U.S. Airlines' Secret Million-Mile Awards- Where is NW ??
#31
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,884
Interesting idea, however there is no such thing as an 'unofficial' tier. We either have one and the programming to support it correctly or we don't. In any event, let me assure you that the plight of a non-rev passenger would never be a thought in the design process (...and I agree with that both personally and professionally).
NW scoop
NW scoop
The non-rev thing was just a joke. Hope you got that.
#32
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Programs: NW-PE, Blue Star SeaSmiles
Posts: 6,789
You know perhaps it time to try something totally new that programming will support. Elite Perks allows us to gift status to a person of our choosing after accumulating "x" amount of EQM in a year. I know that this program may not live past this year but could we extend the idea. Lets say you fly "x" EQM over some amount of years or during your entire NWA and the reward would be a "get of jail" card that allows you to reestablish elite status for the standard time period that we abide by now. This gift would allow you to bring NWA back into your life when the time is right to cash in a "get of jail card"
As an alternative gift, maybe our WP numbers could be a non-expiring e-cert that allows us to access exit rows and P seating when our name is on the reservation? Not sure if this is programmatically possible.
As an alternative gift, maybe our WP numbers could be a non-expiring e-cert that allows us to access exit rows and P seating when our name is on the reservation? Not sure if this is programmatically possible.
Last edited by Blank Sheet; Jul 31, 2007 at 2:09 pm Reason: syntax
#33
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Delta Platinum
Posts: 1,732
I tend to believe that a balance can be achieved if the current Elite fliers get the upgrades before the 'Retired' folks. Perhaps a priority something like what SchmutzigMSP noted:
Current Plats
Current Plat Companions
Current Gold
Current Gold Companions
Current Silver
-non-revs?
Retired Plat
Retired Gold
Retired Silver
Not quite sure where to put non-revs into the mix. Of course, the 'Retired' status would only kick in for the years that the flier failed to reach any of the current elite levels. Basically the idea would be that after all the current loyal customers and non-revs are taken care of, any leftovers would go to the retired. Not quite sure if anyone would ever score an upgrade, but IMHO, the better benefit would be the lifetime of priority screening and boarding for the retired passengers.
Current Plats
Current Plat Companions
Current Gold
Current Gold Companions
Current Silver
-non-revs?
Retired Plat
Retired Gold
Retired Silver
Not quite sure where to put non-revs into the mix. Of course, the 'Retired' status would only kick in for the years that the flier failed to reach any of the current elite levels. Basically the idea would be that after all the current loyal customers and non-revs are taken care of, any leftovers would go to the retired. Not quite sure if anyone would ever score an upgrade, but IMHO, the better benefit would be the lifetime of priority screening and boarding for the retired passengers.
#34
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DTW
Programs: NW Platinum Elite, *Wood Platinum, HHonors Diamond, Hertz PC, National Exec Elite
Posts: 1,644
You wouldn't just be able to lump in "retired". It would have to be based on miles flown. You can't have a person who hit PE one year then never fly again be considered a retired plat. Not fair to the ones who fly 15 years as a plat.
But I think everyone is on to something, perhaps a level that allows for access to P seating, last in line for UG's (hey, at least there would be hope), increased access to awards, and perhaps priority screening.
But you'd have to be careful not to dilute the benefits, which I think NW has done a great job doing. I mean, what happens when a retired gets an awesome exit row, and a current 10 year PE sits in a middle regular coach seat. It's too hard to break down the benefits relative to the miles flown.
But I think everyone is on to something, perhaps a level that allows for access to P seating, last in line for UG's (hey, at least there would be hope), increased access to awards, and perhaps priority screening.
But you'd have to be careful not to dilute the benefits, which I think NW has done a great job doing. I mean, what happens when a retired gets an awesome exit row, and a current 10 year PE sits in a middle regular coach seat. It's too hard to break down the benefits relative to the miles flown.
#35
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,884
Well, to be fair, the newly minted Silver could take "my" exit row seat tomorrow and I'm a 4th-year PE. Just as I could take the 15-year PE's exit row next week, etc. NW has decided to open up the "good" coach seats to all elites (and "Premium fare" flyers as well), so that particular scenario wouldn't create much of a problem based on the current system.
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAX/BOS/HKG/AMS/SFO...hmm, I need a life.
Programs: United1K, AA ExPlAAt, DL MM/Gold, Hilton Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 13,316
Thanks for personally following up on this issue, scoop.
I've had the privilege to fly non-revenue a few times in my life. As such, a non-revenue passenger only becomes eligible for a seat after all revenue passengers have been assigned their seats and then, if there are seats available, they can be distributed among the non-revenue passengers based on a proprietary formula amongst themselves.
Perhaps an adaptation of that could be implemented, sort of like an unofficial fourth tier of elite status, like a "retired elite". After all Plats, Golds, Silvers, and Plats, Golds, Silvers on award tickets are upgraded, then perhaps the retired elites could be upgraded. It would still be something for the former high-mileage fliers and it wouldn't really hurt the bottom line of NW all that much. Although, admittedly, it may slightly reduce the availability of first class seats for current NW employees trying to non-rev up there...
I've had the privilege to fly non-revenue a few times in my life. As such, a non-revenue passenger only becomes eligible for a seat after all revenue passengers have been assigned their seats and then, if there are seats available, they can be distributed among the non-revenue passengers based on a proprietary formula amongst themselves.
Perhaps an adaptation of that could be implemented, sort of like an unofficial fourth tier of elite status, like a "retired elite". After all Plats, Golds, Silvers, and Plats, Golds, Silvers on award tickets are upgraded, then perhaps the retired elites could be upgraded. It would still be something for the former high-mileage fliers and it wouldn't really hurt the bottom line of NW all that much. Although, admittedly, it may slightly reduce the availability of first class seats for current NW employees trying to non-rev up there...
#37
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Delta Platinum
Posts: 1,732
Could also just keep it very simple. Say 2mm and you get 'Retired' period. No levels. Just Retired Elite if you don't requalify. Gets you low man on the totem pole for upgrades but gets you the elite security lines, priority boarding, and Elite seating. I'd be happy with that (although I seriously doubt that I'd ever hit 2mm BIS miles...may have had a chance if I spent my 5 years as CO Plat with NW instead ;-)
Either way, thanks just for considering it.
Either way, thanks just for considering it.
#38
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC
Posts: 1,822
I'm puzzled as this discussion is missing some key points
1. THe FFP is probably the most profitabole part of NWA. Why wouldn't they want folks to use a NWA credit card, partners etc to reach 1,000,000 miles
2. It is not just about rewarding long term platinums (like me) it is also about generating revenue. The fact I'm AA lifetime gold means I will always choose NW (or a skyteam partner) then AA then US, UA, etc
3. Folks move and people's flying patterns change. In fact the weekly travel consultant is a low revenue person for NWA - You can get platinum for less than $5000 on cheap week to week fares. Whereas the occasional Full fare last minute traveller is valuable. I've spent way more on AA this year (some $1000 RT's) than NWA - Yet have earnt 4 times the miles on NW than AA.
4. Dilution arguments are pretty week if you copy AA's program. There is no Executive plt match in AA so the best flyers are protected. How many lifetime Platinums (NW Golds) are there that dilute the pool because they don't already earn Platinum/Gold - Not much dilution occurs for a 2 trips a year person.
1. THe FFP is probably the most profitabole part of NWA. Why wouldn't they want folks to use a NWA credit card, partners etc to reach 1,000,000 miles
2. It is not just about rewarding long term platinums (like me) it is also about generating revenue. The fact I'm AA lifetime gold means I will always choose NW (or a skyteam partner) then AA then US, UA, etc
3. Folks move and people's flying patterns change. In fact the weekly travel consultant is a low revenue person for NWA - You can get platinum for less than $5000 on cheap week to week fares. Whereas the occasional Full fare last minute traveller is valuable. I've spent way more on AA this year (some $1000 RT's) than NWA - Yet have earnt 4 times the miles on NW than AA.
4. Dilution arguments are pretty week if you copy AA's program. There is no Executive plt match in AA so the best flyers are protected. How many lifetime Platinums (NW Golds) are there that dilute the pool because they don't already earn Platinum/Gold - Not much dilution occurs for a 2 trips a year person.
#39
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,884
3. Folks move and people's flying patterns change. In fact the weekly travel consultant is a low revenue person for NWA - You can get platinum for less than $5000 on cheap week to week fares. Whereas the occasional Full fare last minute traveller is valuable. I've spent way more on AA this year (some $1000 RT's) than NWA - Yet have earnt 4 times the miles on NW than AA.
4. Dilution arguments are pretty week if you copy AA's program. There is no Executive plt match in AA so the best flyers are protected. How many lifetime Platinums (NW Golds) are there that dilute the pool because they don't already earn Platinum/Gold - Not much dilution occurs for a 2 trips a year person.
As I alluded to earlier in the thread, I don't think someone should really be sticking with a program for that lifetime carrot dangling out there. It's almost meaningless because the relative benefits are small, it takes so long to get there (usually), and once you get it, if your premise is that you're only flying 2 or so times per year, you're not really getting much use out of the benefit.
If NW decided to add something like I proposed a few posts ago where at some threshold they were granted "Lifetime Base Elite" or something like that where they might be below current-day Silvers for upgrades, but still enjoy most of the other Silver benefits (pre-boarding, elite carpet, elite security line, priority reservations phone number, etc.) then I think this is something that could really work.
I've warmed to the idea of some sort of lifetime recognition, but I still don't think just giving them the lowest elite tier is the best idea.
#40
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MEL
Programs: DL, QF, QR Gold, MR Lifetime Gold
Posts: 6,999
I agree with the fact that giving away status is diluting the benefits for current Elites.
Every FF program, just like the respective airline, has ups and downs. The key is to choose the one that suits you best. There are many aspects of WP (that we all love) that other FF programs don't have, just as there are benefits that WP lacks in comparison with others. It is unreasonable to expect a program to change just to match others. (Just think if NW would implement the stupid 18 month expiration that US has...)
Having said that, someone who has been a plat for 15 years has enjoyed the plat benefits for all those 15 years. Frankly, I think that's plenty (just think of all the extra miles, all the upgrades, etc.) If that person stopped flying frequently then I don't want to compete with him/her over upgrades or whatnot. Like I said, it's all about what suits you best. If a lifetime status is what is important to you then switch to DL.
Every FF program, just like the respective airline, has ups and downs. The key is to choose the one that suits you best. There are many aspects of WP (that we all love) that other FF programs don't have, just as there are benefits that WP lacks in comparison with others. It is unreasonable to expect a program to change just to match others. (Just think if NW would implement the stupid 18 month expiration that US has...)
Having said that, someone who has been a plat for 15 years has enjoyed the plat benefits for all those 15 years. Frankly, I think that's plenty (just think of all the extra miles, all the upgrades, etc.) If that person stopped flying frequently then I don't want to compete with him/her over upgrades or whatnot. Like I said, it's all about what suits you best. If a lifetime status is what is important to you then switch to DL.
#41
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Astoria, NY: LGA, JFK
Programs: Delta PM; Sheraton's Vistana BOD; SPG Gold
Posts: 2,035
Most of the comments here are written from the standpoint of active, high mileage flyers, who don't want further competition for their upgrades.
At the risk of incuring the wrath of some, I applaud those who have given their loyalty to NW over the years. Their business kept the airline from possible bankrupcy years ago and deserves some recognition.
My own thought is that million mile BIS members should be guaranteed lifetime silver status. No need to create new or special categories and they will not be in competition with platinum and gold members for upgrades.
Those who have been loyal to NW in the past deserve something more than a baggage tag. Note that this would ONLY affect those who do NOT travel 25,000 miles a year. Thus, their impact on the entire system would be minimal to say the least.
#42
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
I hit 1M BIS miles in 1997 and got a Coach Leather Notebook and 2 1 MM luggage tags. I currently have 2.1 EQM and about 1.9+ BIS miles. I will hit 2M BIS miles sometime mid next year at my current rate unless I start doing some international travel which is very unlikely.
Last edited by Yaatri; Aug 7, 2007 at 5:19 am Reason: I mistyped 9 instead of 0.
#43
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA NW Platinum Elite Since 1999, United GoldMM, Hyatt Plat, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold, Hertz #1 Gold, IC Ambassador, Avis Chairman's
Posts: 7,445
Remember ... the 50% "bonus" EQM for biz fares don't count... I'm only at about 700k eqm myself, got a ways to go...
I think, I am still short of a million BIS miles. I am working on my 19th year as a plat and have always flown well above 75K, but never above 95K miles in year. Assuming an average of 80K miles a year, plus the two years I spent as a gold, I should be somewhere between 800K and 1 million BIS miles, more likely around 900K or so. I do not recall receiving anything from NW.
#44
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
I have flown on ly two b or Y fares. One was to London, for work and the other was to Bucharest. Since 2001 all my travel has been personal, so I haven't bought any B/Y fares since then. I might be between 700 and 800 then and might hit MM in 3 more years.
#45
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: NWA Platinum, Million Air
Posts: 12
Just reached 1,000,000 actual miles flowed. NW sent a letter of recognition,$100 coupon off a marriott hotel stay anywhere, a very expensive pen made out of the same composite as the Dreamerliner 787! Cool! And of course a attractrive luggage tag.