Community
Wiki Posts
Search

denied entry into Canada

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2011, 9:47 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Originally Posted by mileena
This section from the Canadian Immigration website seems to apply to your co-worker's situation:

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/informa...des/5312E5.asp

"Rehabilitation for persons who are inadmissible to Canada because of past criminal activity (IMM 5312)

Coming to, or remaining in Canada without approval of rehabilitation

If you need to come to Canada, but cannot apply for rehabilitation because five years have not passed since the end of the sentence imposed or you are not eligible to apply for a pardon for convictions in Canada, you may ask an officer for special permission to enter or remain in Canada. Complete the Application for Criminal Rehabilitation, but check the box that states, “For Information Only.” Attach the documents outlined in the Document Checklist. After reviewing the form and looking at the nature of the offences, number of offences, when they happened and your current situation, the officer may:


At Canadian visa offices outside of Canada

advise that they do not recommend that you travel to Canada; or,
advise that you could apply for special permission (temporary resident’s permit) to enter Canada*.


At Ports of Entry (airport, marine or land)
(Contact your nearest Canadian visa office before travelling to Canada.)

advise that you will not be allowed to enter Canada and ask you to return immediately to your country of departure;
take enforcement action (arrest, detention and/or removal); or,
advise that you could apply for special permission (temporary resident’s permit) to enter Canada*.


In Canada

ask that you leave Canada voluntarily;
take enforcement action (arrest, detention, and/or removal from Canada); or
advise that you could apply for special permission (temporary resident’s permit) to remain in Canada*.

*There will be processing fees for applications for special permission to come into or remain in Canada. You will be advised of the processing fees at the time, or you can refer to our website for further details."


[end]

In the past, people have been successful getting in to Canada at the border by emphasizing they are a tourist and there to spend lots of money (no kidding). But you have to convince the Border Agent you are dealing with of this, and he has final discretion...period...even if you already have a Temporary Resident Permit or Certificate of Rehabilitation. He could just as likely send you home, as he did to the OP's co-worker.
that's interesting. I wonder if handing the border patrolman a large sack of toonies would also qualify one for an exception?
nachtnebel is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 9:58 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, NYC, somewhere on planet Earth
Programs: UA 1K, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 8,289
Originally Posted by azmmza
A co worker just called me from YVR and told me he was denied entry into Canada.

He was on his way to Whistler for a week-long ski vacation and upon landing in YVR he was refused entry due to a DUI that he received in 2007.

I only spoke with him briefly, and will get all the details when he comes back tonight, but I was wondering.... shouldn't the airline that flew him to YVR have checked eligibility? at no point was he told that a 4 year old DUI would exclude him entry.
does he have any recourse for his expenses?
he prepaid the hotel, ski lift tickets and rental. I think it was a package deal.

He purchased travel insurance, would this be something that they cover?
the trip was purchased on a citi bank AAdvantage american express card. would that offer him any protection?

I know drinking and driving is a serious issue, i dont want to get into how bad it is in this thread, I just want to know if he has any options or is he S O L

Thanks
An extensive thread discussing entry into Canada with a Criminal record can be found here.

The airline has no obligation to check for criminal history exclusion, though as a visitor to another country, it is an obligation for a tourist to check on eligibility, visas, etc. While it may seem absurd, Canada does state it quite clearly here. In the website, it does offer solutions to being inadmissible under Criminal conviction rules - I do not have any experience re: odds of 'rehabilitation' applications.

As for whether your friend is SOL, I think the only recourse for your friend is to seek refund through travel insurance coverage, or contact the package dealer about refunds. I am not sure what his AA Amex covers, but it would not hurt to check. I suspect that they may cite the inadmissibility clause and that your friend should know this.
neuron is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 10:04 am
  #33  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by neuron
I think the only recourse for your friend is to seek refund through travel insurance coverage, or contact the package dealer about refunds. I am not sure what his AA Amex covers, but it would not hurt to check. I suspect that they may cite the inadmissibility clause and that your friend should know this.
I agree. I would contact everyone involved-- first the charter package people to see if they want to refund a portion as a courtesy, then the travel insurance, then the credit card people.

I would *not* state the reason for being turned away upfront, though if asked, it would have to be disclosed.
Ari is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 1:04 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: AVL
Programs: AA, AS, SQ, Hilton Diamond, PC Platinum, National Exec
Posts: 726
There is one thing I am surprised nobody brought up. I think it is pretty outrages that the US Federal government shares NCIC with a foreign state. Talk about selling out your own citizens.

We sure are safer now that we can keep all of those Canadian's out of the US with criminal convictions .
Dan6681 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 1:09 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Originally Posted by Dan6681
There is one thing I am surprised nobody brought up. I think it is pretty outrages that the US Federal government shares NCIC with a foreign state. Talk about selling out your own citizens.
IIRC, this came about of the US requiring some info from Canada, so this was reciprocal. I'm not sure when this started, does anyone know?

This came up in a previous lengthy thread about this subject, although I can't put my fingers on it at the moment.
N965VJ is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 1:33 pm
  #36  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_p...y_requirements

How is this a safety or security issue ?
IMO it is not with respect to the individual but as we've allowed entry and immigration discussions here in the past and this thread is so far along we'll keep it here. In the future, we'll try to be quicker about moving these types of convos over to the appropriate Destinations forum.

We've removed a number of posts tangential to the OP's concern. If you'd like to discuss the politics of DUI laws, OMNI is your spot. Information on entry issues related to Israel, UK or anywhere else may be taken up in the appropriate Destination forum, TravelBuzz or OMNI as forum rubric dictates.

---------
essxjay
TS/S moderator

Last edited by essxjay; Apr 11, 2011 at 1:41 pm
essxjay is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 1:51 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,347
Originally Posted by N965VJ
IIRC, this came about of the US requiring some info from Canada, so this was reciprocal. I'm not sure when this started, does anyone know?

This came up in a previous lengthy thread about this subject, although I can't put my fingers on it at the moment.
It has been the case as far back 1997 when I started. It has been longer than that though. I will see if I can get a better time frame from those that should know.

FB
Firebug4 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 2:28 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by neuron
In the website, it does offer solutions to being inadmissible under Criminal conviction rules - I do not have any experience re: odds of 'rehabilitation' applications.
It does work. I have an acquaintance convicted for petty theft as a teenager who successfully got a permanent waiver to enter Canada.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 6:34 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: AVL
Programs: AA, AS, SQ, Hilton Diamond, PC Platinum, National Exec
Posts: 726
Originally Posted by Firebug4
It has been the case as far back 1997 when I started. It has been longer than that though. I will see if I can get a better time frame from those that should know.

FB
That is interesting. I had never heard of people getting turned back until after 9/11. Although the inadmissibility rules for admission to Canada that include things like DUI were in force long before then.

What does Canada (and the US) do with incomplete NCIC records? Do they count them as convictions unless otherwise proven not?

Last edited by Dan6681; Apr 11, 2011 at 6:43 pm Reason: (and the US)
Dan6681 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 7:00 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 208
The NCIC contains state and federal convictions and arrests where fingerprints were taken if the jurisdiction decided to report them to the FBI. It also contains active felony arrest warrants and select misdemeanor warrants (usually involving violence or significant drug activity) that the states and other jurisdictions report to the NCIC for a fee.

Canada uses the conviction info and arrest warrant info contained in the NCIC according to their guidelines. If there is arrest info on your NCIC record that is less than a year old (or maybe two years??? i am not sure) where there isn't any indication that the case has been disposed of, they might consider that an open case unless you can produce paperwork the the case has been dismissed or otherwise resolved in the meantime. I think they just assume that any older arrests listed have already been resolved. If they had any questions, the burden would be on you to produce paperwork.

If the info was not reported to NCIC, there is nothing Canada can do about that, unless they want to spend the time to go on a fishing expedition. I think the Canadian Border Patrol may have access to certain state records too, like maybe in Washington or New York?? But otherwise, unless they know of your non-reported crimes and moral faults (unprosecuted drug use), they will not most likely know about this. But if they are suspicious of you, they do not need a reason to deny you entry. It is totally up tot he discretion of the border guard reviewing your case, even if you have a temporary vistor's permit or visa. He just may not like the way you act or look. There is no unequivocal right to visit another country where you are not a citizen.

Last edited by mileena; Apr 11, 2011 at 7:07 pm
mileena is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 7:38 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,347
Originally Posted by Dan6681
That is interesting. I had never heard of people getting turned back until after 9/11. Although the inadmissibility rules for admission to Canada that include things like DUI were in force long before then.

What does Canada (and the US) do with incomplete NCIC records? Do they count them as convictions unless otherwise proven not?
It happened then daily just as it does now. However, I was referring to the US and Canada having access to each others criminal database. CBP doesn't have to do anything with incomplete NCIC records. The applicant must prove that he or she is admissible to the United States. If the officer suspects that the applicant may be inadmissible due to the existence of a database record, the applicant may be required to prove that they are admissible.

FB
Firebug4 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 7:42 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ottawa
Programs: Cessna TTx Self-Fly
Posts: 2,982
Originally Posted by Dan6681
That is interesting. I had never heard of people getting turned back until after 9/11. Although the inadmissibility rules for admission to Canada that include things like DUI were in force long before then.
I remember crossing the border by car from Canada to the US back in 1989 and a friend who was traveling with me was denied entry into the US because he had a Canadian criminal record.
OttawaMark is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 7:55 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: AVL
Programs: AA, AS, SQ, Hilton Diamond, PC Platinum, National Exec
Posts: 726
Originally Posted by Firebug4
It has been the case as far back 1997 when I started. It has been longer than that though. I will see if I can get a better time frame from those that should know.

FB
Thanks, any word on the above?
Dan6681 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2011, 8:39 pm
  #44  
sfo
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Programs: UA MM *Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 1,852
I had a Canadian friend that I use to travel with. We traveled to and through USA numerous times, always submitting our passports to the CBP at the border. Sometimes we would fly from Vancouver and sometimes we would drive from Vancouver, never any problems, until shortly after 9/11 when we were crossing the land border into the USA and he was refused entry into the USA at the border due to the fact that he had been convicted of selling narcotics to an under cover police officer in Montreal some 15 years earlier and convicted of the crime. So apparently information between the two countries became much more intense after 9/11
sfo is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2011, 9:42 pm
  #45  
nrr
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: jfk area
Programs: AA platinum; 2MM AA, Delta Diamond, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,291
Canada (or any other country) can make whatever rules they want re denying entry, it seems to me that rejecting someone for a DUI over 4 years old, with no intervening infractions is "overkill" IMHO.
nrr is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.