![]() |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 14302671)
What does "work international flights" mean?
|
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 14302688)
Meaning do things like the OP described, do gate screening/ID checks on international flights.
But but but.... if you've gone through the TDC, done the WTMD or body scan or what ever and cleared into the sterile area. What's the purpose? Are you saying that people will exchange tickets and ID with a "bad guy" at Starbucks or Hudson News? If you don't do it right the first time, then why do it at all. As Colonel Potter used to say in M*A*S*H-------- horse hockey!! |
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 14302055)
If it was TSA screeners doing this, it was 100% harassment. If it was customs or ICE, it was about 90% harassment. I just want to make sure we lambaste the correct guilty
|
Originally Posted by ESpen36
(Post 14302252)
(Plus, they could always use the 100-mile rule, since it was a departure from JFK. ICE/Border Patrol claims the authority to stop and examine the documents of anybody who is within 100 miles of any land or maritime border of the United States.)
Originally Posted by kennycrudup
(Post 14302328)
Definately TSA Smurfs in my cases (ex-SFO in the Int'l Terminal A to a domestic destination).
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 14302688)
Meaning do things like the OP described, do gate screening/ID checks on international flights.
|
Originally Posted by N1120A
(Post 14303741)
And the Supreme Court has already stated that such practices are not legal.
Then it was whatever contract company handles SFO that did it Exqueze me. Begging powder? CBP has "authorized' you to conduct exit checks? I do not believe that for a second. |
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 14307795)
Exsqueeze you. I never said an exit check now did I? I said gate screening and ID checks. Those are during the boarding process.
Oh BTW, do you ever "find" anything ? |
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 14307918)
And how is that "working with CBP" ? Either the TSA is allowed, unlawful though it may be, to do Gate Nonsense or it isn't.
Oh BTW, do you ever "find" anything ? Have I personally found something? No not myself, but I am aware of a situation where the gate team spotted a ramp worker coming in off the ramp and handing an item to a passenger. |
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 14307990)
I never said "work with CBP". There are certain things, like international flights, or even domestic flights that operate out of gates with customs access from them, that require the additional clearance from CBP, but CBP is not standing up there with us doing this.
Have I personally found something? No not myself, but I am aware of a situation where the gate team spotted a ramp worker coming in off the ramp and handing an item to a passenger. |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 14308097)
And how did comparing ID and BP lead to that discovery?
|
Originally Posted by uavking
(Post 14301267)
In all seriousness, when presented with a gate ID check am I correct in assuming that I can ignore the request and continue walking without legal repercussions?
|
Originally Posted by PTravel
(Post 14308204)
No. The current CFR authorizes TSA to validate ID in order to board an aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 14307990)
I never said "work with CBP". There are certain things, like international flights, or even domestic flights that operate out of gates with customs access from them, that require the additional clearance from CBP, but CBP is not standing up there with us doing this.
|
Originally Posted by nhcowboy
(Post 14308280)
Alright, assuming the regulation is valid, how many times is TSA permitted to validate the same ID? This, after all, a gate check we're talking about. Assuming one could not have gotten to this point without having ID checked, what authority is there to demand that pax submit to second ID check?
|
Originally Posted by nhcowboy
(Post 14308280)
...what authority is there to demand that pax submit to second ID check?
|
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 14308913)
Yes, I misread your post but I'm not sure I understand this one either. The passengers do not require 'additional clearance' (from CBP) to be there but TSOs do ? Thought you were on the same team. :confused:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.