Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2009, 2:19 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 2P
Posts: 707
Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

"Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID
Nov 16th, 2009 by sherri

Today a traveler going through the Albuquerque airport was detained and is reportedly in the process of arrest after politely refusing to show his ID. Phil Mocek, a Seattle area native, was traveling with his friend Jesse Gallagos when he politely declined to show ID to TSA agents."


Full piece here:
http://philosecurity.org/2009/11/16/...ing-to-show-id

From the name and links I'm guessing that this is the same pmocek that posts here on FT in this very forum.

Anyone have any updates?
Random_Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:29 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by Random_Flyer
"Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID
Nov 16th, 2009 by sherri

Today a traveler going through the Albuquerque airport was detained and is reportedly in the process of arrest after politely refusing to show his ID. Phil Mocek, a Seattle area native, was traveling with his friend Jesse Gallagos when he politely declined to show ID to TSA agents."


Full piece here:
http://philosecurity.org/2009/11/16/...ing-to-show-id

From the name and links I'm guessing that this is the same pmocek that posts here on FT in this very forum.

Anyone have any updates?
This should get interesting. Keep us posted.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:30 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
Depending on how this moves forward is there any means to coordinate a defense fund for Phil?
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:34 am
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Good for Phil!!!!! Yes, TK, this could get very interesting. Phil hit all sorts of hot buttons at once. I admire him.

If you read Sherri's blog a little further you will see that apparently her doctor's office is requiring a photo ID each and every time a patient comes in for a visit - in compliance with some FTC rule, allegedly designed to stop identity theft. Seems to me the more often one is required to have one's ID available for review and scanning, the greater the chance of having one's identity stolen.

Photo ID to see doctor
doober is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:37 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Arrested? Bizarre. I hope that TSO and cop have deep pockets.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:39 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,199
Does anyone know how to reach Phil or his travel companion? If he hasn't already been booked and arraigned, it looks like they're just going to hold him there to make a point and show off how tough they are - I hope he has legal counsel and pursues this matter through the courts.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:42 am
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Does anyone know how to reach Phil or his travel companion? If he hasn't already been booked and arraigned, it looks like they're just going to hold him there to make a point and show off how tough they are - I hope he has legal counsel and pursues this matter through the courts.
Perhaps you could reach him through the blog?

I would imagine that he set this up very, very carefully and had received legal counsel prior to showing up at the airport.
doober is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:43 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ewr,swf,fll
Posts: 835
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
Arrested? Bizarre. I hope that TSO and cop have deep pockets.
not necessarily. although 100% right, he may still have been a disturbance. might be very hard to prove that he wasnt. being arrested for not showing id is one thing but im sure the police will cover their bases by claiming he was disturbing the peace...
4444 is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:48 am
  #9  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Depending on how this moves forward is there any means to coordinate a defense fund for Phil?
Count me in for a contribution.
Spiff is online now  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 7:58 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
Blogger Bob, any comments?
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 8:02 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,199
Originally Posted by doober
....I would imagine that he set this up very, very carefully and had received legal counsel prior to showing up at the airport.
Hmmm very interesting. So perhaps this was a setup - and the intention will be to take the ABQ cops and TSA to court for a 'show' trial. In this case, I'm going to fasten my seatbelt and get ready to enjoy the ride.

Kudos to Phil for his willingness to push the envelope even at personal risk.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 8:15 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by 4444
not necessarily. although 100% right, he may still have been a disturbance. might be very hard to prove that he wasnt. being arrested for not showing id is one thing but im sure the police will cover their bases by claiming he was disturbing the peace...
Who's peace was he disturbing? He can't disturb the TSO's peace and he can't disturb the cop's peace.

If his video shows that he was not acting out of hand then they have nothing.

What concerns me is his partner that by the account I read was not doing ANYTHING, was seized by the police, and removed from public property for knowing Phil.

Sounds to me like a 1st & 4th Amendment violation.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 8:16 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Hmmm very interesting. So perhaps this was a setup - and the intention will be to take the ABQ cops and TSA to court for a 'show' trial. In this case, I'm going to fasten my seatbelt and get ready to enjoy the ride.

Kudos to Phil for his willingness to push the envelope even at personal risk.
I prefer the term "test case".
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 8:24 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
I really just do not understand this argument. I love the freedom that we have in the US to not show ID doing 90% of what we do. I love the fact that I have driven across the US at least 8 times and you never have to show ID at any point. You just have freedom to roam in this country. I love it. On the other hand, it seems perfectly reasonable to me that in order to board an airplane, the airline or the TSA would want to verify that you are the person that the boarding pass says that you are. I have heard all of the arguments against this and they all sound like a 10 yo arguing about why something isn't 'fair'. Now, if you can demonstrate to me that we can go back to the days of no ID to board an airplane, then let's hear it, but I see no way this can be seen as even inconvenient.

By the way, I cannot watch the video on my current machine so I have not actually seen waht happened, just what is related on this thread.

Last edited by Paolo01; Nov 16, 2009 at 8:33 am
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 8:27 am
  #15  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by Paolo01
On the other hand, it seems perfectly reasonable to me that in order to board an airplane, the airline or the TSA would want to verify that you are the person that the boarding pass says that you are. I have heard all of the arguments against this and they all sound like a 10 yo arguing about why something isn't 'fair'. Now, if you can demonstrate to me that we can go back to the days of no ID to board an airplane, then let's hear it, but I see no way this can be seen as even inconvenient.
The airlines, yes. For revenue protection.

The TSA, absolutely not. They have no valid reason to check ID.
Spiff is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.