FlyerTalk Forums
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Here We Go Again (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/1165327-here-we-go-again.html)

ElizabethConley Dec 29, 2010 6:10 am
Here We Go Again
 
http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=13752120

This time they don't like the curvature of her rump.

Boggie Dog Dec 29, 2010 7:32 am
Originally Posted by ElizabethConley (Post 15541536)
http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=13752120

This time they don't like the curvature of her rump.
If her rump was "concerning" to TSA yesterday why is it ok today?

El Cochinito Dec 29, 2010 9:23 am
Oh, my, god. Becky, look at her butt.
It is so big. She looks like, one of those rap guys' girlfriends.
(...)
I like big butts and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny...

Baby Got Back
Sir Mix-a-Lot

goalie Dec 29, 2010 11:19 am
Originally Posted by El Cochinito (Post 15542554)
Oh, my, god. Becky, look at her butt.
It is so big. She looks like, one of those rap guys' girlfriends.
(...)
I like big butts and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny...

Baby Got Back
Sir Mix-a-Lot
It's a good thing it wasn't Oprah as she'd be banned from flying for life ;)
<slithering off to the locker room with a game misconduct>

n4zhg Dec 29, 2010 3:53 pm
Please Spay And Neuter Your TSO
 
It's obvious that TSA has a testosterone poisoning issue.

Fredd Dec 29, 2010 4:07 pm
We're already getting to the bottom of things in this thread. ;)

TheGolfWidow Dec 29, 2010 4:30 pm
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 15541860)
If her rump was "concerning" to TSA yesterday why is it ok today?
This woman is obviously not going to get through an airport security checkpoint without having both shifts get a look at her behind.

Fredd Dec 29, 2010 4:34 pm
Originally Posted by TheGolfWidow (Post 15545254)
This woman is obviously not going to get through an airport security checkpoint without having both shifts get a look at her behind.
Apparently all they'd have to do is find the right 1997 Playboy.

Sounds like profiling though. :D

cynicAAl Dec 29, 2010 5:13 pm
Originally Posted by goalie (Post 15543371)
It's a good thing it wasn't Oprah as she'd be banned from flying for life ;)
when you have your own personal G4, you can make the seats as wide as you want.

n4zhg Dec 29, 2010 5:26 pm
Originally Posted by Fredd (Post 15545285)
Apparently all they'd have to do is find the right 1997 Playboy.

Sounds like profiling though. :D
Which month?

Fredd Dec 29, 2010 5:30 pm
Originally Posted by n4zhg (Post 15545566)
Which month?
Sorry, not a clue. I haven't subscribed since the 60s - and then only for the great articles. :cool:

Michilander Dec 29, 2010 8:48 pm
Originally Posted by goalie (Post 15543371)
It's a good thing it wasn't Oprah as she'd be banned from flying for life ;)
<slithering off to the locker room with a game misconduct>
Yeah, I think that got you 5, 10 and a game. :)

eyecue Dec 29, 2010 9:03 pm
That article is a typical drive by. There is nothing in it. They are talking about and confusing multiple events. If she was banned, that would mean that she could never fly. The headline is misleading.

Global_Hi_Flyer Jan 2, 2011 4:39 pm
Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 15546542)
That article is a typical drive by. There is nothing in it. They are talking about and confusing multiple events. If she was banned, that would mean that she could never fly. The headline is misleading.
If you deny someone the right to fly on a given day, then you have banned them from flying. That ban may be lifted the next day, but it is still a ban.

Boggie Dog Jan 2, 2011 4:50 pm
Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 15546542)
That article is a typical drive by. There is nothing in it. They are talking about and confusing multiple events. If she was banned, that would mean that she could never fly. The headline is misleading.
Why in the world would TSA keep a person from flying for the stated cause that something about her rump was concerning but ok her to fly the next day?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 am.
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.