FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   xONEx fare rule changes (in conjunction with the 10% sale) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/916448-xonex-fare-rule-changes-conjunction-10-sale.html)

BDA shorts Jan 30, 2009 5:48 pm

xONEx fare rule changes (in conjunction with the 10% sale)
 
New xONEx fares were loaded into the GDSes today (or very recently). Along with the new sale prices, I'm seeing some changes in the fare rules. Here's the biggie:

Code:

          WHEN TRAVEL ORIGINATES IN A COUNTRY FOR WHICH A     
          SPECIFIC LOCAL CURRENCY FARE IS PUBLISHED AND       
          THE TICKET IS SOLD IN ANOTHER COUNTRY THE FARE       
          WILL BE THAT PUBLISHED FOR THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN     
          CONVERTED TO THE CURRENCY OF THE COUNTRY OF SALE     
          AT THE BANK SELLING RATE. THE RESULTANT FARE         
          MUST NOT BE LOWER THAN THAT FROM THE COUNTRY OF     
          SALE.                                               
            EXCEPTION - NOT APPLICABLE FOR SALES MADE AND/     
              OR TRAVEL ORIGINATING IN CANADA OR WHEN BOTH   
              TRAVEL ORIGINATES AND SALES ARE MADE WITHIN
    ‡
              THE EUROPEAN COMMON AVIATION AREAS /ECAA/.      ‡

The ECAA exception used to be an "or," not an "and." So, for instance, I just purchased an ex-LON ticket in BDA and qualified for the exception; under the new rules, I would have to purchase the ticket in LON as well as originate from there.

Edited to add: Looks like the PDFed rule sheet on oneworld still shows the old rules.

christep Jan 30, 2009 7:24 pm

True - although you could also purchase it in Canada for that price still.

That was a nice little drafting error (I assume) whilst it lasted.

serfty Jan 30, 2009 7:30 pm

I guess one could still purchase a fare ex LHR at FRA and pay the UK price ...

There was mention elswhere of a change in the wording of the 2nd permitted Asian "transit without stopover" clause. Is this the case?

BDA shorts Jan 30, 2009 8:08 pm


Originally Posted by serfty (Post 11174089)
I guess one could still purchase a fare ex LHR at FRA and pay the UK price ...

There was mention elswhere of a change in the wording of the 2nd permitted Asian "transit without stopover" clause. Is this the case?

QF travel agency news mentioned a change to that language as well but it doesn't look any different:

Only one intercontinental departure and one intercontinental arrival permitted in each continent except as follows: ... 2. Two permitted in Asia when one is a transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe.

Dr. HFH Jan 31, 2009 6:16 am


Originally Posted by christep (Post 11174075)
That was a nice little drafting error (I assume) whilst it lasted.

I agree. It seemed pretty generous at the time, and this makes much more sense.

Keith009 Jan 31, 2009 10:59 am

Ugh... will just have to jump through a few more hoops to get ticketed now... (that's assuming AA ICN still doesn't accept CC over the phone).

thetravelguy Jan 31, 2009 2:12 pm

Here is your answer

Just find a country where the RTW fare is less than the country where you want to originate and you should be golden to pay the local fare based on the country where you are originating

As an example, if you want a ticket to start in Bangkok that ticket could now be issued in London as the U.K. fare is now less than the Thailand fare

A Euro originated ticket could be purchased in the U.K as the U.K. fare is less than the Euro fare but not the other way around

And based on comments here I did a search on fares from Seoul and they just seem silly..A three continents for approx US$3,700 + taxes? after the 10% discount is applied


I know Madoff gets all the blame, and if they are willing to sell at this fare then why not but is this nothing more than a Ponzi in another form? Cutting the pricing on expensive ticket to get cash in on services that will likely be provided later, and using the cash to pay more current obligations?

Sounds like a Ponzi to me...only becomes a problem when the money runs out

BDA shorts Jan 31, 2009 2:24 pm


Originally Posted by thetravelguy (Post 11177357)
Here is your answer

Just find a country where the RTW fare is less than the country where you want to originate and you should be golden to pay the local fare based on the country where you are originating

As an example, if you want a ticket to start in Bangkok that ticket could now be issued in London as the U.K. fare is now less than the Thailand fare

A Euro originated ticket could be purchased in the U.K as the U.K. fare is less than the Euro fare but not the other way around

Sorry, doesn't work that way... fare is based on country of origin unless equivalent fare in country of sale is higher. So in your examples you'd end up paying the BKK rate converted to pounds and the EU rate converted to pounds.

thetravelguy Jan 31, 2009 2:45 pm

BDA Shorts

I did not say the BKK fare would be at the lower U.K. fare, but merely that it could be issued in the U.K. . You are correct that the Baht price would be converted to pounds based on the weekly IATA rate in effect but the base fare whether purchased in Bangkok or London would be about the same

However, as you are in BDA if you were to purchase a BKK origin in the Bermuda you would pay the higher U.S. fare level

BDA shorts Jan 31, 2009 2:55 pm

Fair enough... I misinterpreted which "local" fare you were talking about! What you say works but has limited use--if ex-LON is cheaper than ex-BKK and I lived in LON, I'd end up buying an ex-LON ticket instead of a positioning flight + higher ex-BKK fare.

I'm sure however that there are situations where you'd want to do it that way.

thetravelguy Jan 31, 2009 3:23 pm

These are crazy times we live in, and I never remember the London fare being lower than the fare from several Asian countries (Korea excluded of course). My reasoning is that for servicing it is easier to deal with an agent in London and pay in GBP rather than Thai Baht

Keith009 Feb 1, 2009 3:37 am


Originally Posted by thetravelguy (Post 11177357)
Here is your answer

Just find a country where the RTW fare is less than the country where you want to originate and you should be golden to pay the local fare based on the country where you are originating

All v well and good, except that I can't think of a DONE4 anywhere that's cheaper than a ex-ICN one. Maybe South Africa. We'll see...

Keith009 Feb 1, 2009 3:39 am


Originally Posted by thetravelguy (Post 11177357)
Here is your answer

Just find a country where the RTW fare is less than the country where you want to originate and you should be golden to pay the local fare based on the country where you are originating

Right, ex-South Africa costs about the same as ex-ICN so i might try to issue with mindpearl if AA ICN won't budge on CNP payment. We'll see... Worse comes to worst I'll simply bite the extra fuel fines and issue through another carrier ex-ICN; AA will reissue my itinerary when I need an EVIP applied anyway.

RTW4 Feb 1, 2009 4:21 am

Does CX KOREA also need one to present the CC in person or will they accept a phone CC? Thanks for your help...

nomoreiphone Feb 2, 2009 10:37 am

I am not 100% sure what this rule means??
I thought you can purchase an EX ICN ticket from UK/EU/Canada based on the previous rule change? What has changed?

Also why do you guys want to deal with the AA GSA in ICN? I basically used AA UK to issue the tix and it is billed in GBP. All over the phone.
Also to save some $$$ I used the local AA office to make changes before the queue it to the Tarrif desk in DUB.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.