Problems at USA Immigration - Order of Protection
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,246
Problems at USA Immigration - Order of Protection
This topic came up recently and I didn't know the answer so I thought I would post it here. Upon returning to the states, a US Citizen was detained at Immigration (not customs) by the Dept of Homeland Security/Immigration Services because a red flag somehow popped up due to a current Order of Protection on the computer when the passport was scanned. This resulted an escort to a secondary office where a number of questions were asked concerning the purpose of the recent trip out of the country, who the pax was traveling with, where the pax lived and worked, and questions about if the pax had a criminal record. I was told an FBI report was pulled (or at least something was printed off that had the words FBI at the top).
What seemed strange to me was that this person was finally admitted into the country, proceeded to go through customs with zero problem. The person was never searched or even questioned about the contents of the luggage.
--So all that brought up the discussion...isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?
--Wouldn't it be Customs that would be concerned with a person's criminal record and the no contact order? And that might likely result in a search...idk.
THOUGHTS??
What seemed strange to me was that this person was finally admitted into the country, proceeded to go through customs with zero problem. The person was never searched or even questioned about the contents of the luggage.
--So all that brought up the discussion...isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?
--Wouldn't it be Customs that would be concerned with a person's criminal record and the no contact order? And that might likely result in a search...idk.
THOUGHTS??
Last edited by myfrogger; Apr 9, 2010 at 7:42 pm
#3
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 908
--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?
--Wouldn't it be Customs that would be concerned with a person's criminal record and the no contact order? And that might likely result in a search...idk.
#4
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
No, it would be Immigration not Customs. Perhaps:
--They suspected his US passport was fake and he was not automatically entitled to enter the US. (doesn't sound like this was the case though);
or more likely:
--He had some kind of outstanding US federal or Interpol flag on him, which would show up in Immigration's computers when they checked his passport. Since he apparently was let go, it must not have been an outright arrest warrant pending. Since he didn't get the once-over from Customs, it must not have been any kind of contraband/smuggling type issue, or the else the authorities covered this in his "private sessions" with the Feds.
--They suspected his US passport was fake and he was not automatically entitled to enter the US. (doesn't sound like this was the case though);
or more likely:
--He had some kind of outstanding US federal or Interpol flag on him, which would show up in Immigration's computers when they checked his passport. Since he apparently was let go, it must not have been an outright arrest warrant pending. Since he didn't get the once-over from Customs, it must not have been any kind of contraband/smuggling type issue, or the else the authorities covered this in his "private sessions" with the Feds.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,246
I came to the conclusion that a person with a criminal record is possibly more likely to be carrying contraband than one without...but I see that as a Customs issue (as mentioned) and not as an Immigration issue.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't pull people out occasionally because they've been travelling to countries that are "flagged" as unfriendly or to areas with issues. As noted above, you'd be let into the country but if there is an issue warranting arrest, it might be in handcuffs
#8
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Dirt Status w/ All
Posts: 5,040
Probably has a lot to do with the setup of immigration and customs. EVERYONE must go through immigration where your passport is scanned and the computer shows whatever information it knows about you. That would be the most logical time to pull someone for a warrant or other red flag. Customs is usually a sampling unless a dog or something else grabs their attention. Most people just get waived through customs.
They can't deny a US citizen entry, but they can arrest you in the process of allowing you entry if there is a warrant.
They can't deny a US citizen entry, but they can arrest you in the process of allowing you entry if there is a warrant.
#11
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 628
You have to remember that Customs and Immigration were merged back in 2003. It is one agency and the employees (CBP Officers) can be doing Customs work one hour and Immigration work the next. So you really can't separate them anymore in the US.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Had it been a red flag having to do with customs issues (what one is carrying), his stuff more likely than not would have been searched. If it is an immigration issue (who one is), then they are going to interview the person. Since it is the latter and not the former that was involved in this situation, it was an immigration issue, not a customs issue. That the agency is the same doesn't matter as far is this immigration vs. customs issue analysis is concerned..
#13
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. Lucie West,FL/Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by myfrogger
I came to the conclusion that a person with a criminal record is possibly more likely to be carrying contraband than one without.
#14
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 628
Had it been a red flag having to do with customs issues (what one is carrying), his stuff more likely than not would have been searched. If it is an immigration issue (who one is), then they are going to interview the person. Since it is the latter and not the former that was involved in this situation, it was an immigration issue, not a customs issue. That the agency is the same doesn't matter as far is this immigration vs. customs issue analysis is concerned.
The question I answered was:
isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
But it's now one continuous process. Before, the primary inspector (the one in the booth) was primarily concerned about immigration issues. Now that officer is responsible for both. It's not immigration first and customs second like it used to be. Both are done simultaneously.
Certainly at the first checkpoint they can make an indication on your customs form to ensure you get picked up at the customs checkpoint, but "both done simultaneously"? I definitely doubt that one...