![]() |
Originally Posted by C. Howitt Fealz
(Post 13279724)
Doesn't the SOP say photography of checkpoints is perfectly legal, with the exception of the X-ray monitors?
/sarcasm. |
Out of job
Originally Posted by tsadude1
(Post 13276057)
Stay home and dont subject yourself to it then. ;)
|
Originally Posted by tsadude1
(Post 13276057)
Stay home and dont subject yourself to it then. ;)
|
Originally Posted by tsadude1
(Post 13279722)
Should I get you some tissue paper? If you have a clear cut case of such profiling as you came, then take it to court or stop your whining. Prove it, just dont cry about it on some forum. Here, Ill even help you get started, http://www.adl.org/ http://www.splcenter.org/index.jsp
Stating a fact is not whining. But you can't swallow it because of the bigotry, which you have amply displayed in your posts. |
Originally Posted by DIFIN
(Post 13277698)
A TSO, after I complained about him opening factory sealed boxs of film, said to me " if you don't like it leave the country".
that was at PDX a few years ago :mad: |
Some TSA personnel are suspicious by banking standards in that they choose to search people's personal articles which includes those of monetary value.
|
Originally Posted by DIFIN
(Post 13277698)
A TSO, after I complained about him opening factory sealed boxs of film, said to me " if you don't like it leave the country".
that was at PDX a few years ago :mad: response to said tso: if you like your job and would like to keep your job, please summon your supervisor, the tsa terminal manager for this terminal, the federal security director for this airport, the <insert airline name> ground services coordinator for this airport and a representative from law enforcement. you have 5 minutes to do so and i'll wait right here while you do. if after 5 minutes, there is no action on your part, i make a phone call. |
Commuting into Mahnattan every day I've seen things I never would have seen if I wasn't. It was just a couple of weeks ago on the train in from White Plains I saw somebody use the tefillin. He was sitting across from me.
Did I think Terrorism? Of course not. Nobody was paying any attention, so if there was something unusual, it was in that I had never been exposed to that before. A week or two ago when a friend posted on facebook that a plane was diverted for the same reason, I couldn't believe it. In my mind I could not picture any sane adult sitting there seeing the exact same thing I saw a week ago and thinking it was anything other then what I did, something totally harmless that I was not familiar with. What is suspicious to one person, as already mentioned, is perfectly acceptable to others. Common sense, logic, and reason has to come into play at some point. That's the missing part in all of this, there's no common sense, logic, or reason being applied, just people reacting to things they find unusual in a closed minded way. |
Originally Posted by tsadude1
(Post 13276057)
Stay home and dont subject yourself to it then. ;)
Good advice...for those TSO's who complain they are underappreciated, overstressed, underpaid and not always happy with their management. :rolleyes: |
what we've been able to gather about TSA airport photography policies
Originally Posted by C. Howitt Fealz
(Post 13279724)
Doesn't the SOP say photography of checkpoints is perfectly legal, with the exception of the X-ray monitors?
TSA's standard operating procedures are designated by TSA as "sensitive security information" which is a class of document that is not classified, but not provided to just anyone who asks. So it's difficult to determine just what's in their SOP. Bits and pieces are discovered via FOIA requests, and one of their SOP manuals was recently discovered to have been published on federal business opportunities Web site. Here's what we do know (or what I know, but I'm paying fairly close attention to this, out of general interest and because it directly affects me): Bob Burns at TSA wrote about this in a January 31, 2009 post to the TSA blog titled "Can I Take Photos at the Checkpoint and Airport?" (emphasis added): Unfortunately, there isn't a cookie cutter answer that can be applied to all of our screening locations and airports. It’s important to note that we know there’s a difference between someone taking a casual photo and someone doing surveillance, but if you are taking pictures at or near the checkpoint, don’t be surprised if someone (TSA, airport police, or a curious passenger) asks you what you’re up to. We don’t prohibit public, passengers or press from photographing, videotaping, or filming at screening locations. You can take pictures at our checkpoints as long as you’re not interfering with the screening process or slowing things down. We also ask that you do not film or take pictures of our monitors. However… while the TSA does not prohibit photographs at screening locations, local laws, state statutes, or local ordinances might. Your best bet is to call ahead and see what that specific airport’s policy is. I suggest you use the Got Feedback program to directly contact the Customer Support Manager at the airport you’re going to be traveling through. They will have an answer for you and if they don’t, they can connect you with somebody who does. Of course, if you’re a member of the press, you should contact the TSA Office of Public Affairs. I’ve taken photographs in checkpoints, terminals, and on planes and I have never had an issue. I know some of you have and hopefully this information helps you a little. After several people failed to understand the difference between a request and a requirement, I reminded them that Bob at TSA said that people are asked not to photograph monitors at TSA search stations. Someone still doesn't understand: "Right there stating that TSA does not want you to take pictures of their monitors." Sir or madam, I don't believe I care what TSA staff want any more than they care what I want. Regardless, Bob did not write anything about a policy prohibiting such photography, only that TSA discourages it by asking people not to do it. See the difference? See also: definitions of: request, demand, ask, and require. Phil, for Pete's sake, I was trying to be friendly with my language, but if you really need me to spell it out: Y O U M U S T N O T T A K E A N Y P H O T O G R A P H S O F T H E M O N I T O R S. Now here is something that I probably could have explained a little better: X-rays, Explosive Trace Portals, Explosive Trace Detection Machines, and Explosive Detection Systems all have monitors and must not be photogrpahed. Bob, please cut the folksiness. This is a matter of restricting people's freedom of movement and their ability to document the actions of their government, not the rules at local swimming pool. Please don't try to be "friendly" if it means being inaccurate. Just show us the rules you require us to follow. Assuming that your later statement takes precedence over your earlier one, could you be more specific? Is it unlawful for us to do so, or is it simply a condition that you place on our ability to cross your airport checkpoints? If it is unlawful, please cite the law. If it is simply a rule that applies to someone who wishes to cross your checkpoint, then it should be lawful to take photographs, then leave before crossing the checkpoint, right? I took Bob's advice about using "Got Feedback?" to contact airports directly. I submitted the form once for each of 50 major U.S. airports. About half of them eventually responded. I documented the entire process, publishing every e-mail message exchanged between the TSA airport representatives who responded and me, here on FlyerTalk. Bob refused to allow any comments on the TSA blog that linked to the relevant FlyerTalk thread, purportedly because I had published contact information for TSA's airport "customer service managers" -- who are to be public points-of-contact. What I published were the e-mails those people sent in response to a query that was submitted on the Web. They didn't know who their e-mails were going to; anyone, or even a machine, could have generated those queries. So it's not as if they trusted me, or anyone in particular, with the information. And it was their work contact information -- work they perform by interacting with the public as public employees. In that FlyerTalk thread, in addition to correspondence with TSA and an index thereof, I posted a list of what I considered causes for concern with the responses. TSA representatives provided conflicting and sometimes threatening information. The thread was later messed up a bit by a FlyerTalk moderator who combined multiple posts by me, as reportedly is their policy when someone posts multiple times one-after-another, so some of the links are broken, but everything is still there. See also the following FlyerTalk threads about people's experiences with photography and videotaping at and near TSA airport checkpoints:
|
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 13281157)
Do yourself and all of us a favour
Stating a fact is not whining. But you can't swallow it because of the bigotry, which you have amply displayed in your posts. |
Since several members can't seem to play nice in this thread and instead throw insults back and forth at each other, we're going to close the thread.
________________________ Cholula TS/S Co-Moderator |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:09 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.