Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Problems at USA Immigration - Order of Protection

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Problems at USA Immigration - Order of Protection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2010, 7:12 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,246
Problems at USA Immigration - Order of Protection

This topic came up recently and I didn't know the answer so I thought I would post it here. Upon returning to the states, a US Citizen was detained at Immigration (not customs) by the Dept of Homeland Security/Immigration Services because a red flag somehow popped up due to a current Order of Protection on the computer when the passport was scanned. This resulted an escort to a secondary office where a number of questions were asked concerning the purpose of the recent trip out of the country, who the pax was traveling with, where the pax lived and worked, and questions about if the pax had a criminal record. I was told an FBI report was pulled (or at least something was printed off that had the words FBI at the top).

What seemed strange to me was that this person was finally admitted into the country, proceeded to go through customs with zero problem. The person was never searched or even questioned about the contents of the luggage.

--So all that brought up the discussion...isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??

--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?

--Wouldn't it be Customs that would be concerned with a person's criminal record and the no contact order? And that might likely result in a search...idk.

THOUGHTS??

Last edited by myfrogger; Apr 9, 2010 at 7:42 pm
myfrogger is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 7:31 pm
  #2  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
Why would you assume there is a need to search bags? Customs issues are completely separate from immigration ones.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 7:36 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by myfrogger
--So all that brought up the discussion...isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
I believe it should be, and in most other countries it is, but sadly the DHS thinks otherwise.

--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?
No.

--Wouldn't it be Customs that would be concerned with a person's criminal record and the no contact order? And that might likely result in a search...idk.
Customs is only concerned with what stuff you are bringing into the country.
König is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 7:38 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
No, it would be Immigration not Customs. Perhaps:

--They suspected his US passport was fake and he was not automatically entitled to enter the US. (doesn't sound like this was the case though);
or more likely:
--He had some kind of outstanding US federal or Interpol flag on him, which would show up in Immigration's computers when they checked his passport. Since he apparently was let go, it must not have been an outright arrest warrant pending. Since he didn't get the once-over from Customs, it must not have been any kind of contraband/smuggling type issue, or the else the authorities covered this in his "private sessions" with the Feds.
jiejie is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 7:40 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,246
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
Why would you assume there is a need to search bags? Customs issues are completely separate from immigration ones.
I am just trying to come up on reasons/ideas why any US Citizen would need secondary screening by the DHS.

I came to the conclusion that a person with a criminal record is possibly more likely to be carrying contraband than one without...but I see that as a Customs issue (as mentioned) and not as an Immigration issue.
myfrogger is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 8:52 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
Originally Posted by myfrogger
--So all that brought up the discussion...isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
Nope. They also can run your name through the computer to search for any outstanding warrants. If they find you in violation of the law or that you have outstanding warrants, they can arrest you

--Can a US Citizen be denied entry back into the USA for any reason?
No. But, again, if they find you in violation of laws or that you have outstanding warrants, they can arrest (or at least detain until the jurisdiction that issued the warrant decides whether it would be worth it to arrange extradition).
ESpen36 is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 9:15 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't pull people out occasionally because they've been travelling to countries that are "flagged" as unfriendly or to areas with issues. As noted above, you'd be let into the country but if there is an issue warranting arrest, it might be in handcuffs
GoingAway is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 9:42 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Dirt Status w/ All
Posts: 5,040
Probably has a lot to do with the setup of immigration and customs. EVERYONE must go through immigration where your passport is scanned and the computer shows whatever information it knows about you. That would be the most logical time to pull someone for a warrant or other red flag. Customs is usually a sampling unless a dog or something else grabs their attention. Most people just get waived through customs.

They can't deny a US citizen entry, but they can arrest you in the process of allowing you entry if there is a warrant.
tev9999 is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2010, 10:46 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 4,784
Where was the person coming from. Single male passenger going to SE Asia many times can be a flag.
FlyingUnderTheRadar is online now  
Old Apr 10, 2010, 1:50 am
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,246
Originally Posted by FlyingUnderTheRadar
Where was the person coming from. Single male passenger going to SE Asia many times can be a flag.
Single male traveling back from Central America.
myfrogger is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2010, 5:43 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 628
Originally Posted by myfrogger
isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
You have to remember that Customs and Immigration were merged back in 2003. It is one agency and the employees (CBP Officers) can be doing Customs work one hour and Immigration work the next. So you really can't separate them anymore in the US.
Deeg is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2010, 3:41 pm
  #12  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by Deeg
You have to remember that Customs and Immigration were merged back in 2003. It is one agency and the employees (CBP Officers) can be doing Customs work one hour and Immigration work the next. So you really can't separate them anymore in the US.
Sure you can; the issue is at what point in the process the flag and secondary came up, not the agency that did it.

Had it been a red flag having to do with customs issues (what one is carrying), his stuff more likely than not would have been searched. If it is an immigration issue (who one is), then they are going to interview the person. Since it is the latter and not the former that was involved in this situation, it was an immigration issue, not a customs issue. That the agency is the same doesn't matter as far is this immigration vs. customs issue analysis is concerned..
Ari is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2010, 9:34 pm
  #13  
KTW
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. Lucie West,FL/Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by myfrogger
I came to the conclusion that a person with a criminal record is possibly more likely to be carrying contraband than one without.
They are never going to know of a criminal record unless extra checks are made. That is not automatic info they have in front of them.
KTW is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2010, 5:41 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 628
Originally Posted by Ari
Sure you can; the issue is at what point in the process the flag and secondary came up, not the agency that did it.
But it's now one continuous process. Before, the primary inspector (the one in the booth) was primarily concerned about immigration issues. Now that officer is responsible for both. It's not immigration first and customs second like it used to be. Both are done simultaneously.

Originally Posted by Ari
Had it been a red flag having to do with customs issues (what one is carrying), his stuff more likely than not would have been searched. If it is an immigration issue (who one is), then they are going to interview the person. Since it is the latter and not the former that was involved in this situation, it was an immigration issue, not a customs issue. That the agency is the same doesn't matter as far is this immigration vs. customs issue analysis is concerned.
Sure it does. Prior to the merger, it would not have been considered an immigration issue because the person was a US citizen. INS didn't mess with US citizens. The more logical division you mentioned (what one has vs. who one is) was only made possible by the agencies merging together and joining authorities.

The question I answered was:

isn't the job of Immigration simply to determine if that pax has the legal right/ability to enter the country??
Prior to March 2003, the answer to that would be yes. Since then (the creation date of DHS), the answer is no, as I explained.
Deeg is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2010, 7:19 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
Originally Posted by Deeg
But it's now one continuous process. Before, the primary inspector (the one in the booth) was primarily concerned about immigration issues. Now that officer is responsible for both. It's not immigration first and customs second like it used to be. Both are done simultaneously.
What are you basing this on? If this were true, why is there still a customs checkpoint that you have to pass through after immigration? How is the immigration officer (first checkpoint) in a position to check your bags for customs violations when you haven't picked them up yet?

Certainly at the first checkpoint they can make an indication on your customs form to ensure you get picked up at the customs checkpoint, but "both done simultaneously"? I definitely doubt that one...
star_world is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.