![]() |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 14960033)
Just my take. Disney can manage massive crowds of people of all nationalities without any yelling. Hire Disney to setup TSA checkpoints.
Any regular Baltimore flyers want to comment? |
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14958778)
.. since nobody knows the rules (since we have like 124321789313464515 rules), we tend to make sure passengers can hear. I wish there was an easier way to do it.
A simple, well-placed, large type, concise sign would be much more effective. |
Originally Posted by greggwiggins
(Post 14960502)
Actually, Disney was brought in as a consultant in the early days of TSA; they helped design the screening checkpoints at (at least) BWI with creating an efficient passenger flow in mind.
Any regular Baltimore flyers want to comment? My guess is if Disney was indeed consulted, it would have been for the design of the A/B checkpoint? Any BWI'ers? |
Since I begain to read TS&S earlier this year, I have been counting. Counting 'please' and 'thank you' and 'you are welcome' around the world. Even on a busy holiday weekend at MUC I counted no less than 14 polite exchanges from me and the screener.
I hear 'may I' often instead of orders in other English speaking countries. I am asked at LHR if a spot check swab is going to make me late for my flight. I am beckoned over to a line with no wait with a smile and a cheerful good morning. I have been apologized to because only one lane was open and not two lanes early one morning, even though there were only a few people ahead of me. It is entirely possible to do all of this and still provide security. I sadly don't experience the same from the US. Simply choosing different words would improve the reputation of TSA, but it seems that there is always an excuse why that isn't possible. Request instead of demand, for instance. Some TSOs may do this, but it appears to be the norm elsewhere and the exception in the US at the airport screening. That might work at domestic terminals, but would probably not do so well at an international terminal, where many passengers don't speak a lick of english. I do agree that we shouldn't exactly yell, but maybe talking a little higher for people to hear us. |
Originally Posted by greggwiggins
(Post 14960502)
Actually, Disney was brought in as a consultant in the early days of TSA; they helped design the screening checkpoints at (at least) BWI with creating an efficient passenger flow in mind.
Any regular Baltimore flyers want to comment? I thought it was one of the big consulting firms (Booz, maybe) that came in and worked on passenger flow & screening procedures. Not that it really helped. The only checkpoints that are decent are the A/B checkpoints. And ALL of them have some of the worst personnel around. |
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14958896)
...might work at domestic terminals, but would probably not do so well at an international terminal, where many passengers don't speak a lick of english.
Passing through SFO two hours ago, I was reminded of the many reasons that TSA is not liked. Although the barkers were not out, I was given the evil eye when I said that I would prefer to push my property into the xray. :rolleyes: never happened in Sydney. Maybe we should send the clerks over to Sydney to learn some people skills. |
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14958896)
I know one screener at my terminal who is like that, screaming at the top of his ....ing lungs for no reason. Pisses me off..
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14958896)
... international terminal, where many passengers don't speak a lick of english.
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14958896)
I try to smile when I can, except when i'm working real fast at TDC (checking tickets), unless it's slow. I agree. Smiling does go a long way sometimes.
|
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 14961781)
Maybe we should send the clerks over to Sydney to learn some people skills.
|
I mean, who really cares about Australia? I mean, they're all like "g'day mate". This is the US of A.
AMERICA. .... YEA. ....ing kangaroos. |
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14962703)
I mean, who really cares about Australia? I mean, they're all like "g'day mate". This is the US of A.
AMERICA. .... YEA. ....ing kangaroos. Oprah's coming.:eek: |
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 14962664)
They won't get anything out of it. At most, they'll just tell Sydney "You're doing it wrong".
|
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
(Post 14963245)
Or worse, they'll like Sydney and want to stay. :eek:
|
Originally Posted by senseker
(Post 14962703)
I mean, who really cares about Australia? I mean, they're all like "g'day mate". This is the US of A.
AMERICA. .... YEA. ....ing kangaroos. |
lol @ VH-RMD :D
In this country we do like to travel without succumbing to the moronic requirements of removing our shoes or producing I'd for a rentacop at the screening point in order to travel. Hell, we can even carry liquids on board our flights, and the planes aren't falling out of the sky. As a humble Australian, I'm going to ask the posters to scratch their suggestions of sending TSA boors down under to learn a thing or few about respectful conduct at checkpoints, lest their hairbrained ideas surrounding IDs liquids gels and shoes seep through :D @senseeker: ever wonder why people (americans and furriners alike) find your mob so annoying? Your last post holds the answer. |
Originally Posted by SQ421
(Post 14964991)
Hell, we can even carry liquids on board our flights, and the planes aren't falling out of the sky.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.