SAA Faces Fine Over Incentives to Agents
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
SAA Faces Fine Over Incentives to Agents
"SOUTH African Airways (SAA) is now in double trouble with the competition authorities after the Competition Commission yesterday referred a second case of anticompetitive behaviour to the Competition Tribunal for a ruling, with a recommendation for SAA to be fined up to R1,6bn."
Source : allAfrica.com
johan
Source : allAfrica.com
johan
#2
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: FRA
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 732
...always makes me wonder if things would be better for SAA if they were fully privatized and not part of the Transnet behemoth??? Anything has got to be better than grinding the wheel with the South African government.
This is not to say that the thing with the TAs is good/bad - I just think SAA would do a lot better for itself as a private company.
Still love to fly the new SA C though ^
This is not to say that the thing with the TAs is good/bad - I just think SAA would do a lot better for itself as a private company.
Still love to fly the new SA C though ^
Last edited by FS_FRA; Oct 19, 2004 at 3:50 am Reason: spelling
#3
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tremelo, Belgium
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by floris_FRA
...always makes me wonder if things would be better for SAA if they were fully privatized and not part of the Transnet behemoth??? Anything has got to be better than grinding the wheel with the South African government.
This is not to say that the thing with the TAs is good/bad - I just think SAA would do a lot better for itself as a private company.
Still love to fly the new SA C though ^
This is not to say that the thing with the TAs is good/bad - I just think SAA would do a lot better for itself as a private company.
Still love to fly the new SA C though ^
Thx,
John
#4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Programs: DL Gold, SPG Plat, HHonors Gold, Hertz Gold Pres Circle, AMEX Plat
Posts: 127
Any idea if the South African govt (or Transnet, or S.A.A.) has waived sovereign immunity? Based on the fact that S.A.A. has been hit by this twice, I think, at least S.A.A. has.
I have seen a general so-called government bureaucrat attitude from some S.A.A. phone / gate agents, FAs, etc. But, I think its based on other factors than the fact that S.A.A. is, at least partially, part of the government.
I have seen a general so-called government bureaucrat attitude from some S.A.A. phone / gate agents, FAs, etc. But, I think its based on other factors than the fact that S.A.A. is, at least partially, part of the government.