Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > New York City
Reload this Page >

NYC No Longer Includes EWR

NYC No Longer Includes EWR

Old Sep 21, 22, 2:36 am
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 13,366
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist View Post
I'm guessing that customers were searching for NYC, didn't look at the results carefully, and later were upset/angry when they missed the flight or discovered after purchase that their tickets were from NJ and not NY.
Well thatís their fault then!

Plus this sort of code change wouldnít stop some people ending up in Sydney Nova Scotia instead of Australia or Grenada instead of Granada and vice versa.

Is AA for example going to start using the 24 hour clock because some people canít recognise the difference between am / pm? I donít think so.
UKtravelbear is online now  
Old Sep 21, 22, 6:08 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: LAX
Programs: UA
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by M60_to_LGA View Post
Apparently all the hubbub arose from one Lufthansa screenshot?
Of course, we know that the internet would never misinterpret anything.
angetenar is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 6:58 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 13,809
Let's give Newark some credit...

Originally Posted by MSPeconomist View Post
I'm guessing that customers were searching for NYC, didn't look at the results carefully, and later were upset/angry when they missed the flight or discovered after purchase that their tickets were from NJ and not NY.
Or...

Customers who were planning a romantic weekend getaway in Newark and thought they were getting 48h without ever having to leave the city limits were angry when their flight landed in Queens.

​​​​​​
sushanna1 likes this.
nerd is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 11:25 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 952
Now if only we could get the Giants/Jets to drop NY from their names...
Blumie and MisterBill like this.
Schnit is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 12:13 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 15,643
Originally Posted by Schnit View Post
Now if only we could get the Giants/Jets to drop NY from their names...
They'd want stadia built out over the Hudson or East River and funded by taxpayers.

David
DELee is online now  
Old Sep 21, 22, 12:14 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 15,643
Originally Posted by DELee View Post
One less thing for NYers to complain about.

David
Originally Posted by M60_to_LGA View Post
How is the number of people who can use any of the airports limited? The vast majority of tourists coming to NY will be going to Manhattan (or maybe north Brooklyn), which makes EWR a very easy trip on public transportation. Same for many business travelers coming to the city - it's much easier to get to/from Midtown or lower Manhattan by transit from EWR than from either of the Queens airports. If EWR is considered a different city, then what about BWI/DCA/IAD? Both BWI and IAD are way farther away from DC than EWR is from Manhattan.

As a NYC resident (and one who lives in Queens at that), this actually makes me angry.
Ooops. Too late. Never mind.

David
DELee is online now  
Old Sep 21, 22, 12:22 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 952
Originally Posted by DELee View Post
They'd want stadia built out over the Hudson or East River and funded by taxpayers.

David
MetLife stadium wasn't enough?
Schnit is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 12:24 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 15,643
Originally Posted by Schnit View Post
MetLife stadium wasn't enough?
Short of buying some corner of Manhattan for stadia, probably not.

David
DELee is online now  
Old Sep 21, 22, 12:37 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 952
Originally Posted by DELee View Post
Short of buying some corner of Manhattan for stadia, probably not.

David
how would that get the teams to drop NY from their names?
Schnit is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 12:41 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 15,643
Originally Posted by Schnit View Post
how would that get the teams to drop NY from their names?
It wouldn't. It would actually make their names accurate again.

David
DELee is online now  
Old Sep 21, 22, 4:31 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NYC
Programs: AA GLD, AC
Posts: 3,710
Originally Posted by mjm View Post
Thankfully this has been cleared up by the article posted by angetenar above. A change like this to accommodate people not knowing how to check the details of their reservation prior pushing the "Purchase" button did not make any sense at all actually. There are too many other similar codes that would be unaffected by such a change as the EWR one. The ability to price differently and set different airports as part of or excluded from a co-terminal definition makes eminently more sense.

Big sigh of relief.
Returning to this topic a day later, would any airline be stupid/evil enough to actually remove EWR from the NYC coterminal grouping? If I were facing a multi-hour delay to LGA and was refused the chance to change to a departing flight to EWR because "it's not the same destination," I'd be livid.

I have a hard time thinking a US air carrier would do that, but maybe foreign airlines? (As I guess was perhaps alluded to with regard to Lufthansa).
mjm likes this.
M60_to_LGA is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 4:54 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 25,639
Originally Posted by M60_to_LGA View Post
How is the number of people who can use any of the airports limited? The vast majority of tourists coming to NY will be going to Manhattan (or maybe north Brooklyn), which makes EWR a very easy trip on public transportation. Same for many business travelers coming to the city - it's much easier to get to/from Midtown or lower Manhattan by transit from EWR than from either of the Queens airports. If EWR is considered a different city, then what about BWI/DCA/IAD? Both BWI and IAD are way farther away from DC than EWR is from Manhattan.
Fair point, I was only thinking about NYC-originating pax and for that itís really just folks in Manhattan, Staten Island, and parts of the Bronx who should really be agnostic. (I suspect you may be an outlier among Queens residents )
ijgordon is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 4:56 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 25,639
Originally Posted by M60_to_LGA View Post
Returning to this topic a day later, would any airline be stupid/evil enough to actually remove EWR from the NYC coterminal grouping? If I were facing a multi-hour delay to LGA and was refused the chance to change to a departing flight to EWR because "it's not the same destination," I'd be livid.

I have a hard time thinking a US air carrier would do that, but maybe foreign airlines? (As I guess was perhaps alluded to with regard to Lufthansa).
I believe at least some of the domestic airlines have a distance-based rule for alternate destinations during IRROPS (and probably advance schedule changes). Like 250 or 300 miles. I donít know if LH would send you to BOS or PHL if EWR/JFK was closed or whatever but pretty sure at least DL/AA would.
ijgordon is offline  
Old Sep 21, 22, 4:59 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 25,639
Originally Posted by angetenar View Post
P-H-E-W!!!
ijgordon is offline  
Old Sep 22, 22, 7:57 am
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,284
As someone who is partially based in Manhattan, EWR is just as viable option as LGA or JFK. This is a negative simply because I now have to do two searches for flights rather than one. For me it is mostly pricing out TATL business class flights.

For example Air France is now flying at least once a day to EWR and it is cheaper than JFK. But it might or might not be cheaper than UA or to EWR or BA to JFK, etc. I can see it all today with one simple search to NYC.
stimpy is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread