Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IND: No camera in private screening room

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2010, 8:29 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK,USA
Programs: DL Plat,AA Plat,UA 1Peon,SW(WN) Passing Grade
Posts: 902
IND: No camera in private screening room

Good morning from Indianapolis (IND)......did my part for the movement by doing the opt-out.....just took 3 cries of "opt-out" before they found someone to do the enhanced patdown.....interesting to get the front-of-hand grope up-to-testicles from both front and back (the TSO hands were much wider than my legs).......

During the demeaning procedure which made me feel oh-so-American, I was staring-up at the ceiling noticing all the camera windows......so I talked with the 3-stripe supervisor afterwards to ask if all enhanced pat-downs were done in an place where the cameras could record them. He said "yes, but I don't think there's a camera in the private room in back."!!!!!!!!

Is that usual?
peersteve is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 8:46 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by peersteve
He said "yes, but I don't think there's a camera in the private room in back."!!!!!!!!
The TSA could make extra money by providing live internet feed, like those porn chat rooms.
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 8:54 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
TSA must not think you will need to record the encounter.. Supposedly, a witness is not even allowed to record the pat-down if you are pulled into a private room.
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 8:56 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
It seems to me that having cameras in the "private room" would at least partly defeat the purpose of going to the private room in the first place.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:15 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: M&M, AA GLD, FB
Posts: 233
However, it's another interesting thing to try. On what basis can they forbid you from recording the private pat-down? currently the TSA website states that all recording is fine except for security monitors.
TamCaP is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:18 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: Double OWE (AA EXP, QF Plat), FI Gold
Posts: 1,887
Originally Posted by TamCaP
However, it's another interesting thing to try. On what basis can they forbid you from recording the private pat-down? currently the TSA website states that all recording is fine except for security monitors.
It goes on to say that local laws (in some cases the airports can have their own ordinances) have the right to restrict/prohibit filming, so if the airport administration of local LEOs feel that filming security procedures is a threat they can restrict it. They may also do it based on the idea that they're protecting the pax's privacy (ˇ!) by not letting people film their pat-down? I guess it depends on how buddy-buddy the airport and TSA are...

From http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/custome...rial_1029.shtm :
TSA does not prohibit photographs at screening locations; however, local laws, state statutes, or local ordinances may. We recommend contacting your local airport authority in advance to ensure you are familiar with their local procedures. While TSA does not prohibit the public, passengers or press from photographing, videotaping, or filming at screening locations, TSA may ask a photographer to stop if they are interfering with the screening process or taking photos of X-ray monitor screens in a checkpoint.

Last edited by zpaul; Nov 17, 2010 at 9:29 am Reason: accuracy
zpaul is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:21 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Originally Posted by TamCaP
However, it's another interesting thing to try. On what basis can they forbid you from recording the private pat-down? currently the TSA website states that all recording is fine except for security monitors.
Technically, they don't ban the recording of monitors. They just ask you not to..



While TSA does not prohibit the public, passengers or press from photographing, videotaping, or filming at screening locations, TSA may ask a photographer to stop if they are interfering with the screening process or taking photos of X-ray monitor screens in a checkpoint.
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:21 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: M&M, AA GLD, FB
Posts: 233
At least one poster in this forum has previously stated that airport bans on private (non-commercial) photography of publicly accessible spaces will stand only until challenged in court.
OTOH, private screening area might be defined as a not publicly accessible spot, so different rules may apply.
Re: recording monitors
That's interesting. "TSA will ask you to stop". I believe I was told that in LEO lingo "asking" means something else than "requesting". As in, the former is (at least in theory) something you might refuse without any negative consequences.
TamCaP is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:27 am
  #9  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
Technically, they don't ban the recording of monitors. They just ask you not to..
While TSA does not prohibit the public, passengers or press from photographing, videotaping, or filming at screening locations, TSA may ask a photographer to stop if they are interfering with the screening process or taking photos of X-ray monitor screens in a checkpoint.
which of course in at the TSO's discretion so in simple terms, you're screwed
goalie is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:30 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by bdschobel
It seems to me that having cameras in the "private room" would at least partly defeat the purpose of going to the private room in the first place.

Bruce
Why? If a camera should be any place, it should be where passengers are alone with TSAers, with or without their own witness.

(Unless I misunderstood and we are talking about cameras owned by passengers.)
doober is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 9:40 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Originally Posted by bdschobel
It seems to me that having cameras in the "private room" would at least partly defeat the purpose of going to the private room in the first place.

Bruce
I would think the private room is to prevent other passengers from seeing the events. I'd still want there to be video evidence of any abuse from TSA.
jesirose is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 10:12 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: *wood Gold
Posts: 1,781
Originally Posted by jesirose
I would think the private room is to prevent other passengers from seeing the events. I'd still want there to be video evidence of any abuse from TSA.
If you have an Android-based phone there's a cool application for it that allows you to (at least) record the audio of what's happening in an unobtrusive manner that's impossible to detect even if TSA or local LEOs manage to want to play with your cell phone in the process. It's called Cop Recorder, and I've had it on my phone for several months now... When it starts recording there's really no way to tell that it's recording.

Prior to starting any screening process I start recording from the phone. If I'm verbally abused while going through the checkpoint I want to make sure that I have some record of it.

Now if they only made something that did the same thing in the same manner and included video... I'd love to just start the video recording and let it run undetected. It would be nice to be able to carry the phone through the WTMD on me as well, just to ensure that all confrontations are recorded. It would be nice to have something to show a jury in the (rather unlikely) event that I file a lawsuit against TSA (and specific TSOs) some day.
clrankin is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 10:29 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
Originally Posted by TamCaP
Re: recording monitors
That's interesting. "TSA will ask you to stop". I believe I was told that in LEO lingo "asking" means something else than "requesting". As in, the former is (at least in theory) something you might refuse without any negative consequences.
What the monitors show is SSI. TSA personnel have a duty to protect SSI, which is why they will ask you to stop photographing the monitors.

However, the vast majority of passengers are not "covered persons" and, as such, have no duty to protect SSI. So there is no legal prohibition against non-"covered persons" from filming the monitors, provided they are in plain view and you are not interfering with the screening process. FYI, airline personnel are for the most part considered "covered persons."
ND Sol is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 10:45 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Originally Posted by clrankin
If you have an Android-based phone there's a cool application for it that allows you to (at least) record the audio of what's happening in an unobtrusive manner that's impossible to detect even if TSA or local LEOs manage to want to play with your cell phone in the process. It's called Cop Recorder, and I've had it on my phone for several months now... When it starts recording there's really no way to tell that it's recording.

Prior to starting any screening process I start recording from the phone. If I'm verbally abused while going through the checkpoint I want to make sure that I have some record of it.

Now if they only made something that did the same thing in the same manner and included video... I'd love to just start the video recording and let it run undetected. It would be nice to be able to carry the phone through the WTMD on me as well, just to ensure that all confrontations are recorded. It would be nice to have something to show a jury in the (rather unlikely) event that I file a lawsuit against TSA (and specific TSOs) some day.
The BF and I both have iPhones and we plan to record anything that happens that we're uncomfortable with on our trip.
jesirose is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2010, 11:24 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Originally Posted by jesirose
The BF and I both have iPhones and we plan to record anything that happens that we're uncomfortable with on our trip.
+1

With the iPhone, you can set the voice recording function, and then lock the phone.
FriendlySkies is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.