Community
Wiki Posts
Search

To be fair: Not everybody hates the TSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2010, 12:09 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TUS
Programs: DL Gold
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by JSmith1969
For instance, an IQ higher than room temperature.
Farenheit or Celcius?
Vecturist14 is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 5:46 am
  #62  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,520
Originally Posted by eyecue
Since I am reading about a lot of people saying that they work closely with aviation and everyone that they talk to in their circles tell them that they hate TSA. I have started to ask people that I work around about TSA. I have asked pilots, flight attendants, vendors etc. While I have gotten some interesting responses, NOT one of them has said anything close to what some of you are saying. The very constitution that you say is being trashed when you fly is also the basis for which TSA has to do some of what it does.
My brother is a commerical pilot. I can't repeat on a public forum what he tells me about TSA, both his opinion and those of his colleagues.

What part of the Constitution empowers TSA?

Originally Posted by exbayern
I don't believe that the vast majority of posters here woke up one day and decided that they didn't like TSA. Something drove most people to that point. TSA didn't earn its reputation by being polite and respectful and logical and effective.

I don't believe that Argenbright had the same reputation, nor does airport security in most other countries have the same reputation.
^^

Recently, Mrs. Halls120 and I have embarked on a new tactic at the checkpoint. We actually try to make eye contact with sullen and disgruntled TSO's and engage them in conversation. three out of four times all we get is a grunt in return.
halls120 is online now  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 6:26 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Silicon Valley
Programs: UA GS, WN A-List, AA Exec Plat, National Emerald
Posts: 1,020
I'm at the Norm Mineta Memorial San Jose Airport right now. And yes, I did say "Thank You" to the TSA.

Not because I think what they do is the most efficient, reasonable way to secure our airports. But because these particular individuals treated passengers with respect, patience.

And more important, they didn't make me put my To Boot New York shoes on the belt (I'm wearing these: http://amzn.to/bYaEFS ) and they didn't steal my pills (Modafinal/Provigil, which can go for $10 a pop on the black market ). For that, I thank them.
reamworks is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 7:06 am
  #64  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by reamworks
I'm at the Norm Mineta Memorial San Jose Airport right now. And yes, I did say "Thank You" to the TSA.

Not because I think what they do is the most efficient, reasonable way to secure our airports. But because these particular individuals treated passengers with respect, patience.

And more important, they didn't make me put my To Boot New York shoes on the belt (I'm wearing these: http://amzn.to/bYaEFS ) and they didn't steal my pills (Modafinal/Provigil, which can go for $10 a pop on the black market ). For that, I thank them.
Yes, you should be thankful for not being robbed or having your belongings damaged at a TSA checkpoint.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 7:51 am
  #65  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 555
Originally Posted by reamworks
I'm at the Norm Mineta Memorial San Jose Airport right now. And yes, I did say "Thank You" to the TSA.

Not because I think what they do is the most efficient, reasonable way to secure our airports. But because these particular individuals treated passengers with respect, patience.

And more important, they didn't make me put my To Boot New York shoes on the belt (I'm wearing these: http://amzn.to/bYaEFS ) and they didn't steal my pills (Modafinal/Provigil, which can go for $10 a pop on the black market ). For that, I thank them.

I would suggest we've reached a new low when we have to thank civil servants for acting with respect to the public, for doing their jobs properly, and/or for abstaining from theft.

~~ Irish
IrishDoesntFlyNow is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 7:58 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL, BHM, DUB, County Wexford
Programs: DL DM, AA ExPlt, Diamond HH, HY, BW, & Titanium Elite Marriott
Posts: 4,855
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Nah. I'm sure he will be back.

However, it does amaze me at the absolute arrogance here (NOT talking about you, CM, just in general). Despite what you think I and other employees are thanked on a daily basis. It does NOT mean everyone who thanks me agrees with all TSA policy; I would bet they do not.

But what amazes me is how the collective you dismiss such people, as I've seen you do so many times in other threads. I guess not many of you can actually see someone saying/believing "I don't agree with this policy, in fact I think it's stupid, but i support TSA in overall".

Just read through the threads where the FT community talks about the comments people make supportive of TSA in the media - contempt, dismissal, disdain.

Believe it or not, not everyone agrees with you. And surprising, they do not have to agree with you.
Are you really that gullable. I have said nice things to TSA! Why? It is simple, to grease the path! That is all! I want to go through without a hassle and if a kind word gets that accomplished, I can say it. Even if it is to an uneducated brainwashed governmental freedom taker employed by the Terrorist Support Agency!!!
EasternTraveler is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 8:09 am
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by birdstrike
That may be true for some, but I have hated the TSA from Day One. They were created in haste to serve a political agenda, not a security need. A week after 9/11 people everywhere were driving around with American flags fluttering from their vehicles and thus began the national insanity that has lasted to this day.

Almost ten years on and the TSA has nothing to show for the billions of dollars that have been wasted on them.

So, yes, I can believe the flag wavers politely say "That you for protecting me", but they don't know they have been had. The truly sad part of this, is even when TSA is finally revealed to have no clothes, there will still be no righteous anger. They will go with a whimper, not a bang.

When we're out of Afghanistan and the jihadi rhetoric has nothing left on which to feed, the TSA budget will be slowly siphoned away for other pet projects. Then will come the call to privatize and Argenbrite will quietly take back the reins.
I totally agree with every word here. The first paragraph should be repeated daily, at least!

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 8:32 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by exbayern
OP's survey seems to me like asking around in the office from colleagues 'Do you like me?' That puts people in the position of having to decide if they wish to be honest, or to continue to have a future good working relationship with the person.

In OP's case, as they are in a position of authority over the survey respondents, it is akin to the boss asking the subordinates 'Do you like me?' How does one expect the respondents to answer that question?

In fact, I believe that there may have been an episode of The Office centred around this very scenario.
I see it more like an armed LEO standing there, hand on holster, asking the driver of a car he just pulled over for speeding: "do you like and respect me?"
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 10:13 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 315
Originally Posted by ryan182
Really? Have you ever read the constitution? Clearly you have not because a) nothing in the constitution in anyway provides the basis for what the TSA does. b) the constitution mostly defines protections from government rather than defines things government can, should or must do.

Let me guess, public school?
Let me guess, another elitist TS&S poster?

TB

Originally Posted by JSmith1969
For instance, an IQ higher than room temperature.
That sword should cut both ways...if that were indeed a requirement for posting to TS&S, I'm sure we would have a bit less "traffic."

TB

Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Oct 6, 2010 at 4:31 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts
TerminalBliss is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 10:43 am
  #70  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
Originally Posted by TerminalBliss
That sword should cut both ways...if that were indeed a requirement for posting to TS&S, I'm sure we would have a bit less "traffic."

TB
Particularly from 'Anonymous' and other blog posters who are allegedly TSOs.

Why would alleged TSOs continually advise passengers to read the website so they can know what to expect at the checkpoint and be prepared? Why would they say this when passengers are routinely told at the checkpoint that the website is wrong or out-of-date?

For that matter, why do the moderators allow these posts to stand uncorrected? Because there are so many of them?

Nothing like going to the blog and seeing posts by some of TSA's 'finest' displaying ignorance of their agency's posted rules and contempt for passengers.
chollie is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 11:23 am
  #71  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: United
Posts: 2,710
Well, eyecue hasn't been online since the 2nd so it seems like this was a post and run. That's a shame, I really want to know where the constitution authorizes the TSA.
Combat Medic is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 8:15 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by Combat Medic
Well, eyecue hasn't been online since the 2nd so it seems like this was a post and run. That's a shame, I really want to know where the constitution authorizes the TSA.
I'd love to hear his almost certainly delusional answer. In another post he states the Constitution doesn't apply to the TSA.

Originally Posted by eyecue
It [TSA searching] is an administrative action and not subject to the 4th ammendment.
And that we don't have the right to fly "on a whim"...

Originally Posted by eyecue
You are free to move around by walking and driving. You dont have the right to take a plane at your whim.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2010, 9:06 am
  #73  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 418
Originally Posted by Vecturist14
Farenheit or Celcius?
First one, then the other...
JSmith1969 is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2010, 11:07 am
  #74  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by Combat Medic
Well, eyecue hasn't been online since the 2nd so it seems like this was a post and run. That's a shame, I really want to know where the constitution authorizes the TSA.
Pretty sad that a person won't even show the backbone to support their position.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Oct 5, 2010, 2:10 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Pretty sad that a person won't even show the backbone to support their position.
Especially when he is the OP.
ScatterX is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.