White Island (NZ) volcano erupts
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12292240
There were apparently some tourists at the island (from cruise ship Ovation of the Seas, and perhaps others), and there are injuries and some people initially unaccounted for. This is near a common port, Tauranga. We sailed here (different cruise line), and stopped at this port just two weeks ago. GC |
Another report from the other NZ news source
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/118...-bay-of-plenty <snip> At least one person has been critically injured, and many more are still missing, after White Island erupted, spewing plumes of smoke into the air on Monday. Up to 100 people were initially believed to be on or near the island at the time of the eruption around 2.30pm, but police now believe there were fewer than 50. "Some of those people have been transported to shore, however a number believed to be on the island are currently unaccounted for," police said in a statement. <snip> https://www.geonet.org.nz/volcano/ca...eislandwestrim https://www.geonet.org.nz/volcano/ca...slandcraterrim https://www.geonet.org.nz/volcano/ca...andcraterfloor New camera's may be needed now |
Geologists and vulcanologists have been saying for years that tourist visits there were a disaster waiting to happen. When you poke the tiger enough times, you'll eventually get bitten.
|
Originally Posted by LondonElite
(Post 31820924)
Geologists and vulcanologists have been saying for years that tourist visits there were a disaster waiting to happen. When you poke the tiger enough times, you'll eventually get bitten.
I've visited White Island. It's one of the coolest places I've ever been, and I wouldn't hesitate to visit any more than I would hesitate to visit earthquake-prone California (which, incidentally, has killed 130 people and injured 14,000 in the last 30 years). |
From 05:00 NZ time---> https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/118...east-five-dead
<snip> The New Zealand Defence Force is attempting to deploy drones over White Island at first light on Tuesday, after a volcanic eruption left at least five people dead. An unknown number of people remain missing, presumed dead this morning, after the volcano erupted while tour groups were visiting at 2.11pm on Monday. Flights over the island had spotted no signs of life since the eruption happened, and police said late on Monday there were not thought to be any more survivors. However, emergency services had not yet been able to land on the island as it remained too dangerous. Police and tour operators are today working urgently to confirm the exact number of dead, thought to be "in double digits", while 18 survivors were being treated for their injuries. <snip> Update 05:50 NZ time https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12292240
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rotorua-d...ectid=12292380 White Island eruption: Chopper footage shows volcano devastation At first it's only a plume of smoke and steam in the distance. But as the Westpac Rescue Helicopter gets closer to Whakaari/White Island, the extent of the eruption becomes clearer. The huge white cloud continues to billow from the crater, and a flyover shows sediment streaming hundreds of metres out into the ocean. The chopper lands in a moonscape of thick ash, the chopper's blades whipping up clouds of dust. Two crew members are left on the ground unloading rescue equipment; they duck their heads and try to keep the ash out of their faces as the chopper climbs back into the air. The footage also shows a building that appears to be damaged and half-buried in ash. In photos shot by the crew people are visible standing the beach, standing on the edge of a rock- and ash-strewn landscape. An Auckland Westpac Rescue Helicopter Trust spokesman said the first crew had left for Whakaari/White Island at 2.40pm; the second at 2.45pm. <snip> |
I wonder who is at fault here in this tragedy.
|
Originally Posted by Annalisa12
(Post 31824439)
I wonder who is at fault here in this tragedy.
- the travel operators (for promoting these trips) - the government (for allowing travel there in the first place) - God/nature (for causing the eruption) Take your pick! |
i posted this in the Cruise forum.
"I am just back from the region. I researched this tour - not off a cruise line, but as a highly touted day tour excursion for all travelers. The White Island Tour company's website indicated that participants are given hard hats - presumably as emissions of rock and ash are possible. I decided this and several other subtle comments indicated that the our was beyond typical "adventure travel". I put it into the "you've got to be crazy" category and took a pass. Obviously not an over cautious assessment. .., I do feel for those involved, I don't mean to take a "blame the victim" approach. Perhaps a little more info might have stopped some from joining the tour. Travelers do ultimately have to take responsibility for their decisions, but tour companies also need to be forthcoming on full risks. (I say this as one who just a couple weeks ago in New Zealand decided that the guided hiking tour I was on was above my abilities and I happily and prudently bowed out. It was not possible to ascertain the technical demands from the promotional material.)" |
There has to be someone to blame, then you can sue. I have seen early comments that the cruise line was at fault for not doing proper due diligence for the passengers taking one of their shore excursions.
|
Originally Posted by javabytes
(Post 31821248)
I've visited White Island. It's one of the coolest places I've ever been, and I wouldn't hesitate to visit any more than I would hesitate to visit earthquake-prone California (which, incidentally, has killed 130 people and injured 14,000 in the last 30 years).
If the tours were adequately informed of the risk, then it's bad luck for the tourists. But don't act like the risk was the same as going to Disneyland. |
Originally Posted by gbs1112
(Post 31825688)
There has to be someone to blame, then you can sue. I have seen early comments that the cruise line was at fault for not doing proper due diligence for the passengers taking one of their shore excursions.
Even a quick look at the Wikipedia page suggests there is the risk of something going wrong. Whakaari erupted continually from December 1975 until September 2000, marking the world's longest historic eruption episode, according to GeoNet, and also in 2012, 2016, and 2019. |
Originally Posted by gbs1112
(Post 31825688)
There has to be someone to blame, then you can sue. I have seen early comments that the cruise line was at fault for not doing proper due diligence for the passengers taking one of their shore excursions.
|
Originally Posted by nancypants
(Post 31827373)
yeah but this is New Zealand so no one will be suing anyone, regardless of fault
NZ did announce a criminal investigation, and later corrected it to say it is not criminal yet, so maybe no suing. Saw a reporter from stuff.nz recount having taken the tour a few months ago and was not briefed on any safety procedures except for the helicopter but none for the island, did not know of the existence of the shelter (a cargo container fitted with emergency supplies, placed on the island a few years ago), or how to evacuate. Also claimed that the disclosure of risks did not mention volcanic eruption, only that there are geysers unexpectedly and they are hot. Irony is that island is privately owned by the Buttle family trust, bought by Mr. Buttle in 1936 in order to preserve it without human contact (had big mutton bird population at the time, and prior history of mining for sulfur). After he died the trust eventually started tourist visits, making a large income from that over the years -- I guess he didn't specify the trust documents in sufficient detail about eliminating human presence on the island. The NZ gov't did offer to buy it in 1953 but it was kept private and brings in several million dollars a year in revenue. |
An interesting opinion piece. And one that I more or less agree with.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania...11-p53j38.html |
I visited in 2017. The guides were asked questions about the risks of eruptions and how come visits are permitted. The reply was something along the lines of volcano activity is monitored and visits would be suspended if certain warning signs increased.
I don't remember exactly but there was also some sort of evacuation procedure mentioned - not sure how effective this would have been though... Not sure how anyone who hasn't studied geology would be adequately informed to judge the risk. From the linked SMH article (note, written by a Kiwi and aimed at Kiwis): One report suggested that more emphasis was placed on the risk of seasickness than on the possibility of fatal burns and damage to internal organs from toxic gas and ash. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:57 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.