.
From NBC New York:
Feds Ask for Vigilance on Trains Based on Info from Bin Laden Compound
From NBC New York:
A government advisory sent Thursday says that as far back as February 2010, al-Qaida was contemplating "an operation against trains at an unspecified location in the United States on the 10th anniversary" of the 9/11 attacks.
One option, the advisory says, was trying to tip a train by tampering with the rails so that the train would fall off the track at either a valley or on a bridge. Such an attempt would probably only work once, the material in bin Laden's house said, because tilting or tampering with the rails would be spotted, the advisory says.
One option, the advisory says, was trying to tip a train by tampering with the rails so that the train would fall off the track at either a valley or on a bridge. Such an attempt would probably only work once, the material in bin Laden's house said, because tilting or tampering with the rails would be spotted, the advisory says.
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
If OBL were smart, he'd have created a bunch more dummy plots to be discovered ... all in order to get us to waste ever more money on mythical plots. As anyone with a brain should know, the country eagerly wastes money reacting to even failed attempts at who knows what (e.g. the "underwear bomber", the "shoe bomber", the "bottle bomber(s)" that didn't even have tickets, the "printer cartridge bomber", etc), so why not even more dummy plots.
He was about bleeding us financially -- in life and perhaps even in death -- after his effort to make isolationists out of Americans failed. Can't say that he's been a complete failure even in death.
It's not like the government is unable to waste a couple trillion dollars reacting to everything and nothing at all -- courtesy of the public's apathy, ignorance and/or paranoia. The TSA has never been satisfied with its budget being only as much as it is; nor has the TSA ever been satisfied with being restricted to passenger screening at airports.
He was about bleeding us financially -- in life and perhaps even in death -- after his effort to make isolationists out of Americans failed. Can't say that he's been a complete failure even in death.
It's not like the government is unable to waste a couple trillion dollars reacting to everything and nothing at all -- courtesy of the public's apathy, ignorance and/or paranoia. The TSA has never been satisfied with its budget being only as much as it is; nor has the TSA ever been satisfied with being restricted to passenger screening at airports.
Last edited by GUWonder; May 5, 2011 at 7:15 pm
#3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,007
If OBL were smart, he'd have created a bunch more dummy plots to be discovered ... all in order to get us to waste ever more money on mythical plots. As anyone with a brain should know, the country eagerly wastes money reacting to even failed attempts at who knows what (e.g. the "underwear bomber", the "shoe bomber", the "bottle bomber(s)" that didn't even have tickets, the "printer cartridge bomber", etc), so why not even more dummy plots.
He was about bleeding us financially -- in life and perhaps even in death -- after his effort to make isolationists out of Americans failed. Can't say that he's been a complete failure even in death.
It's not like the government is unable to waste a couple trillion dollars reacting to everything and nothing at all -- courtesy of the public's apathy, ignorance and/or paranoia. The TSA has never been satisfied with its budget being only as much as it is; nor has the TSA ever been satisfied with being restricted to passenger screening at airports.
He was about bleeding us financially -- in life and perhaps even in death -- after his effort to make isolationists out of Americans failed. Can't say that he's been a complete failure even in death.
It's not like the government is unable to waste a couple trillion dollars reacting to everything and nothing at all -- courtesy of the public's apathy, ignorance and/or paranoia. The TSA has never been satisfied with its budget being only as much as it is; nor has the TSA ever been satisfied with being restricted to passenger screening at airports.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#5
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
I wonder how much of this is being used to put pressure on the AmTrak PD chief who booted TSA's sorry butt off AmTrak property...
#6
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SAN
Programs: PR Premier Elite
Posts: 1,950
You know. I do believe all kinds of important intel will be derived from the raid. But I do not believe OBL wrote up a detailed terror plot and saved it in his My Documents folder as Secret_Terror_Plot.doc . I'm guessing it will take allot more work than that.
Quite candidly, I believe the US government planned a train harassment campaign already and is lying when they say they are rolling it out now in response to discovering Bin Laden was planning terror attacks.
Quite candidly, I believe the US government planned a train harassment campaign already and is lying when they say they are rolling it out now in response to discovering Bin Laden was planning terror attacks.
#7
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: TBD. In a server room.
Posts: 2,083
Of course, the only recent domestic incident of this type of attack might be blamed on homegrown nutbars.
cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Pa...ona_derailment
cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Pa...ona_derailment
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
OBL being dead should change nothing. Trains are still trains. No more or less dangerous than before. There was mention of wanting to do something on trains on 9/11/11, but absolutely no evidence anything happened in that direction. If the TSA uses this as an excuse to expand their empire I think it will, and certainly should, backfire, as most people still haven't been exposed to the abuses of this disgrace of an agency. Hopefully people who ride trains will react to them like... well, people who ride trains. GET 'EM!
#12
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HOU
Posts: 459
I've always wanted to see what happens when a screener gets hit by a train, and give them 4 minutes of molesting before someone shows me.
Last edited by essxjay; May 6, 2011 at 7:58 am Reason: derogatory
#13
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
The fact that the government is now publicly discussing a threat to rails is one way of "softening" the public to accept invasive airport-style security on trains.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 353
I'll be very interested in hearing Amtrak's response to this. I applaud them for putting the TSA in its place once and I hope they will have the spine to do it again. And again. However many times it takes.
The really interesting part will be Amtrak's response after an attack is successfully pulled off. I would hope that they'd stand fast and say "No, we'll tend to our own problems with the aid of real law-enforcement officers." My worry is that because Amtrak is partly government-operated (isn't it? Something to do with controlled monopolies?), the government will force the disgusting, worthless and unjustifiable terrorist group that is the TSA upon Amtrak.
If that happens, I only hope that the people wake up and realize that the only way TSA is going away is if we push back against them at every level. And we will no longer be able to afford the luxury of the mentality of "It's not the little guys' fault, they're just trying to feed their families." We're going to have to make lives as miserable as possible for each and every last organism that collects a paycheck from the TSA, no matter what its rank.
Last edited by essxjay; May 6, 2011 at 7:58 am
#15
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
Can't exactly address the difficulties, but I think most western nations are eventually going to have to address access to our territory by people with jihadist sentiments. I feel our borders are entirely too open. The poor and huddled masses are no LONGER longing to be free. Some at least are longing to assist the people in our country who don't like anyone being free.
Beyond that, free practice of religion should no longer include reviling the people and culture of the United States. Can't prevent it in Yemen, but I never understand why UK and the United States tolerates the blatant crying of "fire" in a crowded theater which is the stock in trade of radical religionists of all kinds. I don't mind attacks on the government. No problem there. But "Americans should be killed" makes a mockery of the intentions of the Founding Fathers. We can't raise them from the dead to ask them, but I find it a no-brainer that recruitment of impressionable youth to commit religion-based homicide is NOT "the free pracitce of religion". If those doing it were selling cocaine, running rackets, or promoting fascism with homicidal conspiracies, would we really extend the umbrella of sacred free speech to them? I hope not. Same with these people who come to America and try to recruit Somali teenagers to return to the homeland and join Al Shabbab.
Bombs don't kill people, terrorists setting off bombs do. Trying to protect every inch of rail in the country makes no sense if no effort is made to exclude those motivated is made first. And I'm never gonna accept the "it can't be done". How many things have we done where someone said we couldn't?
Beyond that, free practice of religion should no longer include reviling the people and culture of the United States. Can't prevent it in Yemen, but I never understand why UK and the United States tolerates the blatant crying of "fire" in a crowded theater which is the stock in trade of radical religionists of all kinds. I don't mind attacks on the government. No problem there. But "Americans should be killed" makes a mockery of the intentions of the Founding Fathers. We can't raise them from the dead to ask them, but I find it a no-brainer that recruitment of impressionable youth to commit religion-based homicide is NOT "the free pracitce of religion". If those doing it were selling cocaine, running rackets, or promoting fascism with homicidal conspiracies, would we really extend the umbrella of sacred free speech to them? I hope not. Same with these people who come to America and try to recruit Somali teenagers to return to the homeland and join Al Shabbab.
Bombs don't kill people, terrorists setting off bombs do. Trying to protect every inch of rail in the country makes no sense if no effort is made to exclude those motivated is made first. And I'm never gonna accept the "it can't be done". How many things have we done where someone said we couldn't?