![]() |
Cosmic rays and aluminun vs composite
Does anyone know how much protection an aluminum airframe/skin affords against in-flight radiation and whether the new composite materials (ie 787) differ?
|
Originally Posted by UALpremier
(Post 15547347)
Does anyone know how much protection an aluminum airframe/skin affords against in-flight radiation and whether the new composite materials (ie 787) differ?
There's a break-even point on shielding, given that secondary, tertiary, and quaternary radiation emitted from the shielding itself can be more dangerous than the initial particle that simply zips right on through lower-density materials without causing any problems. I forget who wrote it, but one comment early in the space race said something to the effect that Man was safest in space with just enough shielding to keep out the UV and keep in the air. |
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 15547997)
It's been quite some time since I rolled the numbers, but as I recall the majority of radiation exposure at high altitude is not X-rays, but cosmic radiation - high energy stuff.
There's a break-even point on shielding, given that secondary, tertiary, and quaternary radiation emitted from the shielding itself can be more dangerous than the initial particle that simply zips right on through lower-density materials without causing any problems. I forget who wrote it, but one comment early in the space race said something to the effect that Man was safest in space with just enough shielding to keep out the UV and keep in the air. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:48 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.