Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Pistole on NBC's Today Show Nov 15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2010, 6:54 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 555
The video accompanying the interview made it pretty clear that the procedure is, as usual for TSA, hardly consistent. It's also clear that the terms "grope" and/or "fondle" are applicable.

Link for those who missed it.


~~ Irish
IrishDoesntFlyNow is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 6:57 am
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by CaptainMiles
Did anyone else pick up on Pissy's statement that kids under 12 (or was it 12 and under) can opt out of the NoS and not get the pat down?

New strategy, folks. We can now take our shampoo again. Just have your kids carry the shampoo in their diapers.
12 or 13 through 17, children and young adults should not be electronically striped searched or felt up by TSA unless some very compelling reasons are present. If those reasons are present then a LEO should be summoned.

Neither should adults!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:08 am
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
12 or 13 through 17, children and young adults should not be electronically striped searched or felt up by TSA unless some very compelling reasons are present. If those reasons are present then a LEO should be summoned.

Neither should adults!
DHS/TSA seems to be grooming children for sexual exploitation. Why else is the TSA encouraging children between the ages of 13-17 to let other people see them naked and rub their hands all over their body? All those lessons warning about sexual exploitation of minors -- from sickos wanting to see children naked to those same sickos wanting to rub against the private parts of young children (including 13-17 years old teenagers) -- are getting undermined by DHS/TSA.

DHS/TSA is the child molesters' dream and the parents' nightmare.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:08 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 429
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much

My guess is that he targeted the soccer moms as they are getting their kiddos ready for school. This is also a good way to ensure that Disney hotels are filled over the holidays.
But probably the same targeted soccer moms will be very angry, when they meet the reality: TSO's have not got the memo on this new rule. Deifinitely kids have not been exempted from pat-downs so far.

Btw so now it is ok to tell the 'enemy' the gap of the security?
pirossalma is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:19 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
Originally Posted by CaptainMiles
Did anyone else pick up on Pissy's statement that kids under 12 (or was it 12 and under) can opt out of the NoS and not get the pat down?

New strategy, folks. We can now take our shampoo again. Just have your kids carry the shampoo in their diapers.
Actually, I believe what he said is that kids 12 and under would not receive "that level of patdown," or something to that effect. What I got from it was that they would not be getting the "enhanced" standard patdown, but the old standard patdown. I really wish Lauer had asked the follow-up - what WILL happen to those 12 and under? Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Which takes my level of pissed-offedness, on a scale of 1 to 10, down from an 11 to a 10. I thought about whether I'd be ok with some TSA employee doing a previously standard standard patdown on my 5 year old if I were watching closely and, well, no dice.

Also, on the images of the men's bodies they showed on the piece, you could make out the guy's organ quite clearly. Also also, they showed toward the end what is a cartoonish figure with yellow squares all over the body, apparently representing what passengers and TSA employees at the gate can see. No commentary, just an assumption on my part. A far cry from what the person behind the curtain has to assess "in a matter of seconds."

Last edited by gobluetwo; Nov 15, 2010 at 7:25 am
gobluetwo is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:22 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LIS/ATL/other
Programs: UA 1K, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Plat, Marriott Gold, HH Silver
Posts: 1,983
Originally Posted by pirossalma
But probably the same targeted soccer moms will be very angry, when they meet the reality: TSO's have not got the memo on this new rule. Deifinitely kids have not been exempted from pat-downs so far.
People will kids should get that clip from Pistole on their phones, to play to the TSOs that have not yet gotten the memo on the policy.
CaptainMiles is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:26 am
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
Actually, I believe what he said is that kids 12 and under would not receive "that level of patdown," or something to that effect. What I got from it was that they would not be getting the "enhanced" standard patdown, but the old standard patdown. I really wish Lauer had asked the follow-up - what WILL happen to those 12 and under? Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Which takes my level of pissed-offedness, on a scale of 1 to 10, down from an 11 to a 10. I thought about whether I'd be ok with some TSA employee doing a previously standard standard patdown on my 5 year old if I were watching closely and, well, no dice.

Also, on the images of the men's bodies they showed on the piece, you could make out the guy's organ quite clearly. Also also, they showed toward the end what is a cartoonish figure with yellow squares all over the body, apparently representing what passengers and TSA employees at the gate can see. No commentary, just an assumption on my part. A far cry from what the person behind the curtain has to assess "in a matter of seconds."
If they showed that image, it was duplicitous because that's the ATR image which the TSA says isn't up to their "standards" and is not used in the US although it is used abroad.
doober is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:33 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
Originally Posted by doober
If they showed that image, it was duplicitous because that's the ATR image which the TSA says isn't up to their "standards" and is not used in the US although it is used abroad.
At least on CNN, I was taking that box to be a floating magnifying tool, something similar to photoshop. Move it around, to zoom in on the area in question. And the images they showed didn't leave much to the imagination, with highlights/lowlights showing every curve of the torso and genitals, including closeups using the tool.

I'm not picking sides, yet at least this shows the public the tools used, so they can make up their own mind of how to act/react.
sbagdon is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:33 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Dirt Status w/ All
Posts: 5,040
He was also on CNN American Morning after the Fox bit. John Roberts did press him on the claims that NoS would not have detected the underwear bomber. He basically said "it would have (trust us)" and went on about how they had to make everyone on the plane feel that every other passenger had been screened properly and there were no box cutters or bombs on board. He also hinted there might be some compromise coming with pilots.
tev9999 is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 7:50 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
He was on Fox and Friends a few minutes ago. He got a nice reception from Brian. Disappointing.
Of course. The networks don't do real news any more. They just spout the government party line.

Originally Posted by doober
Tossing out crumbs to the masses with the hope of shutting them up.
That and the Pilots - intended to divide and conquer the public.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 8:14 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by CaptainMiles
Did anyone else pick up on Pissy's statement that kids under 12 (or was it 12 and under) can opt out of the NoS and not get the pat down?

New strategy, folks. We can now take our shampoo again. Just have your kids carry the shampoo in their diapers.

I didn't hear the show but I can say that whether a fluke or not, neither me, my wife or six year old daughter were asked to go through the MMW at DTW or RDU over the weekend. We were ready to "Opt out".
There was a radio snippet from Napolitano this morning and an "independent expert" sound bite saying the scanners are great.
ZFlyer72 is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 8:27 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Exactly where I want to be
Programs: IHG Gold,SPG Gold, HH Gold, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Delta Kettle, AMEX Plat, DL AMEX Plat
Posts: 1,434
It was a little sad to see the old boxcutters, shoe bomb examples trotted out yet again. Lauer was a little soft, but did mention the touching of "private parts". There's only so much one can do in a 3 minute interview...

The "irresponsible" reply about Opt-out Day gave me the feeling that heavy retributions will be brought onto anyone daring to "disrupt and delay" fellow passengers that day. He did misspeak on this - he said that those of us who opt out don't want to go through any scanning. Wrongo. I'd be OK with the old status quo - WTMD and a light patdown. Maybe those traveling on 11/24 need to be at the airport 4 hours ahead of their flights...Wanna bet that they staff down on the female TSOs who work that day???

Last edited by slidergirl; Nov 15, 2010 at 8:36 am
slidergirl is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 8:42 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Originally Posted by slidergirl
It was a little sad to see the old boxcutters, shoe bomb examples trotted out yet again. Lauer was a little soft, but did mention the touching of "private parts". There's only so much one can do in a 3 minute interview...

The "irresponsible" reply about Opt-out Day gave me the feeling that heavy retributions will be brought onto anyone daring to "disrupt and delay" fellow passengers that day. He did misspeak on this - he said that those of us who opt out don't want to go through any scanning. Wrongo. I'd be OK with the old status quo - WTMD and a light patdown. Maybe those traveling on 11/24 need to be at the airport 4 hours ahead of their flights...Wanna bet that they staff down on the female TSOs who work that day???
If pissy and the TSA goon squad want to try that there going to have cameras covering there every move.

Personally i have 3 different cameras I will have on me and that 2 of the 3 will have capability to relay video and photo over wireless back to my car in the parking lot which then will upload them to my secure server. It would only take a single text message to a friend of mine to go in grab those videos and publish them to Youtube and have copies on newsroom editors desks very shortly.

TSA causing people to miss there flights because of there tactics could backfire and the travelers and airlines coming after them for fees, and other losses
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 8:47 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
I, too, was disappointed with the "storming the cockpit with boxcutters" example, especially. Ever since they've battoned down the hatches, so to speak, it seems unlikely that this would work.

I've also always wanted to ask if they've ever had to undergo the invasive patdowns, or if they would allow their teenager to be subjected to it.
gobluetwo is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010, 9:00 am
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by slidergirl
It was a little sad to see the old boxcutters, shoe bomb examples trotted out yet again. Lauer was a little soft, but did mention the touching of "private parts". There's only so much one can do in a 3 minute interview...
I couldn't watch the whole clip. Pistole was making me ill, and I only have one laptop.

The checkpoint video was great, however, and I doubt the despots got a net gain of converts from this interview. They clearly showed people being groped, front & back, top & bottom, including one white-haired grandma who got her boobs checked out. As long as realistic video of the searches is run, Pistole loses.

Their arrogance & intransigence is just incredible. I can't recall any worse example at the federal level in the 5-6 decades that I've been around. Let them keep at it. The deeper they dig themselves in, the more likely we are simply to abolish die Transportsturmabteilung.

Last edited by MikeMpls; Nov 15, 2013 at 4:41 pm
MikeMpls is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.