"Not enough TSA to do patdown" is the new excuse
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, Amex Plat
Posts: 572
"Not enough TSA to do patdown" is the new excuse
A good friend of mine went though LAX today and opted out of the NoS. Apaprently, the TSO said that "there weren't enough TSOs available to do the patdown" and that they "preferred" if he would use the NoS. Ultimatly he stood his ground and got a patdown, but only after threatening to file a lawsuit.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN - BNA
Programs: Hilton Gold, WN RR
Posts: 1,818
Wow. Wonder what would have happened had your friend been female - apparently there aren't enough clerks to do the frisking on women. Probably your friend would have been groped by an opposite-sex screener.
Can't wait for Opt Out Day. I'll probably sit on my computer all damn day.
Can't wait for Opt Out Day. I'll probably sit on my computer all damn day.
#7
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
#8
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando
Programs: DL 4MM/PM, UA 1MM/Gold, AA Paper
Posts: 1,386
#9
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: AA Gold (former Platinum), SPG Gold, SWA, UA, National Car, TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 119
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,594
#11
Used to be Sydneysider
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
And don't forget that we have a stronger case for "unlawful detention" based on TSA's own policy that we may not exit the screening process once it has commenced.
#12
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: here and there
Programs: EB*G, UA ex1K
Posts: 570
Wow. Wonder what would have happened had your friend been female - apparently there aren't enough clerks to do the frisking on women. Probably your friend would have been groped by an opposite-sex screener.
Can't wait for Opt Out Day. I'll probably sit on my computer all damn day.
Can't wait for Opt Out Day. I'll probably sit on my computer all damn day.
#13
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
A good friend of mine went though LAX today and opted out of the NoS. Apaprently, the TSO said that "there weren't enough TSOs available to do the patdown" and that they "preferred" if he would use the NoS. Ultimatly he stood his ground and got a patdown, but only after threatening to file a lawsuit.
#14
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 6,932
These are government agents. I hardly think threatening them with local police will accomplish anything, nor do I think the local police would interfere with their operations. You're just going to sit there.
QL
QL
#15
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southwest Florida
Programs: AA lifetime Gold , DL Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 572
Bolding mine: And apparently I would say, "that's fine but that's not my problem. Please find someone do do the patdown now and while you're at it, please bring over the FSD for this airport, the TSA terminal manager, the Ground Service Coordinator for <insert airline name> and a LEO and I'll wait right here until you do. Thank you very much".
If that doesn’t get the TSO jumping, then when those people you requested do show up, use the retaliation word very often. And make sure to file a complaint of retaliation against the first TSO and any other supervisor including the above mentioned TSA managers that tries to talk their way out of it, so make sure you get their names and badge numbers.
Mr. Elliott
Mr. Elliott
Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Nov 16, 2010 at 12:55 am Reason: merge consecutive posts