FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   MilesBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milesbuzz-370/)
-   -   A MR to Baghdad? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milesbuzz/8203-mr-baghdad.html)

andrzej May 30, 2003 9:34 pm

A MR to Baghdad?
 
Any time now...

WASHINGTON — The Transportation Department (search) cleared U.S. passenger and cargo airlines on Friday to resume service to Iraq after sanctions prohibited those operations for nearly 13 years.


zvezda May 31, 2003 8:07 am

A lot has changed in 13 years. With the demise of PanAm and TWA as well as the advent of global alliances, I really can't imagine a US carrier adding Baghdad to their schedule. AFAIK, UA airlines don't even fly to CAI or IST with their own metal.

chalf May 31, 2003 8:08 am

At least several months ago, DL flew JFK-IST non-stop.

zvezda May 31, 2003 9:05 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by chalf:
At least several months ago, DL flew JFK-IST non-stop.</font>
You're right. It's DL72. I had thought that DL flew that and did a search on travelocity where it didn't turn up before my last post. Now I just found it at expedia, but it's still not showing up at travelocity. Anyway, Baghdad isn't Istanbul.

Markonen May 31, 2003 10:37 am

At least BA and Virgin see the Baghdad route as a likely cash cow, at least for the duration of the western-led rebuilding effort. One would think that the same logic would apply even more for nonstop US flights to Baghdad.

Then again, perhaps all the Halliburton execs get to travel on Air Force One...

zvezda May 31, 2003 10:44 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Markonen:
At least BA and Virgin see the Baghdad route as a likely cash cow, at least for the duration of the western-led rebuilding effort. One would think that the same logic would apply even more for nonstop US flights to Baghdad.</font>
Why? From almost any major city in the US, one can transfer at LHR. If Baghdad were served from, say, JFK, then from any other US city one would still need one transfer to get there.

Western Airlines May 31, 2003 11:09 am

As discussed in this thread, NW & KL applied to the U.S. DOT for permission to fly DTW-AMS-BGW.


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Northwest files application to fly to Iraq
Thursday, May 8, 2003
BY KARREN MILLS
ASSOCIATED PRESS

EAGAN, Minn. -- Northwest Airlines has asked the U.S. Department of Transportation for permission to begin flying from Detroit to Iraq, with a stop in Amsterdam.

Northwest spokesman Bill Mellon said Thursday that, if approved, the frequency of the flights would depend on demand. Northwest would serve the route with DC-10 aircraft, he said.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Northwest's alliance partner, also has applied for permission to fly into Baghdad, Mellon said. If both carriers are granted permission, he said Northwest and KLM would discuss how to best serve the market.</font>

zvezda May 31, 2003 11:40 am

AMS-BGW makes sense. Feeding AMS-BGW from DTW also makes sense. NW operated DTW-AMS-BGW makes sense especially if the AMS-BGW segment also carries the KL code. However, a KL operated AMS-BGW segment carrying the NW code would make even more sense and this is what I expect if both carriers receive permission to operate the route.

A hypothetical DTW-BGW nonstop would, IMO, make no sense.

[Edited for clarity.]

[This message has been edited by zvezda (edited 05-31-2003).]

Arcolaio99 May 31, 2003 7:41 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by zvezda:
AMS-BGW makes sense. Feeding AMS-BGW from DTW also makes sense. NW operated DTW-AMS-BGW makes sense especially if the AMS-BGW segment also carries the KL code. However, a KL operated AMS-BGW segment carrying the NW code would make even more sense and this is what I expect if both carriers receive permission to operate the route.

A hypothetical DTW-BGW nonstop would, IMO, make no sense.

[Edited for clarity.]

[This message has been edited by zvezda (edited 05-31-2003).]
</font>
DTW-BGW could be possible with the high Irai population and Arab population of the Detroit metro area.

SDF_Traveler Jun 1, 2003 5:58 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by zvezda:


A hypothetical DTW-BGW nonstop would, IMO, make no sense.

[Edited for clarity.]

[This message has been edited by zvezda (edited 05-31-2003).]
</font>
The Detroit area actually has the largest Iraqi exile population in the United States.

However, with the NW/KL hub in Amsterdam, it would only make sense for the flights to stop there to pick up additional passengers which may of originated at other NW/KL gateway cities (BOS, SEA, MEM, MSP, EWR, LAX, SFO, MEX, YYZ, etc) so that pax could connect onto BGW.

Lastly, I'm not sure if the DC10-30 would have the range to do DTW-BGW with a full load of pax and cargo. In addition to pax, I suspect there will be a heavy demand for cargo services into BGW as the country re-builds.

Best,

SDF_Traveler

------------------
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin

Arcolaio99 Jun 1, 2003 7:40 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by SDF_Traveler:
The Detroit area actually has the largest Iraqi exile population in the United States.

However, with the NW/KL hub in Amsterdam, it would only make sense for the flights to stop there to pick up additional passengers which may of originated at other NW/KL gateway cities (BOS, SEA, MEM, MSP, EWR, LAX, SFO, MEX, YYZ, etc) so that pax could connect onto BGW.

Lastly, I'm not sure if the DC10-30 would have the range to do DTW-BGW with a full load of pax and cargo. In addition to pax, I suspect there will be a heavy demand for cargo services into BGW as the country re-builds.

Best,

SDF_Traveler

</font>
Excellent points. No argument here against them. In time we will see.

zvezda Jun 2, 2003 12:43 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by SDF_Traveler:


However, with the NW/KL hub in Amsterdam, it would only make sense for the flights to stop there to pick up additional passengers which may of originated at other NW/KL gateway cities (BOS, SEA, MEM, MSP, EWR, LAX, SFO, MEX, YYZ, etc) so that pax could connect onto BGW.
</font>
Indeed. Not to mention connections at AMS from cities all over Europe.

kdinino Jun 2, 2003 9:13 am

One question: WHY?

zvezda Jun 2, 2003 10:00 am

Why what?

------------------
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

kdinino Jun 2, 2003 10:22 am

If your asking why back, then I guess I'm the crazy one.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.