Touching face and hair -- what is point?
#122
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 389
I get the joke, but I insist on considering the TSA agents to be just the same as I am.
I do not give them a pass. They are humans the same as we are. They should know better. They should act better. they should refuse to degrade others as they would not want to be degraded themselves.
I do not give them a pass. They are humans the same as we are. They should know better. They should act better. they should refuse to degrade others as they would not want to be degraded themselves.
#123
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
I get the joke, but I insist on considering the TSA agents to be just the same as I am. They are not some lower form of life. They can understand things the same as I can, they have, or should have, most of the same feelings of protection and love as I have for my family. They would not want their loved ones felt over, looked at naked to the point of tears. Why then do they do this to others? Why would a woman grope over another woman's hair, knowing the impact of this?
We've seen multiple postings from TSA employees saying that they fully support these searches, in order to make their family members "safe" they occasionally have to "upset" them.
I see it as very similar to those who argue that to protect their female relatives, they need to perform what is commonly referred to as "female genital mutilation," supposedly performed as a "modesty" measure.
If these people were capable of the least bit of empathy, they wouldn't be doing the things they do. But they're doing them, and even trying to justify their behavior.
Sociopathy is one possible explanation, and psychopathy is another.
But even more mind-boggling is the statement from some of them that they're only paid enough to grope people, and not paid enough to run the show. It reminds me of the old joke about Churchill and the socialite...
Churchill: Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?
Socialite: My goodness, Mr. Churchill… Well, I suppose… we would have to discuss terms, of course…
Churchill: Would you sleep with me for five pounds?
Socialite: Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!
Churchill: Madam, we’ve already established that. Now we are haggling about the price.
#125
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,096
I get the joke, but I insist on considering the TSA agents to be just the same as I am. They are not some lower form of life. They can understand things the same as I can, they have, or should have, most of the same feelings of protection and love as I have for my family. They would not want their loved ones felt over, looked at naked to the point of tears. Why then do they do this to others? Why would a woman grope over another woman's hair, knowing the impact of this?
I do not give them a pass. They are humans the same as we are. They should know better. They should act better. they should refuse to degrade others as they would not want to be degraded themselves.
I do not give them a pass. They are humans the same as we are. They should know better. They should act better. they should refuse to degrade others as they would not want to be degraded themselves.
But the TSA employees do these things to other people day in, day out.
How do I reconcile the actions of TSA employees?
The big question, just where does that leave us in regards to TSA?
#126
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
I'm going to have to disagree again.
We've seen multiple postings from TSA employees saying that they fully support these searches, in order to make their family members "safe" they occasionally have to "upset" them.
I see it as very similar to those who argue that to protect their female relatives, they need to perform what is commonly referred to as "female genital mutilation," supposedly performed as a "modesty" measure.
If these people were capable of the least bit of empathy, they wouldn't be doing the things they do. But they're doing them, and even trying to justify their behavior.
Sociopathy is one possible explanation, and psychopathy is another.
But even more mind-boggling is the statement from some of them that they're only paid enough to grope people, and not paid enough to run the show. It reminds me of the old joke about Churchill and the socialite...
Churchill: Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?
Socialite: My goodness, Mr. Churchill… Well, I suppose… we would have to discuss terms, of course…
Churchill: Would you sleep with me for five pounds?
Socialite: Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!
Churchill: Madam, we’ve already established that. Now we are haggling about the price.
We've seen multiple postings from TSA employees saying that they fully support these searches, in order to make their family members "safe" they occasionally have to "upset" them.
I see it as very similar to those who argue that to protect their female relatives, they need to perform what is commonly referred to as "female genital mutilation," supposedly performed as a "modesty" measure.
If these people were capable of the least bit of empathy, they wouldn't be doing the things they do. But they're doing them, and even trying to justify their behavior.
Sociopathy is one possible explanation, and psychopathy is another.
But even more mind-boggling is the statement from some of them that they're only paid enough to grope people, and not paid enough to run the show. It reminds me of the old joke about Churchill and the socialite...
Churchill: Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?
Socialite: My goodness, Mr. Churchill… Well, I suppose… we would have to discuss terms, of course…
Churchill: Would you sleep with me for five pounds?
Socialite: Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!
Churchill: Madam, we’ve already established that. Now we are haggling about the price.
What started as a desire to have dominance over individuals in an "acceptable" way, via control at the checkpoint, has now escalated to allowing those who have desires that are absolutely unacceptable in any other situation to assault people at checkpoints under cover of "authority."
#127
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
What started as a desire to have dominance over individuals in an "acceptable" way, via control at the checkpoint, has now escalated to allowing those who have desires that are absolutely unacceptable in any other situation to assault people at checkpoints under cover of "authority."
"I had to do that because I was following orders," fits neatly with "...there is a tendency to blame others, or to offer plausible rationalizations for the behaviour bringing the patient into conflict with society."
http://apps.who.int/classifications/...?gf60.htm+f602
Reading through the ICD-10 f60.2 is like reading an overview of TSA behaviors.
#128
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Those who work for the TSA know or should know the nature of the violations they are performing against their fellow citizens and human beings. They have no excuse for what they are doing.
Their activities in the scope and grope area need to be brought to an end. I'm not terribly picky on how that gets done. Politically, judicially, or by other means. Politically and judicially would be best, and by choice I am participating to the extent I can in political solutions.
A practical concern is how to protect yourself and your family from this. One way is to not fly. Some fly but opt out. Some opt out and make things uncomfortable for the blue shirts.
If we can't turn this around, the things being done at airport checkpoints will get worse. Cavity search style scanners exist, and what do you think will happen to resolve issues there....?
#129
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 646
I think TSA'ers are normal people, albeit without outstanding moral principles, courage or education. No spine and no mental flexibility to see the greater picture and understand the passenger's points of view. Very limited capacity for introspection.
I do not believe they are inherently evil, just banal.
I do not believe they are inherently evil, just banal.
#130
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
I think TSA'ers are normal people, albeit without outstanding moral principles, courage or education. No spine and no mental flexibility to see the greater picture and understand the passenger's points of view. Very limited capacity for introspection.
I do not believe they are inherently evil, just banal.
I do not believe they are inherently evil, just banal.
#131
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: SW Rapid Rewards, Hilton Honors, Marriott, Avis First
Posts: 4,831
I think TSA'ers are normal people, albeit without outstanding moral principles, courage or education. No spine and no mental flexibility to see the greater picture and understand the passenger's points of view. Very limited capacity for introspection.
I do not believe they are inherently evil, just banal.
I do not believe they are inherently evil, just banal.
Sadly, people who have not been trained to be in positions of authority are quick to discover the power they have can be used to boost their ego and suppress anyone that disagrees with them.
#132
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
"Written statements on the official TSA website takes precendence over any other verbal comments or written statement made by an agent of the TSA and otherwise verbal or written internal memos that have not been updated to the TSA website. This clause cannot be reversed or changed and the violation of this clause by any agent of the TSA will result in immediate termination."
Remove their claimed "authoritah" of knowing more than the TSA website due to their incompetance.
#133
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
In addition, they are people who have not been properly trained to be in positions of authority. Unfortunately, that authority is widely abused when you get the dreaded "Do you want to fly today?" or get told that the information you read on the TSA website it out of date.
Sadly, people who have not been trained to be in positions of authority are quick to discover the power they have can be used to boost their ego and suppress anyone that disagrees with them.
Sadly, people who have not been trained to be in positions of authority are quick to discover the power they have can be used to boost their ego and suppress anyone that disagrees with them.
#134
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,096
By using such an unprecedented dragnet that violates the sexual and personal privacy of people in an extremely invasive way, the TSA is operating consistently and by design in ways forbidden by the US Constitution. This makes them an outlaw organization.
Those who work for the TSA know or should know the nature of the violations they are performing against their fellow citizens and human beings. They have no excuse for what they are doing.
Their activities in the scope and grope area need to be brought to an end. I'm not terribly picky on how that gets done. Politically, judicially, or by other means. Politically and judicially would be best, and by choice I am participating to the extent I can in political solutions.
A practical concern is how to protect yourself and your family from this. One way is to not fly. Some fly but opt out. Some opt out and make things uncomfortable for the blue shirts.
If we can't turn this around, the things being done at airport checkpoints will get worse. Cavity search style scanners exist, and what do you think will happen to resolve issues there....?
Those who work for the TSA know or should know the nature of the violations they are performing against their fellow citizens and human beings. They have no excuse for what they are doing.
Their activities in the scope and grope area need to be brought to an end. I'm not terribly picky on how that gets done. Politically, judicially, or by other means. Politically and judicially would be best, and by choice I am participating to the extent I can in political solutions.
A practical concern is how to protect yourself and your family from this. One way is to not fly. Some fly but opt out. Some opt out and make things uncomfortable for the blue shirts.
If we can't turn this around, the things being done at airport checkpoints will get worse. Cavity search style scanners exist, and what do you think will happen to resolve issues there....?
I also believe that most of these people don't have the guts to stand up for their beliefs and tell TSA to take a hike.
#135
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 319
Thinking about this touching of hair and face...
While the end result (and maybe some of the intent) is prison intake style screening, I'm wondering if whatever policy dictates touching face, neck, and hair is actually designed, like so many of these policies, so that a trained monkey could do it without any critical thinking. If someone had a big, poofy afro or a substantial beard it would be logical to search it. But, so that whether to search someone's hair or beard isn't left up to smurf's discretion, they touch everyone's neck, face, and hair. It's sort of like stories I've read where people get their bare arms frisked, and once they mention this is stupid, that part of the frisk is over.
Of course, they don't seem to touch everyone's, and they don't seem to all do it, so of course the whole thing is totally ridiculous. And the fact that they do it without thinking increases the likelihood that they won't think enough to actually discover anything. But I'm just wondering if, as a PP mentioned, this is rooted primarily in banal administrative nonsense.
Sorry if someone already mentioned this. I think I missed some of the thread.
While the end result (and maybe some of the intent) is prison intake style screening, I'm wondering if whatever policy dictates touching face, neck, and hair is actually designed, like so many of these policies, so that a trained monkey could do it without any critical thinking. If someone had a big, poofy afro or a substantial beard it would be logical to search it. But, so that whether to search someone's hair or beard isn't left up to smurf's discretion, they touch everyone's neck, face, and hair. It's sort of like stories I've read where people get their bare arms frisked, and once they mention this is stupid, that part of the frisk is over.
Of course, they don't seem to touch everyone's, and they don't seem to all do it, so of course the whole thing is totally ridiculous. And the fact that they do it without thinking increases the likelihood that they won't think enough to actually discover anything. But I'm just wondering if, as a PP mentioned, this is rooted primarily in banal administrative nonsense.
Sorry if someone already mentioned this. I think I missed some of the thread.