Community
Wiki Posts
Search

NWA Fleet Count

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2004, 12:59 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Coppell, Texas
Posts: 1,014
NWA Fleet Count

Does anybody have the fleet count. I am curious how many of the DC-9's and DC-10's are still in service. With the price of fuel surely they are headed for the boneyard?
milesrus is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 2:10 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: RST
Programs: Delta Diamond; Hilton Diamond; Accor Gold
Posts: 4,839
Check out this NWA website for fleet information.
fromYXU is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 2:14 pm
  #3  
azj
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,576
Here's a link to the investor relations section on nwa.com:

http://ir.nwa.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=111021&p=irol-fleet

It's a little out of date however. There are about 99 CRJs and more 330s in the fleet.

NW has been in a DC10 replacement program for almost a year now. Those 330s were aquired for the 10s eventual replacement. And as long as NW can operate the Dc9s for less than the cost of a newly aquired airplane, despite its fuel ineficiencies, the 9s are sticking around for their useful life.
azj is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 2:15 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
Originally Posted by milesrus
Does anybody have the fleet count. I am curious how many of the DC-9's and DC-10's are still in service. With the price of fuel surely they are headed for the boneyard?
On the contrary, I rather suspect that even with very high fuel costs it's cheaper to buy more fuel than it is to make payments on new aircraft.
SRQ Guy is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 3:49 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Santa Ana -SNA
Programs: NW Platinum Since The beginning of Platinum- NW Million Miler
Posts: 227
Originally Posted by SRQ Guy
On the contrary, I rather suspect that even with very high fuel costs it's cheaper to buy more fuel than it is to make payments on new aircraft.

JetBlue would probably beg to differ...........
kidvintage is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 4:04 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Plat, PC&HH Gold
Posts: 2,602
I'm not sure how JetBlue figures in here. They are focused primarily on relatively long-haul, high density routes that aren't appropriate for a little DC9.

Also, as a relatively new company they have to *acquire* new planes no matter what. They simply don't have any option other than lease or buy.
doglover is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 4:15 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
The numbers from YXUs link look fairly close....the exception being the 742 fleet. As of 10 May, there are 7 active 742s. There are rumors of a new cargo initiative coming down the pike soon, so some of those might show back up in the freighter column. A330-300s are now at 7. DC-10s at 22, with 2 to be parked this year. Total aircraft for mainline right now at 450.....expected to be at 454 at year end with retirements/new deliveries.

As an aside, Jet Blue apparently has very favorable delivery terms on their aircraft and are fairly much flying them for free right now.......when they have to actually start paying for their aircraft, Wall Street will get a surprise.....
doobierw is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 5:27 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Plat, PC&HH Gold
Posts: 2,602
Cool

The latest 10-Q has the fleet as of the end of March:

NW Fleet as of 3/31/2004
doglover is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 7:01 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Coppell, Texas
Posts: 1,014
It isn't only the high cost of fuel, but the maintenance and parts on planes built in the 60's and 70's. In addition the DC-10 requires 3 people up front.
milesrus is offline  
Old May 26, 2004, 11:50 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK - NWA Gold - AA Gold - Hilton Diamond - Marriott Gold
Programs: NW, CO, WN, HH
Posts: 409
I wanted to chime in and say thank you to all who have contributed to this topic. I love fleet information and logistics and hope to work with this full time, professionally someday.
So I'm completely fascinated with how airlines manage their fleets and am just beginning to learn the logistics and financial purposes behind it.
TopDawg4OU is offline  
Old May 27, 2004, 3:52 am
  #11  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, ex-BD Gold, SPG Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 2,040
Originally Posted by milesrus
It isn't only the high cost of fuel, but the maintenance and parts on planes built in the 60's and 70's. In addition the DC-10 requires 3 people up front.
Older planes are also entirely paid for and largely depreciated. As a result, the only costs associated with them would be the ongoing maintenance, crew and other operating costs. While these costs would be higher than for new aircraft, the economics apparently work out for NW. Acquiring new aircraft would entail some sort of financing (as we all know that airlines don't have the cash sitting around for these things), whether through some sort of secured borrowing, securitization or even straight debt or loans. I would expect that bringing new aircraft on-line also entails additional costs in terms of flight and ground crew training, maintenance bases, spare parts stores, etc. Again, the bean counters at NW have made a conscious decision that for them the older aircraft are more cost effective.
chalf is offline  
Old May 27, 2004, 6:43 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: RST
Programs: Delta Diamond; Hilton Diamond; Accor Gold
Posts: 4,839
Another real advantage to owning your fleet is the ability to store aircrafts quickly without real impact on cost. Nothing hurts like storing an aircraft you are leasing.

As stated above, Jetblue is not currently paying the real cost of the lease, that comes later. They are aggresive right now with new routes in order to build their revenue base. Will have to see how it works out in the future.
fromYXU is offline  
Old May 27, 2004, 7:06 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
Originally Posted by kidvintage
JetBlue would probably beg to differ...........
JetBlue doesn't have to make significant payments on their planes yet.
SRQ Guy is offline  
Old May 27, 2004, 8:15 am
  #14  
azj
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,576
NW has a no brainer business plan when it comes to their fleet. They only aquire new airplanes if they will instantly help the bottom line. That said, they do throrough research for the a/c that will fit their missions (330 vs 777). Then they choose the a/c and get financing for it. So, every plane is pre financed once it is delivered. In the case of retiring the 727s and DC10-40s - it make more financial sense to replace them with 319/320s and 752/753s than it did to keep flying them. So they will do the same thing with the 742s, DC9s and DC10-30s. When it becomes cheaper and more profitable to operate a newly aquired airplane, they will do so. Until then, they'll operate the current fleet.

IMO the 742 is a very dynamic airplane for NWA. They're all basically owned. So they can park them at a whim - a la SARS. They've also got NWA Cargo to play with - and we all know cargo is more lucrative than people. So if NWA can't make money stuffing butts in seats, they'll drop the cash to retrofit a cargo door and the other necessary a/c modifications and stuff boxes and palates on their decks. That is genius.

It's very interesting listening to the investor relations conference calls. One can learn alot and listen to how NWA does business compared to their competitors.


AZJ
azj is offline  
Old May 27, 2004, 8:57 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Programs: UA Premier 1K: PlAAtinum; DL SM, MM; Marriott Gold; CO Plat Emeritus; NW Plat Emeritus
Posts: 4,776
What I find interesting is the contrast between NW and the other majors -- NW seems much happier keeping planes much longer (the -9s, last ones with -10s). I don't mind at all, but wonder why the difference.
Alpha Golf is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.