![]() |
The airlines create these lines. There are elite lines for people who have status as well. That really has nothing to do with how much they paid for their ticket. Some credit card holders get status as well. Airlines are in a tough business. They need all of the revenue they need. Most of them lose money. Some people are willing to pay more than you to go through security. Others are willing to buy large, fast, well equipped jets to fly them directly wherever they want.
These are private businesses. They don't do fair. They try to make money for their shareholders. As I noted, life isn't fair. Get over it. Should it bother you that much you can write a letter to Southworst complaining about it and they can either stop collecting the large sums they are getting for this or appease you. Almost everywhere you go people get preferential treatment. Do you really think that you're going to have the same treatment in a restaurant that Bill Gates would? |
Sure, it's fair for a corporation to give you preferential treatment. As I mentioned, I use my Gold status all the time to skip ahead of people and board the plane first. I love it. The interaction there is between 2 parties: the airline and the passenger who paid the airline for the seat. So of course it's okay for the company to give you preferential treatment because no other party is involved.
But at security, the government (TSA) is involved and being managed by people whose salaries are paid by taxpayers. The government should be giving equal treatment to everyone. Or preferential treatment to its citizens -- not preferential treatment to people who have special relationships with certain corporations. On a state level, would it be acceptable for the DMV to have a special line for people who drove Bentleys -- where those people could skip ahead of you because Bentley paid for those lines? Personally, that would really tick me off |
Originally Posted by mtnsp
(Post 12827571)
On a state level, would it be acceptable for the DMV to have a special line for people who drove Bentleys -- where those people could skip ahead of you because Bentley paid for those lines? Personally, that would really tick me off
The last time I went to my DMV (which was years ago ... thank goodness for online renewals), there was a special line for auto dealers, who could jump to the front of the line in order to perform their transactions, no matter how many ordinary citizens were already in line. |
Originally Posted by mtnsp
(Post 12827571)
Sure, it's fair for a corporation to give you preferential treatment. As I mentioned, I use my Gold status all the time to skip ahead of people and board the plane first. I love it. The interaction there is between 2 parties: the airline and the passenger who paid the airline for the seat. So of course it's okay for the company to give you preferential treatment because no other party is involved.
But at security, the government (TSA) is involved and being managed by people whose salaries are paid by taxpayers. The government should be giving equal treatment to everyone. Or preferential treatment to its citizens -- not preferential treatment to people who have special relationships with certain corporations. On a state level, would it be acceptable for the DMV to have a special line for people who drove Bentleys -- where those people could skip ahead of you because Bentley paid for those lines? Personally, that would really tick me off For instance, at LGA, there is an elite lane manned by airport (airline?) personnel. The elite and regular lines both go to the same TSA podium manned by 1 TSO. When there are people in both lines, the TSO alternates checking ID's between lines (based on roughly 20 trips through LGA security this year). Preferential treatment would be checking ID's of everyone in the elite line first, and then going back to the regular line. That has NEVER been my experience. |
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
(Post 12827604)
Except that you're not that far off.
The last time I went to my DMV (which was years ago ... thank goodness for online renewals), there was a special line for auto dealers, who could jump to the front of the line in order to perform their transactions, no matter how many ordinary citizens were already in line. |
Sure. Completely makes sense for DMV to take dealers first or anyone else who has a large number of plates all at once. Again, the parties are just the government and individuals. DMV would take a large number because it's better workload management. However, It wouldn't make sense if they took *Bentley* dealers because that would be favoring people who had a special relationship with third party private companies.
The analogy in flying would be the way some airports do it -- 2 lines: one for "Expert" travelers and another for "Non-expert". This makes their job easier. I'm all for that. gobluetwo, your explanation makes the most sense -- although I think at many airports I've seen TSA enforcing the line differences Ok, I think we've beat this issue to death. Thanks for the feedback |
All security lanes should be utilized equally. However, it should be up to the airlines' discretion on how to deliver the passengers to the security lanes, or the TSA ID checkers. I have to disagree about TSA people regulating the delivery though. It should be an airport contractor or airline personnel. TSA should focus just on the security process.
|
Originally Posted by mtnsp
(Post 12828488)
The analogy in flying would be the way some airports do it -- 2 lines: one for "Expert" travelers and another for "Non-expert". This makes their job easier. I'm all for that.
Originally Posted by mtnsp
(Post 12828488)
gobluetwo, your explanation makes the most sense -- although I think at many airports I've seen TSA enforcing the line differences.
|
Originally Posted by elitetraveler
(Post 12784584)
The F/J and Frequent Customers of various airlines are what subsidize airlines' ability to offer cheap fares to the masses.
Airlines are a business and do not operate out of goodness of their heart to provide transportation for the masses by offering discounted Y. F and J flying folks most likely have perpetuated this myth out of a sense of superiority complex and nothing else. If airlines are footing the excess bill for fly by security lanes - I see no problem. If however, the taxpayer is subsidizing this option - it would be a big issue IMHO. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:44 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.