|
Destinations!!!
IMHO, this whole thread is academic without destinations.
There are some obvious deciding destinations, such as DEN (UA) and DFW (AA) and a host of places with subtle differences. In my experience, AA flights tend to be more likely to be on time than UA flights, but that could just be my luck. With AA and the oneWorld alliance, you get one North American airline: AA. With UA and the * Alliance, you get three North American airlines: UA, US and AC. Also, keep in mind the recent US-HP merger which has added even more * Alliance routes on which you'll get Mileage Plus EQMs. Good luck on the new job and have fun getting those miles! Edited to add: Of course I forgot non-alliance partners, of which AA has (marginally) more than UA. AA: Alaska (non-stop service to SEA and ANC from ORD) Hawaiian UA: Aloha |
"UA's customer service is the best I've experienced. And I seem to get a lot of upgrades, but as they say, your experience may vary."
United give elite members 4 500 mile upgrade certificates for every 10k miles flown. In an ideal situation, that means that you can be upgraded 20% of the time. However, almost no flights are exactly 500 miles, so an 1100 mile flight is 3 certificates. Also, there are plenty of people who are able to expense $$ for upgrade coupons and so you'll liikely be in a long list of people to be upgraded. This means that even if you do want to use your coupons, you may not get to use them. The chances of you being able to redeem the coupons on the 15% or so of flights that you'll have them for is sketchy. Also, the coupons expire. So if you can't use them as your status isn't high enough then you won't get to use them at all. Realistically, you might get upgraded 10% ish or the time. I used to fly UA for 3 years at a silver/gold status. I've sat in coach plenty of times while there were seats open in FC. It is purely an insult to their flyers. AA have seemed alright to me, but I don't think they have the unlimited upgrades that CO and NW offer. Another thing to note is that if you get a lounge membership with UA or AA (as far as I know for AA anyways) you still have to pay the 'nominal fee' (aka full bar price +) and put up with the service with a snarl service from the people in the lounges. It's not good enough that you pay $300 for a lounge pass to a RCC, but you also end up paying $6 for a beer. Try complaining to UA about this. They're run by a different company and you have to actually write them a letter to complain. Rediculous. Personlly, I'd go with the non-direct flights on CO/NW and enjoy the benefits of a company who actually wants your business. |
Originally Posted by hotelexec
I live in Chicago and have gone back and forth between AA and UA over the years. Right now I am flying mostly AA. At elite levels, domestic upgrades are half the price, and are more likely to include meals. On international, AA lets you upgrade off even the cheapest fares, and the OneWorld round-the-world fares are much less restrictive than Star Alliance's.
UA is also using Ted and RJ's on a lot of flights from Chicago, even to cities like Dallas and Atlanta. The seating on these planes is not nearly as good as UA Economy Plus or AA's roomier seating. Ted is a cattle car with no first class - it was probably what drove me to AA most recently. UA international awards are a bit cheaper so if you're focused on that rather than immediate comfort, that would be a consideration. with the end of MRTC and the older fleet, at the lower flying levels, i think the alternative might be in the direction of United on the use of miles for award purposes, the *alliance and its opportunities seem greater than OneWorld |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:06 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.