FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Sri Lankan (UL) join date? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/1425891-sri-lankan-ul-join-date.html)

FedUp2 Jan 9, 2013 10:17 am

Sri Lankan (UL) join date?
 
Does anyone know an approximate date when UL is scheduled to join OW?

themapelligroup Jan 9, 2013 11:25 am

It usually takes 12-18 months after the joining announce. UL was announced in June so at least June 2013, but it's more likely to join late 2013 or early 2014. They have to integrate their systems and receive the approval of the sponsor airline (CX in this case). Consider also QR's full integration may have a priority in the plans of oneworld.

moa999 Jan 9, 2013 5:13 pm

For comparison, Malaysian was announced on 6 June 2011...
It is still not a full member - scheduled for 1 Feb 2013 (20 months),
albeit earning rates are yet to be published

Kachjc Jan 9, 2013 9:46 pm

Qatar may enter before Sri Lankan cause they have nearly done everything

themapelligroup Jan 10, 2013 11:41 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 20015106)
Qatar may enter before Sri Lankan cause they have nearly done everything

Do you have sources to say that?
I'm not polemical, just asking for traveling reasons :)

Guy Betsy Jan 14, 2013 2:41 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 20015106)
Qatar may enter before Sri Lankan cause they have nearly done everything

What have they done?

c2h Jan 14, 2013 9:44 am


Originally Posted by moa999 (Post 20013708)
For comparison, Malaysian was announced on 6 June 2011...
It is still not a full member - scheduled for 1 Feb 2013 (20 months),
albeit earning rates are yet to be published

To be fair, it was reported that MH was ready back in Nov 2012 but delayed their entry until the peak holiday season ends thus Feb 1. So 18 months exactly.

Austinrunner Jan 14, 2013 1:37 pm

Who reported that?

headinclouds Jan 14, 2013 2:20 pm


Originally Posted by c2h (Post 20044081)
To be fair, it was reported that MH was ready back in Nov 2012 but delayed their entry until the peak holiday season ends thus Feb 1. So 18 months exactly.

Per the 3rd paragraph of the the oneworld web site:
http://www.oneworld.com/news-informa...objectID=52929

moa999 Jan 14, 2013 3:45 pm


Originally Posted by c2h (Post 20044081)
To be fair, it was reported that MH was ready back in Nov 2012 but delayed their entry until the peak holiday season ends thus Feb 1. So 18 months exactly.

Although given Sri Lankan was announced in June 2012, it runs into the same Xmas period at 18 months
1 Feb 2014 could well be its potential date

Guy Betsy Jan 15, 2013 5:17 am

I suspect that QR's join date will be mid-2014 !

Why is it that new potential Oneworld members take ages to integrate into the system whereas *A and ST new members seem to come online very quickly?

J_Fleish Jan 15, 2013 8:05 am

I wouldn't only say it takes one worlds new members ages to come online it seems it takes most members around the same time. Star Alliance had Air India joining for 3 years before revoking their membership. Garuda is taking 3 years to join sky team so its not just oneworld and 12-18 month joining process seems to be normal.

themapelligroup Jan 15, 2013 9:37 am

Sri Lankan may join not so later due to its "size": it's a small carrier of a small nation, integration could be faster than others (see MH).
I guess Qatar wants to be fully integrated at the time new Doha airport opens: my two cents are on that date.

ernestnywang Jan 16, 2013 3:38 pm


Originally Posted by Guy Betsy (Post 20049817)
I suspect that QR's join date will be mid-2014 !

Why is it that new potential Oneworld members take ages to integrate into the system whereas *A and ST new members seem to come online very quickly?

I thought that's why OW moved to the cloud network system. It is supposed to expediate new member integration from now on. In the past each OW members have to set up individuals "links" (direct access). Now they just have to link to the OW server.

Dan72 Jan 17, 2013 4:57 pm


Originally Posted by c2h (Post 20044081)
To be fair, it was reported that MH was ready back in Nov 2012 but delayed their entry until the peak holiday season ends thus Feb 1. So 18 months exactly.

They also quoted 'administrative reasons', which suggests they weren't completely ready, it is an administrative process after all. Alternatively, perhaps they were genuinely surprised that the northern European Winter/Christmas holidays was going to be a busy time..?

MH used to aspire to SQ and CX, but they are quite third tier, falling below TG service standards.

Austinrunner Jan 17, 2013 5:02 pm

The above is pure speculation about what "administrative reasons" means. It could mean anything.

Himeno Jan 18, 2013 6:23 am


Originally Posted by Austinrunner (Post 20070840)
The above is pure speculation about what "administrative reasons" means. It could mean anything.

Like the availability of member airline CEOs
http://www.malaysianwings.net/forum/...16183&p=314815

themapelligroup Jan 18, 2013 7:28 am

On MH YouTube channel their posting videos of their joining process, featuring MH's CEO, who by the way has my same backpack :), and other management's people.

http://m.youtube.com/user/mastravel

Dan72 Jan 19, 2013 7:58 am


Originally Posted by Austinrunner (Post 20070840)
The above is pure speculation about what "administrative reasons" means. It could mean anything.

But if they were ready to join, why wouldn't they? Joining an alliance is essentially an administrative process, to say that they are ready, but are delaying for administrative reasons, is nonsensical. And to quote the busy Christmas period, as a reason, when it happens at the same time each year, and at the time they previously announced they were joining, highlights some of the poor management that is often seen at MH.

Himeno Jan 19, 2013 5:37 pm


Originally Posted by Dan72 (Post 20081404)
But if they were ready to join, why wouldn't they? Joining an alliance is essentially an administrative process, to say that they are ready, but are delaying for administrative reasons, is nonsensical. And to quote the busy Christmas period, as a reason, when it happens at the same time each year, and at the time they previously announced they were joining, highlights some of the poor management that is often seen at MH.

You are seeing things that don't exist.

Dan72 Jan 20, 2013 6:25 pm


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 20084166)
You are seeing things that don't exist.

Nope. I flown them too many times and seen enough evidence of poor management.

Their reason for delaying their joining date does not stand up to scrutiny, but sure if you don't want to look or are absent reasonable judgement, I guess you won't see anything.

Himeno Jan 20, 2013 8:53 pm


Originally Posted by Dan72 (Post 20090078)
Nope. I flown them too many times and seen enough evidence of poor management.

Their reason for delaying their joining date does not stand up to scrutiny, but sure if you don't want to look or are absent reasonable judgement, I guess you won't see anything.

The reason for not joining yet is quite simple. They require a number of member airline CEO's and Oneworld management to be available and in the same place to sign off on everything. Those people were not available at the same time during December/Jan.

Austinrunner Jan 20, 2013 9:39 pm


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 20090706)
The reason for not joining yet is quite simple. They require a number of member airline CEO's and Oneworld management to be available and in the same place to sign off on everything. Those people were not available at the same time during December/Jan.

Who said that? Sounds like an overly broad inference from a report about a December effective date.

Himeno Jan 20, 2013 10:39 pm


Originally Posted by Austinrunner (Post 20090865)
Who said that? Sounds like an overly broad inference from a report about a December effective date.

MH did


From the company newsletter



Recently on 26 September 2012, representatives from Qantas (QF) and oneworld management company (oMC) completed an intensive ‘Go/ No-Go’ review of MH’s readiness to officially join the oneworld alliance later in the year (MH is currently still a oneworld member-elect).

Following the review, I am pleased to inform that MH has passed the oneworld Go/No Go assessment. In short, MH joining oneworld is a Go!

At the end of the examination, QF and oMC concluded that December 2012 is an achievable target for MH’s entry. oneworld CEOs’ availability is now being sought to confirm an entry date sometime in the week commencing 10 December 2012.


Austinrunner Jan 21, 2013 2:12 am

What does that have to do with 1 February 2013? Seems like you're making an untoward inference here.

Blackcloud Jan 22, 2013 1:59 pm

It will not just be MH systems that will need to be "turned on" for them to join. All members would have to do test/integration work as well and most companies in the Western world have change freezes during the December/January period, and we know it is a peak travel period so there is no way I would want to muck around with booking/reservation/frequent flyer etc systems in this period.
1 Febraury seems to be the agreed date even if all members were ready to go live with MH membership as the risk is too high.

J_Fleish Jan 22, 2013 2:13 pm

I don't see the MH joining is as relevent to this tread as it is with the MH thread in Oneworld Forum. How does MH Joining and earnings affect UL joining we will not know the UL Earning regardless till they join the alliance sometime this year

Kachjc Jan 23, 2013 12:49 am

well according to wiki Qatar is due AUG 2013-I am excited for that!!!

themapelligroup Jan 23, 2013 11:10 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 20105444)
well according to wiki Qatar is due AUG 2013-I am excited for that!!!

Don't trust wiki... Everybody could have written it without any sources.

MiamiPrep Jan 24, 2013 1:29 pm

I Flew Qatar
 

Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 20015106)
Qatar may enter before Sri Lankan cause they have nearly done everything

I hope so. I flew Qatar last year, thought it was top notch!

Kachjc Feb 1, 2013 12:06 am

Sri Lankan?
 
what benefit does this airline bring??

apart from flights to India ( and they are not that big in terms of capacity to India)

they really do not add much to the alliance

HK/SIN/BKK-served by cathay

KL-served by malaysia

and the do not really fly to any other place

Same with Qatar- not many new cities but unlike Sri Lankan it adds huge value and more options


but Oneworld has heaps of gaps in terms of cities they cover-wonder who will be next

Kachjc Feb 1, 2013 12:18 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUXbG58Cxzc

also why do they keep calling Oneworld the world's largest?????- it makes them look Bad
you can call it the highest quality but not largest

cathaychap Feb 1, 2013 3:02 am

Sri Lankan?
 
Maybe, but their service is excellent (at least in J) and it's boom time in SL. Delighted I can start earning Asia Miles when this all kicks off. Their HKG-CMB-LHR fares in J are attractive and a couple of days on a beach near Galle is even more so.

EzzerBKK Feb 1, 2013 6:23 am

Sri Lankan?
 
I second that j service is great and that Sri Lanka is really taking off as a destination. Gotta give them credits. Although indeed doesn't fit in with the OW crowd...

holtju2 Feb 1, 2013 6:27 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 20164293)
and the do not really fly to any other place

Out of my head:
BKK-HKG
BKK-PEK
BKK-PVG
BKK-CAN

MOW-DXB

etc

jerry a. laska Feb 1, 2013 9:46 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 20164293)
what benefit does this airline bring??

apart from flights to India ( and they are not that big in terms of capacity to India)

they really do not add much to the alliance

HK/SIN/BKK-served by cathay

KL-served by malaysia

and the do not really fly to any other place

Same with Qatar- not many new cities but unlike Sri Lankan it adds huge value and more options


but Oneworld has heaps of gaps in terms of cities they cover-wonder who will be next

Maybe review some of the discussion in this thread:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...-oneworld.html


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.