![]() |
Originally Posted by chiliyo
(Post 8879015)
KEF is ONLY served by FI and FI Exp. Iceland is the only country in the world that has only ONE airline this is regardless of what the KEF airport website tells you.
No other carrier wants to fly there , therefore FI treats their customers like cattle or worse !!! Numerous times I was stuck at KEF to the point that I quit a project doing because of NO options of getting there/out of there on any other carrier but FI. (And meanwhile, BA certaiinly flies to both ARN and OSL daily, so if they "wanted" they could connect you to KEF.) So while the KEF airport website may have inaccuracies, your post cllaiming no one flies to KEF besides IcelandAir is completely wrong. Perhaps no one else flies there longhaul, but that's not what you said. Perhaps no one who partners with a OneWorld airline flies there, but that's not what you said. (I suspect that if I checked other airlines listed there, I would find more, but I picked SAS because I know of their commitment to "secondary" airports in Sandinavian countries and of their "refusal" to route everyone through only one hub in one country. :) ) |
More Iceland Problems
Well, we thought we were safe on our Iceland segments, since we were traveling by BA in mid-March. Nope. Yesterday we got a notice that BA had canceled our flights.
Turns out they are substituting smaller aircraft without a business class section, and since we have J tickets, they simply canceled our tickets! We weren't even moved to Y. (I would have asked for our money back anyway as I'm not paying for J and flying in Y.) Nice. Fortunately we'd purchased the tickets separately from our AONE4, so it doesn't cause us a huge problem -- we're just skipping Iceland on this trip. But I think BA handled this badly. |
Originally Posted by free101girl
(Post 8975735)
Turns out they are substituting smaller aircraft without a business class section, and since we have J tickets, they simply canceled our tickets! We weren't even moved to Y. (I would have asked for our money back anyway as I'm not paying for J and flying in Y.)
|
Originally Posted by free101girl
(Post 8975735)
Turns out they are substituting smaller aircraft without a business class section, and since we have J tickets, they simply canceled our tickets! We weren't even moved to Y. (I would have asked for our money back anyway as I'm not paying for J and flying in Y.) Nice. Fortunately we'd purchased the tickets separately from our AONE4, so it doesn't cause us a huge problem -- we're just skipping Iceland on this trip. But I think BA handled this badly. By your admission, they gave you exactly what you would have wanted given the cancellation since you wouldn't want to pay a business fare and fly in economy; if you are happy to fly in economy ( and I don't think that economy is much worse than business on the short haul routes given that they are the convertible seats) you can happily rebook at the cheapest appropriate economy fare Dave |
Originally Posted by og
(Post 8975777)
Looks like a 752 in an all WHY configuration is operating LGW-KEF (at least for the 2 days that I checked in February). Surely BA could just book you onto that aircraft if you tell them that you were originally confirmed in J? Since it has many more seats than the 734 that normally is seen, there shouldn't be a problem getting on. I wouldn't abandon a trip to Iceland just for this reason.
We'll have to visit Iceland on another trip. |
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 8975838)
Im confused; how did BA handle it badly?
The e-mail ended up in my spam folder and I could easily have missed it. Further, if I had been an inexperienced flyer who really needed to make that flight, I would have been panicked, because I would have thought the flight was no longer available, when in fact it was only J that was unavailable. Oh well, all's well that ends well. |
Originally Posted by free101girl
(Post 8975869)
They handled it badly in that they simply canceled our tickets and sent us an e-mailed notice stating that our FLIGHT had been canceled, with no further information and no alternatives offered. Why didn't they call us and explain our options?
Originally Posted by free101girl
(Post 8975869)
The e-mail ended up in my spam folder and I could easily have missed it.
Dave |
I't seems an email address was provided as a cancellation notice was sent.
The question as to how BA "Handled this Badly" is, as promoted by free101girl, "They handled it badly in that they simply canceled our tickets and sent us an e-mailed notice stating that our FLIGHT had been canceled, with no further information and no alternatives offered.". BA could have handled this situation better by ensuring an email was sent informing of the change and offering options, rather than simply canceling and sending an email to that effect. |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 8977058)
I't seems an email address was provided as a cancellation notice was sent...
|
I understood that as well.
What I was basically referring to was that BA could have made better use of the available e-mail facility. |
Originally Posted by Viajero
(Post 8977110)
I understood Dave's comment as a response to free101girl questioning why BA did not call them to explain their options. It seems that if you opt for email contact that is precisely what you get, no more no less.
|
So
First, the OP AAlot got 5 Plat tix from AA. BA is AA partner via OneWorld. So what? AA isn't responsible for BA schedule changes, delays or route or flight cancellations. DUH. I don't see BA becoming directly involved with what now is essentially business between an AA customer getting AA stock cut tix for partner flights to KEF on route that no longer exist via BA. Since theere are NO other OneWorld partner carriers flying KEF or other Iceland town, I think OP is out of luck unless OP can get AA to pay for the 5 tix on Icelandair, which I seriously doubt they'll do. If they're PAID (cash bought tix) then certainly OP is entitled to a full refund. If AWARD tix then the option would be return of mileage used for "purchase," refund of any taxes/fees paid, and perhaps some other type of non-cash compensation. Airlines have a right to discontinue service on routes if they so choose as necessary with limited notice. Air Canada did the same with direct Heathrow-St. Johns Newfoundland route, forcing Europeans planning summer vacations in Newfoundland to fly into Halifax NS and transfer there, adding $$ and at least 2 hours each direction. If it's a trip into the Arctic you want, why not fly to Winnipeg and head to Churchill. Manitoba and see the polar bears up close and personal... you'll surely see a hell of alot more there than Iceland with towns hundreds of miles apart with NO public transportation... Again, you can "blow smoke from your stack", but I just don't see AA buying 5 tix on a carrier NOT THEIR PARTNER.-- (i could see MAYBE 2). Again OP's beef is with AA Not BA. Up to AA to get them there or Not. Most likely, it's NOT going to happen. I just don't see OP winning "their way" even if they gets a lawyer involved. These kind of changes/cancellations, unexpected and unforeseen events including delays etc is WHY there's a thing called TRIP/TRAVEL INSURANCE. DUH. |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 8977172)
I understood that as well.
What I was basically referring to was that BA could have made better use of the available e-mail facility. Dave |
Originally Posted by illinifan
(Post 8982257)
If they had her phone number, a follow up phone call would have helped. Otherwise, more explanation in the email and options would have been useful.
It's probably a matter of expectations and experience. I have never received an email or a telephone call from AA, not once, and they have my email and telephone number. All I get is a "There has been a change in your itinerary, please contact AA" notice when and if I retrieve the PNR to check on aa.com. If I don't login and check I find out nothing, until check-in. So, thanks to wise advice read in the AA forum years ago I check aa.com very often. Could AA do more? Sure. Do they handle it badly? Not in my book. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:11 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.