Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Other European Airlines
Reload this Page >

Ukraine Int’l 737-800 (PS752 IKA-KBP) crashes on takeoff from Tehran, 8 January 2020

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jan 9, 2020, 3:09 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
WELCOME, MODERATOR GUIDELINES and SUMMARY
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk! Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that covers the most up-to-date traveler information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel (not politics or arguments about politics or religion, etc.)

All travelers are welcome in the community. Just choose a forum: conversing about airlines and their programs, airports, destinations, dining and how to make the most of your miles and points, or visit our Information Desk to start.

We do have some Rules, and everyone agrees to abide by these when they are granted free membership privileges. On a topic that generates a lot of feelings and perspectives, please remember "welcoming, respectful" are key words on FlyerTalk.

Please observe the following in this thread:

1. The normal FT Rules apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions on-thread). And please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.

2. You are expected to respect our diversity, and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, orientation, etc." Do not cite, copy, or report on such.

3. Please do continue to be attentive to the sensibilities of the families of those on the flight. Think about if you were them what you would and would not want to see posted. Speculation about what happened is permissible; please, though, do not indulge in inflammatory or overly-lurid descriptions or depictions (or links to same) that could well be hurtful.

4. Overly / extravagantly exaggerative posts such as conspiracy theories, posts beyond the realm of science and known facts, etc. as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously may be summarily deleted. Moderator actions may not be discussed in posts on FlyerTalk.

5. In addition, those who repeatedly fail to comply with FlyerTalk Rules or the guidelines for this thread, may be subjected to FlyerTalk disciplinary actions and have membership privileges suspended, forum masks, etc.


On behalf of the FlyerTalk Moderator Team


N.B. PLEASE do not alter the contents of this moderator note.


OTHER FORA OF INTEREST:

This thread is about the loss of PS752. In depth discussion of unrelated topics — geopolitics, passport theft, aviation security, airport security procedures, etc. — belongs in other fora. A few include:

OMNI/PR: Discussion of perspectives on politics and religion, including geopolitics and terrorism (requires 180 days on FT and 180 constructive posts prior to admission)

If you wish to discuss the politics and political implications related to this issue (or others), please do so in OMNI/PR; the https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni...r-takeoff.html thread is the place.

Travel Safety/Security: Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (including routing passenger aircraft over conflict areas).

Travel Safety/Security: Practical Travel Safety Issues for those discussing travel safety and security issues because they are planning a trip soon (including passport and nationality issues).

TravelBuzz: TravelBuzz for those wishing to discuss the relative safety of a specific aircraft - e.g. Boeing 737.

Further posts regarding any of these issues are liable to summary deletion.

We have a number of Destination fora to discuss various aspects of destination travel (including airports, airport connections, etc.) and Airline, Hotel, etc. fora. You can see them displayed in the Forum Home, here.

Thank you.
Print Wikipost

Ukraine Int’l 737-800 (PS752 IKA-KBP) crashes on takeoff from Tehran, 8 January 2020

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2020, 4:55 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 237
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Iranian cover-up time is over:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/09/v...e-missile.html

Video verified.
OMG, who took the video? A person who lives near the airport? Is this person going to get into trouble?
A318neo is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 6:15 pm
  #92  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
About that NYT-reviewed/linked video, is that an outdoor grill at the last second of It (down toward the right-hand corner) or is that some kind of liquid/gas-holding tank unrelated to grilling food? That could provide quite the clue about who took the video and why the filming was going on that captured this. There is enough in the video that the Iranians should be able to figure out where and when it was filmed and then go from there to try to identify the recording party.

It all sort of looks like it was filmed by someone at a guard post there who has a nearby (lighted) rest/sleeping quarters with some basic utilities but who may have no inside cooking arrangement in the guard post structure. Reminds me of how various Asian governments and other resourceful parties in those areas even quarter guards.

Originally Posted by QtownDave
If it was a SAM as it seems then no such testing would be required as shrapnel holes would tell the story.
x trails leading to a specific investigative conclusion are better than just x-1 trails leading to a specific investigative conclusion. Investigative efforts that may appear in parts to be redundant in arriving at a conclusion can still be useful.

Last edited by GUWonder; Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 6:45 pm
  #93  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,956
Originally Posted by iahphx
It will be interesting to see how the Iranians play this. Obviously, they should simply apologize. Mistakes happen in war. But totalitarian regimes tend to be really, really bad at apologizing.
You mean like the US after downing of IR655?
Palal is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 6:47 pm
  #94  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,956
Video and geolocation of where it was filmed from: https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena...ranian-suburb/

Apparently the cameraman heard the first missile and started filming.
Palal is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 7:00 pm
  #95  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,400
I would think that the person who took the ground photos at the crash scene showing the missile head and the holes in the fuselage could be in more trouble with the government, especially since the decision was made to bulldoze the debris field so quickly. However, it might be harder to find that person, unless someone took a photo or video of the pictures being taken.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 7:52 pm
  #96  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 512
Originally Posted by bzcat
Two were fired. At least one hit the plane.

These seems to be uncontested facts at this point.
1. There were photos of some fuselage and debris at crash site with what appeared to be puncher holes from external projectiles.
2. There was a photo of the head of a missile at the crash site that appeared on Twitter and news media have confirmed the geolocation of that photo.
3. There is now a video of the missile striking the airplane and news media have confirmed the geolocation of that video.
4. Media report says US intelligence agency satellite detected heat signatures of two SAM launches and one impact.

Even absence intelligence report, the evidence is enough for people to draw reasonable conclusions.
sorry. Was referring to video- was expecting to see two missiles based off the comment.
dascc is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 8:10 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,030
Originally Posted by iahphx
It will be interesting to see how the Iranians play this. Obviously, they should simply apologize. Mistakes happen in war. But totalitarian regimes tend to be really, really bad at apologizing.
It would behoove them to apologize given they've been the victim of something similar at the hands of the US in 1988 and the Iranians even made a commemorative stamp out of it.

Though the Americans refused to apologize for it so I doubt the Iranians will apologize for this since they never got an apology for that incident, and pride is just too powerful of a force, sadly.
Nayef is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2020, 8:37 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,678
Originally Posted by Nayef

Though the Americans refused to apologize for it
Nothing formal, but President Reagan personally apologized in a message to Iran

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

The U.S. government issued notes of regret for the loss of human lives, but never formally apologized or acknowledged wrongdoing. Informally, on July 5 of 1988 President Ronald Reagan expressed regret; when directly asked if this statement was intended as an apology to Iran, Reagan replied "Yes."
The US paid out $131.8M in settlements to the Iranians...cold comfort for the lost lives, of course.

Back to this incident, one wonders why Iran didn't keep the airport closed for some time after their missiles attack on the bases in Iraq. This occurred just a few hours afterwards. In addition to the heightened alert posture of its own forces, Iran likely wouldn't yet have known for sure if any reaction from the US would be forthcoming, for example.
84fiero is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 1:41 am
  #99  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 6,900
Originally Posted by dascc
two missiles?
Old Soviet SAM batteries fire two missiles - second after small delay to ensure highest hit probability.
invisible is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 3:11 am
  #100  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,611
Originally Posted by GUWonder
About that NYT-reviewed/linked video, is that an outdoor grill at the last second of It (down toward the right-hand corner) or is that some kind of liquid/gas-holding tank unrelated to grilling food? That could provide quite the clue about who took the video and why the filming was going on that captured this.
The pprune thread has a post that shows the exact location where it was filmed from, and highlights the buildings in a daytime photo.

Somebody has also done a very thorough analysis of the co-ordinates and how long after the 'flash' the explosion can be heard. This puts the person about 3.5km away, which fits perfectly with where the plane was according to FR24.

I'd say this is authentic.
GUWonder and wrp96 like this.
DYKWIA is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 5:04 am
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,154
Originally Posted by Nayef
It would behoove them to apologize given they've been the victim of something similar at the hands of the US in 1988 and the Iranians even made a commemorative stamp out of it.

Though the Americans refused to apologize for it so I doubt the Iranians will apologize for this since they never got an apology for that incident, and pride is just too powerful of a force, sadly.
The Americans did maybe not apologise, but they did not try to keep the incident under wraps, and deny that the plane was shot down by the US.
mnhusker likes this.
CPH-Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 5:44 am
  #102  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by CPH-Flyer
The Americans did maybe not apologise, but they did not try to keep the incident under wraps, and deny that the plane was shot down by the US.
Initially the US Admin at the time claimed the Iranian plane was coming in for an attack and even had some saying it was heading down toward the ship. That ended up not being true.
nancypants likes this.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 5:52 am
  #103  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Programs: American Life Time 2 Million Mile Platinum
Posts: 368
Originally Posted by Palal
You mean like the US after downing of IR655?
Yes.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-054168d98c79/
mnhusker is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 5:53 am
  #104  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,154
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Initially the US Admin at the time claimed the Iranian plane was coming in for an attack and even had some saying it was heading down toward the ship. That ended up not being true.
They clained that they saw an F14, and that the pattern of approach was equal to an attack. Though the did not dispute that missiles had been launched and hit an aircraft in the location that flight 655 went down.
CPH-Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2020, 5:57 am
  #105  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Programs: American Life Time 2 Million Mile Platinum
Posts: 368
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Initially the US Admin at the time claimed the Iranian plane was coming in for an attack and even had some saying it was heading down toward the ship. That ended up not being true.
From Wikipedia with sources:

Contrary to the accounts of various Vincennes crew members, the cruiser's Aegis Combat System recorded that the airliner was climbing at the time and its radio transmitter was squawking on only the Mode III civilian frequency, and not on the military Mode II.[24]

Flight 655 was first detected by the Vincennes immediately after takeoff when it received a short IFF Mode II, possible leading the crew of the Vincennes to believe that the airliner was an Iranian F-14 Tomcat (capable of carrying unguided bombs since 1985[25]) diving into an attack profile. Since the USS Stark incident, all aircraft in the area had to maintain radio contact on - the International Air Defence (IAD) radio frequency. A total of 10 attempts were made to warn the airliner, seven on the Military Air distress (MAD) frequency, and three on the IAD frequency. There were no responses.[14]

At 10:24:22, after receiving no response to multiple radio challenges, Vincennes fired two SM-2MR surface-to-air missiles, one of which hit the airliner at 10:24:43.[26] The plane disintegrated immediately and crashed into the water soon after. None of the 290 passengers and crew on board survived.[26] The cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were never found.[27]

This is what happened.
QtownDave likes this.
mnhusker is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.