Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Corporate Travel Cuts: Coporate Concern or Cynical Cost Cutting???

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Corporate Travel Cuts: Coporate Concern or Cynical Cost Cutting???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2001, 8:17 am
  #1  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,607
Corporate Travel Cuts: Coporate Concern or Cynical Cost Cutting???

I strongly suspect that many companies are instituting very restrictive travel policies NOT so much out of concern for employee safety and welfare in light of the events of 911, but as a disgustingly cynical cost cutting measure.

Now, this has not impacted me personally, as my CEO has actually ENCOURAGED us to get out on the road. But many, many folks I have spoken with are being grounded. But the FACT is that air travel is safer then ever, what with vigilent pax ready to thrash any would-be hijackers into a dead, bloody pulp.

With earnings down and many stocks hit hard, a few of us are theorizing that companies are using 911 as a convenient excuse to slash corporate travel budgets.

Comments?
kokonutz is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 8:30 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Central New Jersey
Programs: UA-Platimum 2 MM, HH-Gold, MR-Lifetime Gold, Hyatt-Discoverist
Posts: 6,238
I work for a major financial corporation based in the Southeast. Generally I travel domestically 3 or 4 times each month. Last week we all got a memo, stating that we should severly restrict any travel, and all travel must now be pre-approved by senior managment. Yes, somehow I do see this as more cost cutting than concern, but I also know that many welcome the chance to delay travel and spend more time at home with family and friends.
mauld is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 8:57 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CVG
Posts: 155
The company I work for had started curtailling travel rather strenuously back in late February to early March. When the FAA allowed planes to fly again, they strongly urged everyone to wait on travel until they could get everyone home who had been stranded during the grounding. Now they simply ask (as they already were) that travel be limited to business critical needs.

My company does tend to follow U.S. State Department guidelines for travel, so if military action results in recommendations from them, I'd expect to see my company adopt similar restrictions.
HollyHP is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 9:13 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison NJ; Watopia
Posts: 3,161
I work for a mid sized money manager in Manhattan. Among recent travel developments here:

1.) All travel must be business critical and be pre-approved by a managing director. Pre-approval used to be at the VP level.

2.) They are reminding everyone to adhere to a policy that has actually been in place for some time wherein no more than 2 officers may be on the same flight. If 3 or more officers are traveling, even if working on the same project/deal, then we have to split up.

I see #1 as a cost cutting move, and #2 are business continuity planning.

------------------
Who is John Galt?
------------------
767-322ETOPS is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 9:29 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,233
My company had already cut its travel to the minimum before this. In fact, we had cut it more than we should have so we moved it back up a bit. September 11th didn't change that.

What we have done is cut way back on pressure for individuals to travel. The least bit of personal discomfort is enough reason not to be asked to go. Enough of us are willing to travel today that this is not a problem.
Efrem is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 9:54 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Jersey Isle
Programs: BA Gold, BMI Gold, LH Senator, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 1,175
Budget cuts reduced travel until the new fiscal year which began July 1. After September 11, travel restrictions have returned to last fiscal year's restrictions. Everything still must be pre-approved and State Department warnings are strictly enforced.

I don't think necessarily we have cut back on travel as an excuse so much as there is not much budget. I think however the airlines have cut back with such massive layoffs. For example 20,000 employees laid off? That would seem like almost all of the employees entirely. We are 10,000+ employees in DC encompassing several blocks and we thought we were huge!



------------------
"Fly me to the moon and let me earn alot of miles."
worldbanker is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 11:10 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Columbia, SC
Programs: a little here, a little there
Posts: 1,443
My company (9000+ people internationally) also restricted travel to "business critical" and required division president approval. Effective 9/17, I think partly in response to government urgings to return to business, they dropped the new restrictions.

We also monitor the State Department's watch list.
johnndor is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 7:24 pm
  #8  
BIM
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Old Lyme,CT-BDL/PVD UA 2P, Delta SM, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 403
Koko:

Funny you mention this, as I just tonight made a similar comment to Mrs. BIM. My company has also instigated the "business-critical" limitation.

Thing is, that leans towards the assumption that travel before this period would not have had to be "business-critical", which to me doesn't make "business sense" for a company to have supported.

Some of my colleagues have argued that Trade shows, off-site training and the like are not that important, but to my line of work, these are critical activities.

Looks like the business to be in is video-conferencing.

BIM is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 10:51 pm
  #9  
In Memoriam, Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,879
Koko -

As you are, we are be encouraged to get back in the air. Travel restrictions that were in place before 9/11 have been lifted. Every day I get an email saying "Please resume travel and business as usual". Hmm. Works for me.
auh2o is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2001, 10:59 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Programs: AA PLT 2MM, LH SEN *, HH Gold
Posts: 3,075
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by 767-322ETOPS:
If 3 or more officers are traveling, even if working on the same project/deal, then we have to split up.</font>
Just curious, does this apply to flying only, or are you also not allowed to travel on the same bus, in the same taxi, etc. ?
Hagbard Viking is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2001, 9:16 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Southern California - UA1K, Delta GM, Starwood Gold, Hilton Gold, AA Platinum
Posts: 1,456
Well our company (which is a mid-sized consulting firm), could not have us not travel, since we work at client locations. Luckily, they did allow us to choose our "risk tolerance". I really have no problem with flying.. my problem would be with driving between LAX-MSP.
LAX 1K is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2001, 8:27 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hermitage, TN, USA
Posts: 320
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by kokonutz:
With earnings down and many stocks hit hard, a few of us are theorizing that companies are using 911 as a convenient excuse to slash corporate travel budgets.

Comments?
</font>

I would agree 100% I will not be traveling until June.
egarrett is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2001, 8:35 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hermitage, TN, USA
Posts: 320
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by auh2o:
Koko -

As you are, we are be encouraged to get back in the air. Travel restrictions that were in place before 9/11 have been lifted. Every day I get an email saying "Please resume travel and business as usual". Hmm. Works for me.
</font>
So do you have any openings? I would love to work for a company that would ask me to travel more.

egarrett is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.