![]() |
Booking RTW through Sabre
I'm thinking about building my RTW in Sabre (I use a host agency), queuing it over to AA to price out, and then issuing the ticket myself. I want to do this for all the standard reasons people like to book complex itineraries themselves (mainly, to cut out constantly being on hold with a bunch of agents on the phone).
Are there any huge disadvantages to doing this? My worry is that I'll be somewhere in the world with no Sabre access and I'll need to make a change to my itinerary (most likely just a date change, not a reroute). I know DL now charges a fee for making any change to an itinerary booked by travel agents but I haven't found evidence that AA does this as well. By the way, for those of you trying this at home: You don't need to queue the PNR to the regular international rate desk queue. RTW has their own pricing queue--QP/TUL91/11. |
AA will be able to alter an agency booking for you post departure. I've not been charged anything.
And I assume you're booking ex-USA? If you're starting an itinerary from an overseas location you'd still need to get a local ticketing office (or offices in the EU or Canada) to issue the itinerary for you to get the lower price. |
I'm ticketing in the US and flying ex-LGW with the EU exception, so I should be fine in that respect.
Quick check of the rules--"Not applicable for sales made and/or travel originating in Canada or the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA)." So I should be good to go, unless I'm misreading that. Thanks for confirming that an agency booking isn't a problem. |
Originally Posted by BDA shorts
(Post 11001080)
I'm ticketing in the US and flying ex-LGW with the EU exception, so I should be fine in that respect.
Quick check of the rules--"Not applicable for sales made and/or travel originating in Canada or the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA)." So I should be good to go, unless I'm misreading that. Thanks for confirming that an agency booking isn't a problem. You cannot ticket in USA as it is considered a 'sale' and you're originating in the EU. If you're based in Canada, then that's fine. Basically if you even have to ASK the question whether you can book through Sabre means that you are not qualified to even attempt this sort of transaction. Using a host agency does not qualify you as a travel agent. Especially amateur ones pretending to be professionals. |
Originally Posted by BDA shorts
(Post 11000756)
I'm thinking about building my RTW in Sabre (I use a host agency), queuing it over to AA to price out, and then issuing the ticket myself. I want to do this for all the standard reasons people like to book complex itineraries themselves (mainly, to cut out constantly being on hold with a bunch of agents on the phone).
|
Originally Posted by Guy Betsy
(Post 11002536)
Yes you are misreading that.
You cannot ticket in USA as it is considered a 'sale' and you're originating in the EU. If you're based in Canada, then that's fine. Basically if you even have to ASK the question whether you can book through Sabre means that you are not qualified to even attempt this sort of transaction. Using a host agency does not qualify you as a travel agent. Especially amateur ones pretending to be professionals. |
My itinerary came back from the pricing queue--
24.H-UNABLE TO RATE DUE TO NO AA TRANSOCEANIC FLT, NN TO 25.H-REQUEST RATE FROM BA SO THEY CAN COLLECT APPL YQ/YR . 26.H-THX COOPS 0708/03JAN/TK9 I have an AA international flight (BDA-JFK) but none of my over-the-water flights are on AA. Guess I'll need to call them now anyway. |
Strange, AA RTW very happily ticketed my current ex-MNL AONE3 with only 5 domestic segments on AA codes/metal.
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 11003288)
Strange, AA RTW very happily ticketed my current ex-MNL AONE3 with only 5 domestic segments on AA codes/metal.
|
Originally Posted by QF009
(Post 11003468)
BDA Shorts is hooked up to Sabre and has DIYed the booking, rendering it an agency booking. The tariffs desks won't rate agency bookings if they don't contain at least one AA overwater segment. They'd do such bookings only for pax who have dealt directly with AA.
I could add in an AA over-the-water piece but that would turn my LON-BDA direct flight into LON-JFK-BDA, which is much less convenient. If anyone is interested, my itinerary is: BA LGW-BDA AA BDA-JFK AA JFK-RDU AA RDU-DFW QF DFW-HNL (operated by AA) QF HNL-SYD surface sector QF BNE-AKL QF AKL-MEL QF MEL-PER QF PER-NRT CX NRT-HKG CX HKG-DXB RJ DXB-AMM RJ AMM-TLV BA TLV-LHR |
You could switch DFW-HNL-SYD to the AA flight codes and requeue.
Might have been faster to ring up the ATW desk after all that, btw. ;) |
I don't see an AA flight code for HNL-SYD... they do codeshare the QF LAX-SYD and SFO-SYD but I need to be in HNL for at least long enough to get a driver's license (needed for tax purposes).
Might be a good time to ask--I'm booking DFW-HNL on QF/AA codeshare instead of directly on AA to avoid the $100 fuel surcharge. Shouldn't be any problems with that, right? |
AA7358 HNL-SYD.
You'd only be able to book DFW-HNL on QF if there's a transpacific segment on QF flight code IIRC. |
Originally Posted by QF009
(Post 11003542)
AA7358 HNL-SYD.
You'd only be able to book DFW-HNL on QF if there's a transpacific segment on QF flight code IIRC. Right, that QF shows up as "INTL ONLINE CONEX/STPVR TFC ONLY"--since I'm stopping in HNL and then continuing on QF to SYD that should be okay. Or, rather, it would have been okay but for the above change to the AA codeshare. |
And alas, we get to this problem: AA7358 HNL-SYD doesn't have availability in L on 9/25. QF 4, on the other hand, does. I doubt the rate desk will be happy about pricing this out if the AA over-the-water is waitlist.
If I really wanted to I'd imagine I could find another date where AA7358 does have L, book that, price and ticket, then change back to QF4 on the date that I want... at this point, probably easier to pick up the phone! |
Originally Posted by BDA shorts
(Post 11003603)
And alas, we get to this problem: AA7358 HNL-SYD doesn't have availability in L on 9/25. QF 4, on the other hand, does. I doubt the rate desk will be happy about pricing this out if the AA over-the-water is waitlist.
If I really wanted to I'd imagine I could find another date where AA7358 does have L, book that, price and ticket, then change back to QF4 on the date that I want... at this point, probably easier to pick up the phone! |
Originally Posted by number_6
(Post 11004271)
Either of these would work. Or you can open date AA HNL-SYD, which might be the cleanest solution. Once you are ticketed it is often easy to get L inventory released (need approval by yield management but they make a lot on that over-water sector, maybe more than the sold HNL-SYD discounted fares even in L).
Code:
PRICE QUOTE RECORD - DETAILS 1) $175 in fuel surcharges. I think I can live with that--or would they be easy to get rid of? Then there's that $2.93 Q charge... I'm willing to let them have that. :D 2) Base fare is the ex-LON fare that I was expecting. In the remarks they wrote "TICKETING RESTRICTIONS APPLY." I wonder if that means what I think it does (that I'd need to get this ticketed in London). 3) Taxes are a fair bit lower than I was expecting. Going through the tax breakdown, Australia's definitely the worst offender. Observations are welcome... otherwise I'll call up AA's UK office tomorrow and see if they can ticket for me. |
That PQR is good for ticketing in the US as it has been built for an ex-US purchase ("SQSD‡TQSD").
|
Originally Posted by QF009
(Post 11005673)
That PQR is good for ticketing in the US as it has been built for an ex-US purchase ("SQSD‡TQSD").
This makes me think that either I was right about this itinerary not needing to be ticketed in England, or someone at the rate desk wasn't paying attention. I guess the only way to figure that out is to send the rate desk an itinerary out of somewhere else, like ICN. |
The rates desks are generally quite spot on with these things IME. I'd trust them over a lot of the new staff at the ATW desk.
My reading of the applicable fare rule ("and/or travel originating in") indicates that you can indeed ticket that itinerary in the US at the UK base fare. Just noticed that the EU exemption from "higher of 2" pricing has been v slightly modified to an ECAA exemption now. Definition of ECAA here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea..._Aviation_Area ;nothing much has changed unless anyone was intending to issue the ticket from an EU state that isn't signatory to the ECAA. |
Originally Posted by QF009
(Post 11003468)
The AA tariffs desks won't provide a rate for agency bookings if they don't contain at least one AA overwater segment. They'd do such bookings only for pax who have dealt directly with AA (eg RTW desk).
|
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
(Post 11007998)
AA offices will still happily price and ticket an agency booking which does not contain an AA overwater segment. I have done this many times.
In other news: I re-queued my itinerary specifying ticketing in BDA (both because I could easily walk down to the CTO here for ticketing and because BDA tickets tend to have fewer US taxes on them). Rate came back with a Country of Payment Minimum Check! Price was about $2,000 higher. Odd that COP wouldn't apply for US sale/ticketing but would for a BDA sale/ticketing. |
Update: I put a note to the rate desk in the PNR quoting the fare rules regarding Country of Payment not applying for travel originating in London. They corrected the fare!
Decrease in US taxes wasn't as much as I had hoped for (about $25), but given only three domestic segments I'm not surprised. Will still be worth it to have the ticketing done in BDA. Code:
PQ 1 SBDA‡TBDA |
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
(Post 11007998)
AA offices will still happily price and ticket an agency booking which does not contain an AA overwater segment. I have done this many times.
The one exception to this was a Europe Air Pass which naturally had no AA segments. But it got pass the US rates desk as my flights into and out of Europe (DONE4) were ticketed on AA and had a TATL segment on AA. |
Thank you to everyone for your help and suggestions on this. I took my PNR to the AA office downtown and it was ticketed--of course there were a few hiccups during ticketing but I'm not surprised given the complexity of these things. The nice lady ticketing my itinerary had never seen a RTW before, and I was the talk of her office for the rest of the day.
Here's what I learned from all of this: aside from having to queue your ticket for pricing, RTWs can be just as easily DIY'ed as, say, BDA-BOS-BDA for the weekend. If I didn't want Bermuda ticketing (see above for why I did this) I could've easily ticketed this myself. |
Originally Posted by BDA shorts
(Post 11063045)
If I didn't want Bermuda ticketing (see above for why I did this) I could've easily ticketed this myself.
|
Originally Posted by QF009
(Post 11064292)
Subject to POS restrictions and any applicable exceptions. You wouldn't be able to ticket the PNR yourself at the ex-LON fare in BDA or the US if your itinerary had started outside Canada and Europe for instance.
Although it is that much easier if you're also in a situation where you can ticket it yourself. |
Another ticket now, purchasing now before the rumored fare increases come in. Has a bunch of open segments on AA, QF, BA because planned flights are >330 days into the future. Priced out with the rate desk, converted to a Phase IV, tried to ticket it myself... Sabre can't do it. Two calls to the Sabre helpdesk and apparently it's because of the open segments. Two calls to the AA rates desk and they can't believe that, but nothing they can do.
So I call the regular reservations number and get the international desk (RTW is closed this late at night and I wanted to get this taken care of). Lady takes the credit card... and says she has to get a paper ticket issued! No complaints here... but why? If it helps, itinerary is LHR-BA-CAI-RJ-AMM-RJ-DME//PVG-JL-KIX-JL-HAN//SIN-open-PER-open-AYQ//MEL-open-CNS-open-syd-open-HNL-open-DFW//IAD-open-LHR |
I find it easier to book these segments with sequential dates booked well in advance (but obviously not the date you are actually intending to travel) and change later. Save all that hassle.
e.g. Last year in Feb I booked a LONE4 with travel dates USA/EUR in June and Asia/Oz in Nov/Dec. In July a simple call to AA resulted in the Asian segments being re booked for April and Oz in May. |
Originally Posted by BDA shorts
(Post 11132047)
Sabre can't do it. Two calls to the Sabre helpdesk and apparently it's because of the open segments. Two calls to the AA rates desk and they can't believe that, but nothing they can do.
So I call the regular reservations number and get the international desk (RTW is closed this late at night and I wanted to get this taken care of). Lady takes the credit card... and says she has to get a paper ticket issued! No complaints here... but why? About halfway through my travels, I nailed down specific flights and dates for the remainder, and had it reissued as an e-ticket. It was an interesting, complicated and time-consuming (50 minutes at BOS ticket counter) procedure, but it actually worked just fine. Ticketing supervisor at BOS understood what I was trying to do, but had never done it before and had no idea how to do it. All remaining flight coupons of paper ticket lifted, e-ticket issued, and receipt/itinerary printed.
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 11132099)
I find it easier to book with sequential dates booked and change later. Save all that hassle.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.