FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Air Berlin to Join oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/1109635-air-berlin-join-oneworld.html)

Flying Lawyer Jul 27, 2010 2:05 pm


Originally Posted by Traveloguy (Post 14374348)
Rubbish. BA has been largely profitable for many many years so your statement above is fiction to say the least.

True. As long as airline business was highly regulated and/or subsidised BA was profitable. However, is was not a problem to be profitable during those days. There was no need to manage an airline, you just had to operate an airline and had a license to print money.

However, at one day they had to start to manage an airline. And at the latest when starting their German adventure profitablity was no longer true. Could they manage in non (or not so much) regulated markets? No. There are only a few profitable airlines, BA is certainly not one of them.

Flying Lawyer Jul 27, 2010 2:10 pm


Originally Posted by Traveloguy (Post 14374348)
The only thing key components missing now are a mainland Chinese, Brazillian and African (Comair is great, but is really just a ZA domestic carrier at the end of the day) carrier. Once those are added (a big 'if' sadly), any further additions will really only be playing at the edges.

And what they certainly need is a capable US addition. OW' AA is currently competing with *A's US, UA, CO and AC. The addition of AB brings OW back into the heart of Europe and this is certainly a move into the right direction, however they need a bit more to compete with giant LH.

Traveloguy Jul 27, 2010 4:25 pm


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14375126)
True. As long as airline business was highly regulated and/or subsidised BA was profitable. However, is was not a problem to be profitable during those days. There was no need to manage an airline, you just had to operate an airline and had a license to print money.

However, at one day they had to start to manage an airline. And at the latest when starting their German adventure profitablity was no longer true. Could they manage in non (or not so much) regulated markets? No. There are only a few profitable airlines, BA is certainly not one of them.

BA was profitable up until the global financial collapse. You write as if it was decades ago and the company is still provided with support from the government. Let's not rewrite history to suit a little journalistic hypochondria!

CXBA Jul 27, 2010 4:40 pm


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14375126)
True. As long as airline business was highly regulated and/or subsidised BA was profitable. However, is was not a problem to be profitable during those days. There was no need to manage an airline, you just had to operate an airline and had a license to print money.

However, at one day they had to start to manage an airline. And at the latest when starting their German adventure profitablity was no longer true. Could they manage in non (or not so much) regulated markets? No. There are only a few profitable airlines, BA is certainly not one of them.

posts like yours are so unhinged and full of rubbish that seems to me AB accession to OW has irked many die hard supporters of the yellow-and-blue cancer :). Perhaps they were expecting emperor Mayrhuber to step in and snap in a moment this last fastidious home mosquito, although with the current disastrous situation of German banking system it is unclear where LH would get the easy cash they're used to. As for airline profitability, unlike you I am not sure if LH would be one of those without the continuous unwavering support of government, regulators (domestic and EU) and financial establishment.
Potentially unstable fellow travelers. One more reason for me to further avoid travel with LH. :D

WingedWorldExplorer Jul 27, 2010 7:22 pm

Grrrreat news.
Should have seen it coming, but I DID NOT.
Closes that central European gap.

Flew AB for the first time this May. I was impressed with their efficiency and service which exceeded a LCC. Especially considering that my fare Milano - Copenhagen was $ 39.00 All-in :)

DownUnderFlyer Jul 27, 2010 7:30 pm


Originally Posted by SwissexLUG (Post 14371993)
The integration process will be a challenge but I don't think AB is a "classical" LCC like Ryanair or easyJet. AB already works more or less like a network carrier and this may help in the integration process.

Some features:
- AB allows connections and checks your bags through
- AB has a frequent flyer program with other airline partners (S7 among others)
- AB has two classes of services (long-haul)
- AB uses main airports (e.g. FRA,TXL instead of Hahn or Schönfeld), most of which already have a OW lounge
- AB's IT is connected to the ESTA, API databases for US bound passengers
- you can buy AB ticket through consolidators and/or online agencies (e.g. ebookers, expedia.de, etc.)
- you should be able to buy AB tickets through TAs as well (I'm not sure though)
- AB has a limited hub-and-spoke model in TXL & DUS (you can for instance fly from ZRH via DUS to MIA, your bag is checked through, you get boarding passes for the DUS-MIA leg in ZRH, the check-in agent at ZRH enters your API details for the US and checks whether you are ESTA compliant, etc.)


AB is more like B6 in the US which offers you connecting flights, booking via online agencies such as Expedia, etc. They are a low-fare network carrier.


Originally Posted by IC6A (Post 14371942)
I guess they want:
1>, OW Frequent flyers who may purchase its Business class ticket to support their revunue on long haul routes
2>, OW's network so AB can sell ticket in Germany to its members to anywhere in the world
3>, OW's structure that will make AB more competitive
4>, OW's leisure travelers who will use AB's European network to travel within EU. AB will have the potential to sell majority of the Europe Pass sectors for its frequency and network.
5>, OW's member airlines to work together with AB to make DUS a better hub with a future Berlin hub in the new Berlin airport which due to open in 2012. So when AB fully integrated into OW (possibly late 2011 early 2012) OW will have the new Berlin BBL airport (code BER) as one hub
6>, OW's international routes into Frankfurt so AB could benefits from the codeshare out of FRA.

I agree with all of this. However I don't think the advantage for AB is as strong as it might be for a carrier better connected at the classical hubs.


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14373775)
As far as I can tell, this benefits only Germans

AB has a lot of point to point connections outside Germany and with their hub in Palma is a nice option for that corner of the Mediterranean as well.

Supersonic Swinger Jul 28, 2010 1:47 am


Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer (Post 14376774)
I agree with all of this. However I don't think the advantage for AB is as strong as it might be for a carrier better connected at the classical hubs.

The hope is that joining OW is another step in AB's evolution as a carrier and this speeds those connections. I know I would welcome ANY opportunity to get to European destinations without having to fly all the way to LHR and then back-track!

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 2:05 am


Originally Posted by CXBA (Post 14376063)
posts like yours are so unhinged and full of rubbish that seems to me AB accession to OW has irked many die hard supporters of the yellow-and-blue cancer :). Perhaps they were expecting emperor Mayrhuber to step in and snap in a moment this last fastidious home mosquito, although with the current disastrous situation of German banking system it is unclear where LH would get the easy cash they're used to. As for airline profitability, unlike you I am not sure if LH would be one of those without the continuous unwavering support of government, regulators (domestic and EU) and financial establishment.
Potentially unstable fellow travelers. One more reason for me to further avoid travel with LH. :D

Sorry, I am not going to take this anyhow seriously. Disastrous situation of German banking system? Easy cash required for LH? Unwavering support of government? Sorry, but you obviously suffer from some kind of airline paranoia. :p

I do about 100 flight on AB, 100 flights on LH and 30 flights on BA a year and I am certainly a happy traveller with all of them (in the ranking of the names mentioned).

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 2:18 am


Originally Posted by Traveloguy (Post 14375987)
BA was profitable up until the global financial collapse. You write as if it was decades ago and the company is still provided with support from the government. Let's not rewrite history to suit a little journalistic hypochondria!

So the global financial collapse for BA began in early 2007 when the share price went down dramatically?

mosburger Jul 28, 2010 2:44 am

As far DUS, TXL/BBI and Germany in general are concerned, I do think Air Berlin brings OW airlines and passengers several big advantages:

- Better OW corporate products and sales/after-sales presence regarding corporate customers

- Of course other OW products such as RTW tickets get more interesting especially ex-Germany

- Better presence at German airports, from being able to check-in early to handling irregularities. This has been a major irritation so far, IMHO.

- Better ability to offer alternative OW connections in case of irregularities ex-Germany

etc.etc.

Shuttle Jul 28, 2010 2:44 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14378082)
Unwavering support of government? Sorry, but you obviously suffer from some kind of airline paranoia. :p

So, the repeated denial by the authorities for additional frequencies/access to new airports in Germany requested by Middle Eastern-based carriers is not due to tacit government support for a certain German-based airline?

Compare with the abundant growth of London and regional airports in the UK served by Emirates, Qatar, Ethihad...

Then we have the example of Emirates, amongst others, being forced to raise prices by the German Government because they were undercutting Lufthansa:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLJ44779920091119


Shuttle

lhahne Jul 28, 2010 3:36 am


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14373775)
As far as I can tell, this benefits only Germans and the only business value to BA and Finnair is an attack on Lufthansa. Right?

I think Finnair wants AB to feed its large Asian operation as AB has Asian routes only to Thailand.

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 3:40 am


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378158)
So, the repeated denial by the authorities for additional frequencies/access to new airports in Germany requested by Middle Eastern-based carriers is not due to tacit government support for a certain German-based airline?.

Even if this is fully off-topic, you should make yourself familiar with the contractual situation between Germany and the UAE. The UAE airlines are contractually allowed to fly into four airports in Germany. Emirates operates from Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg und München. Ethihad operates ex Frankfurt only. If they want to have more, they need to renegotiate the bilateral air transport agreement.


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378158)
Compare with the abundant growth of London and regional airports in the UK served by Emirates, Qatar, Ethihad...

Emirates operates ex London, Newcastle, Manchaster, Glasgow and Birmingham, Ethihad operates from London/Heathrow, Manchester. Four vs. five. Not a big difference at all. And I am pretty sure UK airlines have for historical reasons a higher frequency into the Gulf than LH and AB have.


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378158)
Then we have the example of Emirates, amongst others, being forced to raise prices by the German Government because they were undercutting Lufthansa:

Certainly interesting, but please read it:


The German government said in a letter seen by Reuters that it was illegal for non-EU airlines such as Emirates to undercut the prices of other carriers on routes from Germany to non-EU destinations, citing its international bilateral air transport agreements and European Parliament rules.
True. German government insisted on the bilateral air transport agreement prohibiting dumping fare. The UAE airlines try to rewrite the bilateral air transport agreement. However, you always need to to modify a contract.

mosburger Jul 28, 2010 3:48 am


Originally Posted by lhahne (Post 14378273)
I think Finnair wants AB to feed its large Asian operation as AB has Asian routes only to Thailand.

I think most if not all European legacy airlines would be glad to get rid of their shorthaul flights. Wasn't Lufthansa considering transferring European flights to Germanwings already a while ago? Not sure if some routes have actually had a low key takeover by GW?

stimpy Jul 28, 2010 4:14 am


Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer (Post 14376774)
AB has a lot of point to point connections outside Germany and with their hub in Palma is a nice option for that corner of the Mediterranean as well.

Thanks. I remember seeing a whole lot of Air Berlin planes in Palma the last time I was there, but I just thought it was a popular destination for Germans! I didn't know they had other PtP routes.

I am pretty ignorant of AB since they don't serve my airport (LYS). And since LH does serve LYS (to FRA, MUC and DUS), all my trips to Germany are with LH or by train. If AB were to add LYS as a destination, I would certainly be interested!

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 5:14 am


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14378338)
I am pretty ignorant of AB since they don't serve my airport (LYS). And since LH does serve LYS (to FRA, MUC and DUS), all my trips to Germany are with LH or by train. If AB were to add LYS as a destination, I would certainly be interested!

What they actually do it to fly into PMI (i) from the Portugese and Spanish mainland and the other Balearic Ilses and (ii) from plenty of German major and regional airports and some European (AMS, BSL, GRZ, VIE, INN, CPH, SZG, ZRH) airports and offer quite convenient connections between these regions via PMI in some cases three times a day. It always looks quite impressive to have a fleet of 20 or so read AB birds in the PMI evening sun.

Shuttle Jul 28, 2010 5:29 am

I am thrilled that OneWorld have become more 'proactive' in recruiting members from an ever diminishing pool and am similarly happy that the latest airline is Air Berlin. Hopefully this will enable BA to maintain a robust schedule to its existing German destinations.

However, this article relating the topic:

http://www.centreforaviation.com/new...n-europe/page1

also makes slightly depressing reading for any OneWorld fanboys/girls, as one could conclude that OW is not trying to get Aer Lingus, which is currently running a beauty parade amongst the alliances, back into OW.

One the other hand, I remember reading, not so many moons ago, OW did stating that it did not need more than 12 members and would stop recruiting after that - clearly a position that they have re-evaluated ;)

Aisle Seat H Jul 29, 2010 4:29 am

AB/OW press conference announcing move can be watched here - http://www.airberlin.com/site/landin...eworld_EN.html

stimpy Jul 29, 2010 4:43 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14378505)
What they actually do it to fly into PMI (i) from the Portugese and Spanish mainland and the other Balearic Ilses and (ii) from plenty of German major and regional airports and some European (AMS, BSL, GRZ, VIE, INN, CPH, SZG, ZRH) airports and offer quite convenient connections between these regions via PMI in some cases three times a day. It always looks quite impressive to have a fleet of 20 or so read AB birds in the PMI evening sun.

That reminds me of a trivia question. What is the busiest airport in Europe in the summer? It is PMI! The airport operates 24 hours per day which means they can handle more flights than LHR, FRA, CDG or any other airport.

Traveloguy Jul 29, 2010 7:41 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14375154)
And what they certainly need is a capable US addition. OW' AA is currently competing with *A's US, UA, CO and AC. The addition of AB brings OW back into the heart of Europe and this is certainly a move into the right direction, however they need a bit more to compete with giant LH.

Why? AA actually has a very decent network. You don't necessarily have to be the biggest. Also remember MX has joined oneWorld so North American coverage is actually pretty decent.

Out of interest, is there a particular destination which you feel the OW network is unable to cater for?


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14378101)
So the global financial collapse for BA began in early 2007 when the share price went down dramatically?

Yes. Remember in 2007 there were lots of concerns about the system already before the big crash occurred later that year. BA was a very easy target due to it's known pension problem which at the end of the day is still the carrier's core issue to resolve. You still can't deny that it was highly profitable by European standards for a very long time, and arguably more so than even LH. BA's biggest mistake was not putting more money aside sooner to sure up the pension deficit as well as changing the pension itself to either remove benefits or push employees to put more money into the system.

Traveloguy Jul 29, 2010 7:55 am


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378560)
However, this article relating the topic:

http://www.centreforaviation.com/new...n-europe/page1

also makes slightly depressing reading for any OneWorld fanboys/girls, as one could conclude that OW is not trying to get Aer Lingus, which is currently running a beauty parade amongst the alliances, back into OW.

The language used by OW certainly does indicate that EI won't be allowed back in.

stimpy Jul 29, 2010 7:59 am

I don't know why any alliance would want EI in their group. I think Ireland will just remain a black hole of decent commercial aviation.

Shuttle Jul 29, 2010 11:02 am


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14385577)
I don't know why any alliance would want EI in their group. I think Ireland will just remain a black hole of decent commercial aviation.

Having spent several miserable hours in EI's DUB Gold Circle 'lounge' wating for an increasingly delayed EI flight back to LHR (and watching the bmi flight that all my other colleagues were on push back, on time, hours before me), I am tempted to agree. However, I think that EI and oneworld are as compatable today as they were originally, if only for the EI-BA relationship: which to a non-expert seems good from an geographical and symbiotic perspective for the two airlines. As for EI's lack of european J-class, now that my employer has banned short-haul business class travel post-credit crunch, perversely, traveling on one-class carriers is better, as at least I don't contemplate I am missing out on anything... :)

Nonetheless, I think that EI is Star's to loose, what with the UA partnership and EI's adamant determination that they do not want to move from their current T1 base (voiced when the LHR terminal alliance alignments were first mooted and they were still in OW)... which of course is now the Star hub.

Shuttle

toyotaboy95 Jul 31, 2010 11:49 pm


Originally Posted by edison (Post 14372044)
Excellent news! Now OW needs a decent African airline to fill the gaps ....

Comair is actually doing a decent job in South Africa.

daniel-andersson Aug 2, 2010 7:36 am


Originally Posted by moa999 (Post 14370069)
In my mind key features of LCC are missed by AB.
No inclusions - AB has meals and alcohol on some flights
Short haul - AB flies to the US, Asia
Single type - AB runs six different aircraft type
Single class - AB has Business class and XL seats
No lounges - AB has lounges

Even if AB has a pretty big network, is a low cost airline. They usually have tickets for 29€ (where 28€ are taxes). And their "meal" in cabin, is sometimes not more than a muffin. One significant drawback with Airberlin is that the one-time-record is really bad. Being delayed for over two hours are not too unusual.

Aisle Seat H Aug 2, 2010 8:12 am


Originally Posted by daniel-andersson (Post 14406772)
And their "meal" in cabin, is sometimes not more than a muffin. One significant drawback with Airberlin is that the one-time-record is really bad. Being delayed for over two hours are not too unusual.

Ah, so you mean they are exactly the same as BA then?!?

On Euro flights (and on domestic of course) food is often just a cookie/biscuit/etc (only at meal times on Euro flights is there something more substantial), and I have lost count how many times on BA shorthaul I have been delayed for longer than the duration of the flight itself (I must have had an hour and a half or more delay 10 to 15 times on BA Euro and domestic flights in just the last two years [about 1 in 5 of all the flights I have taken with them, and about 1 in 3 of the shorthaul flights I have taken with them).

And on AA you have to pay for alcoholic drinks longhaul and even for food on domestic, while both are free on AB.

In fact on American Eagle AA flights they even have the temerity to charge $3 for the nuts!!! (See 3/4 of the way down the page - http://www.aa.com/i18n/travelInforma...ealService.jsp)

So in this regard they are as, or even less, 'low-cost' that a few established OW (so-called) 'full service' carriers!

So AB will fit in very nicely with their new partners! ;)

jerry a. laska Aug 2, 2010 10:17 am


Originally Posted by daniel-andersson (Post 14406772)
Even if AB has a pretty big network, is a low cost airline. They usually have tickets for 29€ (where 28€ are taxes). And their "meal" in cabin, is sometimes not more than a muffin. One significant drawback with Airberlin is that the one-time-record is really bad. Being delayed for over two hours are not too unusual.

A cursory look at the stats doesn't look too bad:
AB
http://www.flightstats.com/go/Flight...%29+Air+Berlin
BA
http://www.flightstats.com/go/Flight...ways&x=35&y=12

DownUnderFlyer Aug 2, 2010 6:39 pm


Originally Posted by Aisle Seat H (Post 14406943)
Ah, so you mean they are exactly the same as BA then?!?

On Euro flights (and on domestic of course) food is often just a cookie/biscuit/etc (only at meal times on Euro flights is there something more substantial), and I have lost count how many times on BA shorthaul I have been delayed for longer than the duration of the flight itself (I must have had an hour and a half or more delay 10 to 15 times on BA Euro and domestic flights in just the last two years [about 1 in 5 of all the flights I have taken with them, and about 1 in 3 of the shorthaul flights I have taken with them).

And on AA you have to pay for alcoholic drinks longhaul and even for food on domestic, while both are free on AB.

In fact on American Eagle AA flights they even have the temerity to charge $3 for the nuts!!! (See 3/4 of the way down the page - http://www.aa.com/i18n/travelInforma...ealService.jsp)

So in this regard they are as, or even less, 'low-cost' that a few established OW (so-called) 'full service' carriers!

So AB will fit in very nicely with their new partners! ;)

Thanks for that, it certainly puts things into perspective.

Flying Lawyer Aug 3, 2010 10:04 am


Originally Posted by daniel-andersson (Post 14406772)
Even if AB has a pretty big network, is a low cost airline. They usually have tickets for 29€ (where 28€ are taxes). And their "meal" in cabin, is sometimes not more than a muffin. One significant drawback with Airberlin is that the one-time-record is really bad. Being delayed for over two hours are not too unusual.

It is a bit like LH or BA, ain't it? Without a "meal" in the Y-cabin and with no newspapers. And LH usually has ticket for 88 Euro return (where 86 Euro are taxes). Most legacy carriers are a hybrid today between the former type of LCC and the former type of legacy carrier.

UA Fan Aug 3, 2010 10:10 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14414522)
And LH usually has ticket for 88 Euro return (where 86 Euro are taxes).

True, LOL.

Tyrolean Aug 5, 2010 6:13 am

Domestic in Germany AB offers a better service than LH.
LH: Drinks only
AB: Drinks+small snack+Magazines

From the day they join I will use them much more frequently.

Sagy Aug 6, 2010 6:46 pm

Does anyone as an insight to possability of milage accural on OW airlines (yes I know they have a partnership with S7) being offered before AB becomes part of OW?

Thanks in advance

Tyrolean Aug 7, 2010 4:51 am


Originally Posted by Sagy (Post 14436383)
Does anyone as an insight to possability of milage accural on OW airlines (yes I know they have a partnership with S7) being offered before AB becomes part of OW?

Thanks in advance

Only Hainan and S7 at the moment (yes and all the affiliates like Belair and Niki) We should wait a bit.

Dan72 Aug 8, 2010 8:05 am


Originally Posted by daniel-andersson (Post 14406772)
Even if AB has a pretty big network, is a low cost airline. They usually have tickets for 29€ (where 28€ are taxes). And their "meal" in cabin, is sometimes not more than a muffin. One significant drawback with Airberlin is that the one-time-record is really bad. Being delayed for over two hours are not too unusual.

To add to the points above on catering, the offering is not bad and comparable to many full service airlines these days. And compared to SK, I'm sure you'll agree it's much better.

jahason Aug 9, 2010 6:28 am


Originally Posted by Dan72 (Post 14442328)
To add to the points above on catering, the offering is not bad and comparable to many full service airlines these days. And compared to SK, I'm sure you'll agree it's much better.

Not much better than airlines in Europe or Nth America. But catering in Asia is in a league above.

Flying Lawyer Aug 9, 2010 3:02 pm


Originally Posted by jahason (Post 14447105)
Not much better than airlines in Europe or Nth America. But catering in Asia is in a league above.

Well, we are talking about Y. There are not only a few legacy carriers that will give you nothing for free.

giblet Jan 10, 2011 9:03 am

Any idea when we'll be able to redeem AA miles for awards on Air Berlin?

DownUnderFlyer Jan 10, 2011 5:06 pm


Originally Posted by giblet (Post 15625313)
Any idea when we'll be able to redeem AA miles for awards on Air Berlin?

After they have joined oneworld which is expected to happen in the first half of 2012.

giblet Jan 10, 2011 7:38 pm


Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer (Post 15629161)
After they have joined oneworld which is expected to happen in the first half of 2012.

Interesting. I was on the phone with AA yesterday about award flights and she said the information she had was that award tickets would be available in the first quarter of 2011.

ByrdluvsAWACO Jan 11, 2011 1:31 pm


Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer (Post 15629161)
After they have joined oneworld which is expected to happen in the first half of 2012.

There was some talk from AA about launching some codeshares well before 2012. So redemptions are not necessarily tied to AB's OW entry date.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:04 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.