![]() |
Originally Posted by neko
(Post 15827248)
I doubt the Port of Portland Commission is reading this thread. You're going to have to do a little more work than that.
PDX is owned by the Port of Portland. THE PORT OF PORTLAND BOX 3529 PORTLAND, OR 97208 The Port Commission is appointed by the Governor and approved by the State Senate. They also have a community outreach program and open meetings, but don't seem to have a citizens' advisory board, as in Austin. PDX also has an International Air Service Committee. This is a group of business leaders who lobby airlines to support international flights to PDX - they may also be interested in factors that affect the desirability of PDX as a int'l transport hub. |
Originally Posted by jordanmills
(Post 15827279)
why couldn't HOU have grown a pair and done this?
It would be better to pose the question to the City of Houston, which has a city council and a mayor ([email protected]). Austin is perhaps unusual in having a citizens' airport advisory board (and, yes, in other ways too :)). But that doesn't mean that their progress isn't the result of a lot hard work on the part of a lot of people. |
Originally Posted by RedSnapper
(Post 15827369)
I agree that this is mostly symbolic. There are two very definite (potential) positives that I see here though:
1. There is actual organized opposition to the TSA on the local level. Once you have local organization in numbers those people can show up en masse at the local airport to picket and hand out literature for a day. Once you do this, they can go from having 10 opt-outs a day to 1000, and the number of calls and letters to the local congressman will increase likewise. |
Originally Posted by Chellian
(Post 15827116)
Dear Portland: Please do the same thing. Thanks.
Dear Miami: Please do the same thing. Thanks. Dear Ft Lauderdale: Please do the same thing. Thanks. |
SXSW is coming up in a few weeks (March 11-20)... anyone in a position to introduce the organizers to the Airport Advisory Board?
Can you imagine the effects of thousands of tech/media savvy professionals all opting out at the airport that week? |
Originally Posted by RedSnapper
(Post 15827369)
... they can go from having 10 opt-outs a day to 1000.
It might be a bigger story than the national opt out day. |
Originally Posted by ElizabethConley
(Post 15824422)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index....istance-to-tsa
I wish my state had leaders instead of walking, talking sewer pipes. Why can't every state be Texas? But if every state was Texas, then no state would be. And I have to admit, as heartening as it is to see organized resistance to TSA, old cynical me doesn't really believe that they have a snowball's chance in the Abode of the Fallen Angels of actually making a dent, either in the Fed or in nation-wide public opinion. |
Well done Austin. Alas, this would never have happened in DFW, where the predominant personality is a judicious mix of Yosemite Sam and Hermann Goehring.
|
From the story, a link:
http://tsatyranny.com/ Wow. Wonder if these folks could be requested to travel around and educate others...that website looks awesome. |
Then, on Dec. 22, Austinite Claire HIrschkind was arrested at ABIA, as reported in The New American. When she showed up for a flight and simply asked a question about the presence of scanners, her inquiry prompted the TSA to require her submission to a pat down. Her objection caused the TSA to become hostile and resulted in a public treatment of Mrs. Hirschkind that horrified Austinites. The incident ended in her arrest and banishment from the airport for six months. She has retained counsel and is currently seeking legal redress. Her story gained national attention and rallied the support of others who had already had enough of TSA assaults. I had planned to fly out of the US from an airport without the scanners with a refundable ticket, and then just reschedule after refusing a rubdown, but this 6 month ban thing puts a new wrinkle in that strategy. It is like they have foreseen such plans and have attempted to thwart them. Notice how there is no talk of any kind of a 6 month ban until it actually happens. This kind of story should sicken anyone who cares about freedom to even the smallest extent. Read the story the article links to. The DHS/TSA is out of control and obviously answerable to no one. I'd like to imagine a mexican standoff between Austin Police and a cadre of Air Marshalls, but that is fantasy. In the US cops are *always* pro-government. They will do exactly what the DHS/TSA tells them to. |
An excellent article:
Braving the culture of fear: an elected official examines how Americans have become prisoners of their own anxiety. Benjamin Franklin warned that those who would sacrifice liberty to seek safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. But even worse are those who sacrifice liberty without achieving any greater safety. Much of this might be justified if there were some rational relationship to the actual threats. But that is rarely the case. |
Interesting coming out of Texas. The same state that thought taking over 500 kids from their parents in a paramilitary raid with no probably cause was a good idea. Texas' stomping on people's freedom and liberty and basic human (and child) rights makes the TSA seem like patriots.
That said, I hope what's happening in Austin with regard to the TSA spreads. It keeps light on the issue, raises awareness, and each credible opposition (as opposed to exaggeration and FUD) lends weight. Wimpie, good post btw. |
Originally Posted by JSFox
(Post 15831746)
Interesting coming out of Texas. The same state that thought taking over 500 kids from their parents in a paramilitary raid with no probably cause was a good idea. Texas' stomping on people's freedom and liberty and basic human (and child) rights makes the TSA seem like patriots.
That said, I hope what's happening in Austin with regard to the TSA spreads. It keeps light on the issue, raises awareness, and each credible opposition (as opposed to exaggeration and FUD) lends weight. Wimpie, good post btw. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 15831805)
What raid are you refering to?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YFZ_Ranch |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 15831805)
What raid are you refering to?
The ranch is a group of Mormons, most of whom live a polygynous lifestyle. Court rulings found the raid to be unwarranted, illegal, and eventually ordered all children returned to their parents. Five people ended up being prosecuted for sex with underage girls (who they were supposedly married to). Only one of the girls would testify against her husband, the others said that they were happy in their marriage and had sex with their husbands willingly. I interviewed a number of people connected with this thing. Warren Jeffs, their leader when the raid happened, is creepy and IMHO probably should be locked up. The guy whose wife testified against him was kinda creepy too. The rest of the people at the ranch are extremely nice, intelligent, hard-working folks who just want to live their lives. Just about everyone in every family I talked to was far happier in their family, marriage, and daily life than other average Americans. There are no kids born and raised out of wedlock or by single-parents. Investigating for potential child abuse was as warranted at YFZ as in any neighborhood or apartment building in the U.S. Removing over 500 children without cause was not. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:25 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.