![]() |
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 14904721)
You mean, out of an Abundance of Caution :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Tom M.
(Post 14904369)
From another source:
When the employees asked the man for identification, the man ran off, drove away and has not been located. http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/news/...ncident_100710 "U.S. Customs and Border Protection is now checking luggage for drugs and cash, Fox 29's Dave Schratwieser reported Thursday afternoon from the airport." A totally unfounded wild guess here, but I think the drug angle is actually plausible here-- the unknown person tosses a bag (not connected with any on-board passenger) filled with drugs, etc. onto the airplane, intended to be picked up by a co-hort at the destination. (though wouldn't it be more likely that it would be coming INTO the US rather than leaving?) Brings up an interesting question - if they come across anything illegal in an onboard-passenger's bag during the search, how will the 'probable cause' issue come into play, since they're specifically stating they're looking for drugs/cash as opposed to a bomb, etc.? |
Originally Posted by Maxwell Smart
(Post 14904741)
From that same article:
"U.S. Customs and Border Protection is now checking luggage for drugs and cash, Fox 29's Dave Schratwieser reported Thursday afternoon from the airport." A totally unfounded wild guess here, but I think the drug angle is actually plausible here-- the unknown person tosses a bag (not connected with any on-board passenger) filled with drugs, etc. onto the airplane, intended to be picked up by a co-hort at the destination. (though wouldn't it be more likely that it would be coming INTO the US rather than leaving?) Brings up an interesting question - if they come across anything illegal in an onboard-passenger's bag during the search, how will the 'probable cause' issue come into play, since they're specifically stating they're looking for drugs/cash as opposed to a bomb, etc.? It would be cash, not drugs, if they find anything. |
Originally Posted by coachrowsey
(Post 14904584)
Fox News just said no threat :rolleyes: but they still haven't found the un badged person. Interesting to say the least.
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 14904721)
You mean,
|
Originally Posted by Superguy
(Post 14905643)
Fixed it for you. ;)
It's definitely true! |
It appeared that the man in question was properly credentialed to be in a secure area, but was working on a plane that he wasn't supposed to, FBI spokesman J.J. Klaver said. When he was questioned by the other baggage handlers, the person left in a baggage loading cart, he said.
So a badged ramper was working the wrong flight. This is cause for calling back an aircraft and searching everyone? :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by N965VJ
(Post 14906238)
[I][URL="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/07/philadelphia.airport.security/index.html?hpt=T2"]So a badged ramper was working the wrong flight. This is cause for calling back an aircraft and searching everyone? :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by lostinthewash
(Post 14906326)
So much for pitching in, helping out, and getting the job done. This is a very clear message to the rampers ... don't go the extra mile - you'll be hunted down and questioned by the FBI. "that's not MY job" lives on ....
+1000, what a bunch of crap. And how these news people come up with the stuff they do is beyond me. That's why it is so hard to even attempt to make comments from the side lines on any of this stuff. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:25 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.