Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

JFK Ground Security: Body found in ex-JFK DL 777

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

JFK Ground Security: Body found in ex-JFK DL 777

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2010, 9:42 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: AA EXP, AAirpass, & CK 2MM, MR Plat Premier, DL Plat, US Plat, UA RECOVERING GS
Posts: 2,620
JFK Ground Security: Body found in ex-JFK DL 777

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapc...ex.html?hpt=T2

Wow. So while I'm tossing my deadly shampoo, someone walks up to a 777 bound for NRT, climbs in the nose gear, and hangs out until the flight takes off. Good going TSA!!

I remember a couple similar examples of people trying to evade immigration rules by doing the exact same thing, however, to the best of my knowledge all those flights originated OUTSIDE the US where the TSA was not directly responsible for securing the sterile area.
DillMan is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 10:02 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by DillMan
Wow. So while I'm tossing my deadly shampoo, someone walks up to a 777 bound for NRT, climbs in the nose gear, and hangs out until the flight takes off. Good going TSA!!
Most passengers can't, or don't see things down on the tarmac, hence the security theater doesn't have "tarmac" on the playbill.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 10:35 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,597
I thought most airports had security driving around the tarmac looking for suspicious activity..
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 11:15 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
I thought most airports had security driving around the tarmac looking for suspicious activity..
Oh you silly, silly Wabbit....everyone knows that tewowists are disguised as 80 yr. old grandmas in wheel chairs carrying large toothpaste tubes...why would anyone waste their time down on the tarmac?
N231LA is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 12:49 pm
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
It's a sad loss, but the person could have climbed in there with a stack of explosives and taken out the nose gear mechanics completely - which would have certainly terrorized the passengers for the remainder of the flight as they fretted over what would most certainly end up as a crash landing.

Nice to know people are paying attention to who is running around the ramp.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 1:05 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: UA, SWA, HA, Qantas
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by bocastephen
It's a sad loss, but the person could have climbed in there with a stack of explosives and taken out the nose gear mechanics completely - which would have certainly terrorized the passengers for the remainder of the flight as they fretted over what would most certainly end up as a crash landing.

Nice to know people are paying attention to who is running around the ramp.
But your scenario couldn't really happen. As many people here on FT postulate, it is a very very slim chance of anyone really wanting to do anything bad to an airline or airliner.
bbc1969 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 1:09 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by bbc1969
But your scenario couldn't really happen. As many people here on FT postulate, it is a very very slim chance of anyone really wanting to do anything bad to an airline or airliner.
True, but the TSA has this fetish with the risk avoidance model for passengers. Events like this are newsworthy when you have that strategy in place.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 1:12 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
Originally Posted by bbc1969
But your scenario couldn't really happen. As many people here on FT postulate, it is a very very slim chance of anyone really wanting to do anything bad to an airline or airliner.
When did I ever say that??

I said frequently that threats from the ground, cargo and through-the-fence operations posed a far greater threat to aviation than someone at the passenger checkpoint - and the TSA was ignoring/mishandling these other weaknesses at our peril.

Of course I didn't expect the US government to personally escort a terrorist on a flight so he could blow up his underpants and scare everyone into a tizzy again - so go figure.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 1:14 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 22
How good could security be?
A man who is not intelligent enough the realize that you will freeze to death at 30k feet or put in the time and effort to see if its possible to stow away in landing gear can make it onto the runway and into a plane.
heineken42 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 1:43 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: UA, SWA, HA, Qantas
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by bocastephen
When did I ever say that??

I said frequently that threats from the ground, cargo and through-the-fence operations posed a far greater threat to aviation than someone at the passenger checkpoint - and the TSA was ignoring/mishandling these other weaknesses at our peril.

Of course I didn't expect the US government to personally escort a terrorist on a flight so he could blow up his underpants and scare everyone into a tizzy again - so go figure.
Just joking.... But you are entirely correct about ground/cargo/thru the fence operations being a concern.

TSA has a limited presence on the tarmac near hard stands and jetway areas. Not that they don't go there, but their presence is not what it is at the checkpoint and other inside the terminal areas.

Maybe that is a good thing, as TSA (especially the screening folks) get hammered for "mission creep" very often.

The tarmac and perimeter are the responsibility of the Airport Police in most cases. Airline personnel also hold responsibility for monitoring the security of their aircraft. Responsibility for missing someone in the nosewheel bay goes right on up to the pilot performing the walkaround inspection (if done before the person climbed in there).
bbc1969 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010, 10:28 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rio Rancho, NM - USA
Programs: DL, UA, WN, Amtrak, Hyatt, Accor
Posts: 1,793
When it comes to airline safety and security, this is one of the more frightening stories. I'm surprised there aren't more posts on this thread. Obviously, there is NO security on the tarmac at JFK. Appalling.
Dianne47 is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2010, 4:06 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by Dianne47
When it comes to airline safety and security, this is one of the more frightening stories. I'm surprised there aren't more posts on this thread. Obviously, there is NO security on the tarmac at JFK. Appalling.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/newss...ta-flight.html
alanR is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2010, 7:04 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,522
Originally Posted by bocastephen
When did I ever say that??

I said frequently that threats from the ground, cargo and through-the-fence operations posed a far greater threat to aviation than someone at the passenger checkpoint - and the TSA was ignoring/mishandling these other weaknesses at our peril.

Of course I didn't expect the US government to personally escort a terrorist on a flight so he could blow up his underpants and scare everyone into a tizzy again - so go figure.
Almost three years ago, an interagency working group chartered by NSC to study aviation security delivered the first draft of their report. It concluded that the greatest danger to aviation was "under the wing" security. Because this report didn't meet the needs of Kip Hawley and Chairman Chertoff, the report was "withdrawn for further development" and never reissued. Seems as if the Kipster and his Chairman couldn't stand having a report that exposed the fallacy of their Kabuki theater approach, and made sure the report was never released.
halls120 is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2010, 7:20 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by bbc1969
Just jokingTSA has a limited presence on the tarmac near hard stands and jetway areas. Not that they don't go there, but their presence is not what it is at the checkpoint and other inside the terminal areas.
Ron already showed us how dangerous an aircraft carrier flight deck is at night, I can only imagine the TSA being on the tarmac is nearly the same...

Originally Posted by bbc1969
Maybe that is a good thing, as TSA (especially the screening folks) get hammered for "mission creep" very often.
Their mission reep is mission creep to things like airline revenue enforcement, airport vendor revenue enforcement, and local law enforcement. Doing their actual job and securing things like the tarmac and airport edges isn't mission creep, its air travel security as well as common sense.
avsfan733 is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2010, 7:37 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
The body found at NRT was likely of a Nigerian man who climbed into the wheel well in LOS.

The 777 equipment used on this flight previously flew:

LOS-ATL
ATL-JFK

Then finally flew JFK-NRT where the body was found.
SDF_Traveler is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.