![]() |
Personally, I would like to see the reputation feature come back.
How about bringing that back and disabling it in OMNI? Of course, we'd still have the childish members who ding others for childish reasons :rolleyes: But real, honest member feedback is more helpful than number of posts. |
Originally Posted by skofarrell
Again, I think what you post is much more important that how many times you've posted.
|
Thanks for the welcome RobotDoctor.
I agree that low posters can participate in a positive way. There used to be some very high posters that were only here to stir things up. I am glad they have worked to ban those people. |
Originally Posted by Amanda
Thanks for the welcome RobotDoctor.
I agree that low posters can participate in a positive way. There used to be some very high posters that were only here to stir things up. I am glad they have worked to ban those people. |
Originally Posted by Doppy
Personally, I would like to see the reputation feature come back.
How about bringing that back and disabling it in OMNI? Of course, we'd still have the childish members who ding others for childish reasons :rolleyes: But real, honest member feedback is more helpful than number of posts. |
Originally Posted by skofarrell
With all due respect to the OP, focus on post counts is puzzling to me.
. . . . So again, what's to gain by tinkering with a number? |
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
Perhaps you should send a PM to those of your fellow moderators who have done so. I would imagine the motivation is somewhat different for each person who does it.
|
When I had few posts I used to think posts were important. Now I have fairly many posts (I'm somewhere between few and many, with a few more than fairly few :) ), I realise its not a terribly important thing. Now I've spent a lot of time on FT, I've also come to realise that quantity doesn't equal quality. :) Unfortunately, this is a learning curve I would guess most new FTers also have to go through...
|
This is a slippery slope.
What about posts in Newstand, Travel Safety and Security, Off-Topic SPAM offers, Community? They have nothing to do with Points & Miles. Post count is a feature in just about every IBB out there. There is no reason to differentiate one post over another. |
How about only counting useful posts related specifically to miles and points?
No questions/complaints about airline customer service or upgrades or food, etc. And I think that at least five other members must agree that the post is useful and on-topic. Then you should get credit. To ensure we're on equal footing, all post counts should be reset to zero. FT members should be randomly assigned to five member teams and the entire FT archive will be split up among those teams to read, rate and credit posts. |
Just trying to increase my post count.. ;)
|
Originally Posted by couscous
Just trying to increase my post count.. ;)
|
I never really did care much about milepost counts, one way or the other.
However, because I am the one who launched the Who Will Be The Next FlyerTalk Member To Post? An OMNI Game thread, I am in favor of the exclusion of increasing one’s milepost count in OMNI because it eliminates the argument once and for all that that thread is used only to pad one’s milepost count. I have not had a chance to post the latest standings in that thread (let alone answer my private messages and read all of the FlyerTalk threads that I would like to read) just yet, but I have noticed that posting to that thread by FlyerTalk members does not seem to have decreased in the least, which proves that those who post in that thread are not posting there to increase their post count. Furthermore, even when no prizes were offered in the game (as prizes are currently offered at the end of every quarter to those who score the most points), the thread was still quite popular. I like to think that FlyerTalk members post to the Who Will Be The Next FlyerTalk Member To Post? An OMNI Game thread simply because they enjoy it. Everyone else is welcome to post to that thread where virtually everything — including miles, points and travel — is discussed. Beyond this, milepost counts on FlyerTalk really do not matter much to me. However, milepost counts may matter to vampires who fly frequently... |
my personal egoistic reason why I post intensively is, that I want to make sure to maintain my OMNI posting priviliges, even when the 'right to post there' one day may be raised to > 20'000 overall posts :p
|
Originally Posted by Rudi
my personal egoistic reason why I post intensively is, that I want to make sure to maintain my OMNI posting priviliges, even when the 'right to post there' one day may be raised to > 20'000 overall posts :p
|
Originally Posted by Doppy
How about only counting useful posts related specifically to miles and points?
No questions/complaints about airline customer service or upgrades or food, etc. And I think that at least five other members must agree that the post is useful and on-topic. Then you should get credit. To ensure we're on equal footing, all post counts should be reset to zero. FT members should be randomly assigned to five member teams and the entire FT archive will be split up among those teams to read, rate and credit posts. Who the heck has the time to do that? I originally came to FT for advice and information, which I still do. There are times when I do not have the time to post for days, even weeks. I initially assumed that a huge post count meant that the poster was probably very informed and very travel wise. I have since realised that they probably have a lot of spare time. :D |
Originally Posted by jimc_usa
I initially assumed that a huge post count meant that the poster was probably very informed and very travel wise.
I have since realised that they probably have a lot of spare time. :D |
Originally Posted by jimc_usa
Who the heck has the time to do that? I originally came to FT for advice and information, which I still do. There are times when I do not have the time to post for days, even weeks.
I initially assumed that a huge post count meant that the poster was probably very informed and very travel wise. I have since realised that they probably have a lot of spare time. :D |
Originally Posted by Vaze
How right you are ^ if there was a way to remove all Omni posts, past & present, from the overall posting number I'd be all in favor of it :D
|
Originally Posted by Doppy
How about only counting useful posts related specifically to miles and points?
No questions/complaints about airline customer service or upgrades or food, etc. And I think that at least five other members must agree that the post is useful and on-topic. Then you should get credit. To ensure we're on equal footing, all post counts should be reset to zero. FT members should be randomly assigned to five member teams and the entire FT archive will be split up among those teams to read, rate and credit posts. |
Originally Posted by jimc_usa
Who the heck has the time to do that? I originally came to FT for advice and information, which I still do. There are times when I do not have the time to post for days, even weeks.
I initially assumed that a huge post count meant that the poster was probably very informed and very travel wise. I have since realised that they probably have a lot of spare time. :D This is true. Some of the people that want to remove all the Omni post counts appear to me to have this vanity about post count totals. I say that all posts should count, as all forums are part of FT. I could care less about post count totals because I read posts indiscriminately and care little of post count totals. I do post in Omni and have generated a lot of post count totals there. I know others generate post count there as well. However, some seem to complain a lot on ORP about issues that have nothing to do with travel. Speaking of ORP, this forum has nothing to do with travel so why do post add to our post count totals when we post here. In agreeing with CameraGuy, if Omni was stripped from adding to our post count, then I say that Spam, Coupon Connection, Phone programs, Discontinued Programs, Newsstand, Itineraries (as this just reports of a person’s travel frequency), TalkBoard Topics, ORP and the Support & Services forums. Then we can get to the real travel related posts. In agreeing with Doppy: Oh wait, sometimes a post in a travel related site contains a :) , ^ , :td: , or some other smiley and nothing else. Remove all posts that offer nothing related to travel and is merely a post padding post or rant or whatever. As we can see, this scenario muddies the waters and makes managing FT more difficult and more problematic. A slippery slope has been cast and I feel that the only way to remove the slippery slope is to count ALL posts on FlyerTalk, regardless what forum the post was made from. The other alternative is to remove all references to post count. I would be in favor of that then true reputation will determine whether a person is travel credible or not. In time, people will make their own decision as to whose opinion is to be valued or not. I have done this and my basis has nothing to do with post count. |
How about pay per post?
|
I would be broke. ;)
|
[sinister voice]"A penny for your thoughts; a penny for your thoughts."[/sinister voice]
|
So without OMNI, will we see a rash of endless debate on insignificant topics in the "post-counting" boards.
|
...or instead of editing we will add another post. But I forgot what I was going to say. :p
|
Originally Posted by myefre
How about pay per post?
I'm not sure if you realize how funny this statement is. :D I got a good chuckle out of it. Thanks. |
Question for the moderators- has the posts per day count in Omni decreased since you made this change?
Inquiring minds want to know! |
Originally Posted by Athena53
Question for the moderators - has the posts per day count in Omni decreased since you made this change? Inquiring minds want to know! |
Originally Posted by ozstamps
Excellent question.
As the summer holidays are coming to an end more posters are back, and we are actually seeing MORE posts than from when the change was implemented. Threads that could be considered "post padders" are still seemingly just as active as before. |
Originally Posted by ScottC
Threads that could be considered "post padders" are still seemingly just as active as before.
|
Originally Posted by RobotDoctor
some of us are really bored. :p
Wait! :eek: I do resemble that remark :mad: :D |
Originally Posted by ScottC
We really haven't seen a single change, except for UP.
As the summer holidays are coming to an end more posters are back, and we are actually seeing MORE posts than from when the change was implemented. Threads that could be considered "post padders" are still seemingly just as active as before. That is FASCINATING! |
Originally Posted by RobotDoctor
Therefore, one can conclude that post count meant little to some of us, so called, post padders. The conclusion that can be made is that some of us are really bored. :p
Post counts have been the dicsussion topic for some members for as long as I can remember... |
Originally Posted by ScottC
Post counts have been the dicsussion topic for some members for as long as I can remember...
|
Originally Posted by ScottC
We really haven't seen a single change, except for UP...
2. There is just so much one can ad to the recuring, Bush Lied threads. :D |
Originally Posted by jimc_usa
Who the heck has the time to do that?
|
Originally Posted by Doppy
Exactly my point. Taking away the post-count earning of OMNI was fine. But I don't really see the benefit of turning this post-count business into a life's work, as some seem to be advocating. I think it's a waste of time.
|
Originally Posted by ScottC
Expecially since it would only please a couple of members.
Amazing the power of a newbie :rolleyes: |
A wise FlyerTalk member once gave these words of sage advice:
One should be concerned with having each post count rather than be concerned about one’s post count. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.