![]() |
Great resource hauteboy ^ , thanks.
|
Let me add my voice to the chorus of praise - hurrah for hauteboy, a magnificent effort. Now for me just to get the next RTW going (ohhhhh, too far away! :D ).
|
The validator doesn't like either of these RTW itineraries:
yyz-ord-anc-dfw-lga,jfk-syd-akl-mel-hkg-nrt-hkg-sin-hkg-lhr-dxb-lhr-ist-lhr-yvr-jfk,lga-yyz bos-dfw-anc-dfw-sju-lax-lhr-dxb-lhr-rom-hel-hkg-nrt-hkg-jfk-bos Are they valid? And if so, can they be used to diagnose the difficulty? Also, do you need a way to designate transit-only segments? And if so, perhaps > or = could be used to note a transit-only segment that would otherwise violate a ONE rule. I also recommend allowing remarks or comments in the sequence for the validator to ignore, but the human to be able to see. Perhaps square brackets [could be used to make remarks] in the string to be validated. |
Originally Posted by 925
The validator doesn't like either of these RTW itineraries:
yyz-ord-anc-dfw-lga,jfk-syd-akl-mel-hkg-nrt-hkg-sin-hkg-lhr-dxb-lhr-ist-lhr-yvr-jfk,lga-yyz bos-dfw-anc-dfw-sju-lax-lhr-dxb-lhr-rom-hel-hkg-nrt-hkg-jfk-bos Are they valid? And if so, can they be used to diagnose the difficulty? |
Yeah, that's one of the bugs I need to work on.. Canada/US/PR/VI? and Denmark/Sweden/Norway are considered the same country so it shouldn't trigger the multiple entry/exit rule.
|
Ok.. Version 0.4 released.. fixes the us/ca/pr/vi and dk/se/no 'same country' rule.. so the following are valid itins:
yyz-ord-anc-dfw-lga,jfk-syd-akl-mel-hkg-nrt-hkg-sin-hkg-lhr-dxb-lhr-ist-lhr-yvr-jfk,lga-yyz bos-dfw-anc-dfw-sju-lax-lhr-dxb-lhr-rom-hel-hkg-nrt-hkg-jfk-bos osl-arn-lhr-hel-hkg-jfk-hel-cph Transit rules still aren't checked.. they're a bit trickier ie. I was able to ticket JFK-SCL-(LAX-JFK)-SYD as a valid transit. Would HKG-(FRA-LHR)-ACC-LHR-DXB be considered as transit? How about LHR-(NRT-HKG)-AKL-HKG-KHI? or JFK-HKG-NRT-MEL-AKL-(HKG-SIN)-LHR? I plan on using the ()'s to denote the transit segments if and when I get this working. :) The LAX-JFK might be a special case as it was domestic flight. I am guessing the other examples would NOT be allowed. :( I don't know of any 'transit only' segments that wouldn't violate a rule.. or were you referring to my JFK-SCL-LAX-JFK-SYD example? |
Great Tool.
How about adding totals to the OWE QF status columns. |
This is an excellent tool, hauteboy! ^
I just wanted to point out a bug which refers to this rule - J)WITHIN AUSTRALIA - ONLY O N E NONSTOP/SINGLE PLANE SERVICE IS PERMITTED BETWEEN THE FOLLOWING POINTS: BNE/CNS/SYD-PER; MEL/SYD-DRW. EXCEPTION: NO RESTRICTION BETWEEN SYD-PER FOR PASSENGERS ORIGINATIING IN PER WHEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRAVEL TO/FROM AFRICA. I initially had a SYD-PER and DRW-SYD segments, and the tool accepted it. |
Originally Posted by santana
This is an excellent tool, hauteboy! ^
I just wanted to point out a bug which refers to this rule - J)WITHIN AUSTRALIA - ONLY O N E NONSTOP/SINGLE PLANE SERVICE IS PERMITTED BETWEEN THE FOLLOWING POINTS: BNE/CNS/SYD-PER; MEL/SYD-DRW. EXCEPTION: NO RESTRICTION BETWEEN SYD-PER FOR PASSENGERS ORIGINATIING IN PER WHEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRAVEL TO/FROM AFRICA. I initially had a SYD-PER and DRW-SYD segments, and the tool accepted it. |
Originally Posted by GibSpmuh
You should be able to do both no worries, the semi-colon separates them into two separate restrictions. So as you successfully managed, you can do that (so SYD-DRW-PER-SYD is legitimate for instance). You just can't do SYD-DRW-MEL or SYD-PER-BNE for instance.
A few minor updates, I've been working on adding support to the planner tool to show what fare classes are offered on that route. |
Originally Posted by GibSpmuh
You should be able to do both no worries, the semi-colon separates them into two separate restrictions. So as you successfully managed, you can do that (so SYD-DRW-PER-SYD is legitimate for instance). You just can't do SYD-DRW-MEL or SYD-PER-BNE for instance.
SYD-DRW DRW-ADL ADL-PER PER-SYD Instead of doing PER-MEL and then get an extra ticket for MEL-SYD. Thanks, GibSpmuh! ^ |
So, assuming SYD-BME-SYD-BME-SYD is the longest in Australia, what is the longest in all of SWP? Surely there must be a longer routing. For example, does MNL qualify? Or some other SWP airport?
|
Originally Posted by 925
So, assuming SYD-BME-SYD-BME-SYD is the longest in Australia, what is the longest in all of SWP? Surely there must be a longer routing. For example, does MNL qualify? Or some other SWP airport?
PER-BNE is actually the longest segment in SWP.. but because of the restrictions to PER, SYD-BME-SYD-BME-SYD is probably the longest possible routing. MNL is considered part of Asia. |
There used to be a PER-AKL flight (a BA extension to their 744 service LHR-SIN-PER I think). But that stopped quite a few years back. SWP (from a OneWorld perspective) only covers Australia, New Zullund, PNG and the Pacific Island ports of Noumea, Suva, Nadi, Apia, Port Vila and Papeete. However, some of these Island ports are only accessible via codeshares on a Global Explorer fare and not on a OneWorld Explorer fare.
Anothefr good earner is PER-CNS, but it also falls under the same segment restrictions as PER-SYD and PER-BNE. |
We can still live in hope that there'll be a PER-AKL direct flight one day (like NZ has already) - or in the even remoter hope that QF actually returning some of their own metal across the SWP to the likes of PPT, but for the moment I certainly wouldn't be holding my breath on that ever happening (or if it does it'll almost certainly be under AO instead of QF *sigh*).
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:24 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.