![]() |
Quebec Bill 791: Regulations for rewards programs
(This development was originally pointed out at Rewards Canada blog)
Quebec has introduced Bill 791, Bill n°791 : An Act to amend the Consumer Protection Act in order to regulate rewards program contracts The bill introduces three new legislative requirements for loyalty programs that operate in Quebec. REWARDS PROGRAM CONTRACTS 187.6. Before entering into a rewards program contract, the merchant must inform the consumer of the conditions applicable to obtaining and using rewards points. 187.7. Subject to any applicable regulations, any stipulation of or amendment to the contract providing for an expiry date on the rewards points obtained by the consumer is prohibited. 187.8. Any stipulation providing that the merchant may retroactively change the value of the rewards points accumulated by the consumer is prohibited. And, there's more. The consumer protection department would become un régulateur des points... 4. Section 350 of the Act is amended by adding the following paragraph at the end: “(z.6) prescribing the rules respecting rewards program contracts and rewards points and exempting a merchant, on the conditions it determines, from the provisions relating to a rewards program contract.” That means Quebec would, in the coming months, draw up an entire set of its own new regulations. This appears to be a private members bill, introduced by an opposition member. Private members bills (for comedic effort, a very poor Google translation of "private members bill" was deliberately placed here earlier) don't have the force of the government, but a private members bill in Ontario helped force Air Miles to change its expiration policy. Fun times ahead. |
Here's a summary prepared by a third party about the matter.
http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/57700...on+Legislation |
So, rewards programs will have to inform the public how to collect and use the rewards. The rewards once collected won't expire, and the program you collected under can't be changed when you go to use the rewards.
Sounds fair to me. But, I'm not Canadian, so might I ask is this legislation necessary? Are people getting fleeced by rewards programs in Canada? |
This is gonna be a gong show. Eek.
|
Originally Posted by rickg523
(Post 28245564)
Are people getting fleeced by rewards programs in Canada?
|
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 28246017)
People in every country are. There are countless thread on FlyerTalk about people losing their miles and points due to inactivity, and regular devaluations.
The program operators know how to devalue the programs for customers, whether with or without changing the award chart pricing. |
Originally Posted by jerry305
(Post 28244802)
Private members bills (les factures des membres privés?)
Projets de lois émanant des députés. Google Translate has its uses, but this shows its limitations... *Takes off professional translator's hat* In theory, this bill sounds like a great idea. In practice, it sends shivers down my spine. I fear what happened with contests - Quebec tightened the rules regulating contests open to Quebec residents, so now 90% of all contests simply exclude Quebec residents rather than comply. Will rewards programs really want to give up this much flexibility? Aeroplan has enough at stake to want to comply or fight this, but other programs? Worst-case scenario is that Quebec residents will be excluded from all outside rewards schemes - airline, hotel, etc. This potentially could be disastrous for Quebec point-collectors if it passes. |
Originally Posted by Twickenham
(Post 28248535)
*Ahem*
Projets de lois émanant des députés. Google Translate has its uses, but this shows its limitations... *Takes off professional translator's hat* In theory, this bill sounds like a great idea. In practice, it sends shivers down my spine. I fear what happened with contests - Quebec tightened the rules regulating contests open to Quebec residents, so now 90% of all contests simply exclude Quebec residents rather than comply. Will rewards programs really want to give up this much flexibility? Aeroplan has enough at stake to want to comply or fight this, but other programs? Worst-case scenario is that Quebec residents will be excluded from all outside rewards schemes - airline, hotel, etc. This potentially could be disastrous for Quebec point-collectors if it passes. |
Changing the redemption rates would be prohibited, the alternative for devaluations would be to reduce the earn rates.
|
I see both sides: I don't trust airline management for a second - I generally find them to be about as ethical as cable companies and incapable of regulating themselves. But I also fear that regulation will simply accelerate a watering-down of rewards programs to the point where they are very simple (and not very rewarding) cashback schemes.
We (Flyertalkers) thrive in part because of the millions of people out there who don't pay attention to their miles. |
Originally Posted by rickg523
(Post 28245564)
So, rewards programs will have to inform the public how to collect and use the rewards. The rewards once collected won't expire, and the program you collected under can't be changed when you go to use the rewards.
Sounds fair to me. But, I'm not Canadian, so might I ask is this legislation necessary? Are people getting fleeced by rewards programs in Canada?
Originally Posted by Twickenham
(Post 28248535)
*Ahem*
Projets de lois émanant des députés. Google Translate has its uses, but this shows its limitations... *Takes off professional translator's hat* In theory, this bill sounds like a great idea. In practice, it sends shivers down my spine. I fear what happened with contests - Quebec tightened the rules regulating contests open to Quebec residents, so now 90% of all contests simply exclude Quebec residents rather than comply. Will rewards programs really want to give up this much flexibility? Aeroplan has enough at stake to want to comply or fight this, but other programs? Worst-case scenario is that Quebec residents will be excluded from all outside rewards schemes - airline, hotel, etc. This potentially could be disastrous for Quebec point-collectors if it passes. |
Originally Posted by Twickenham
(Post 28248535)
*Ahem*
Projets de lois émanant des députés. Google Translate has its uses, but this shows its limitations... *Takes off professional translator's hat* In theory, this bill sounds like a great idea. In practice, it sends shivers down my spine. I fear what happened with contests - Quebec tightened the rules regulating contests open to Quebec residents, so now 90% of all contests simply exclude Quebec residents rather than comply. Will rewards programs really want to give up this much flexibility? Aeroplan has enough at stake to want to comply or fight this, but other programs? Worst-case scenario is that Quebec residents will be excluded from all outside rewards schemes - airline, hotel, etc. This potentially could be disastrous for Quebec point-collectors if it passes. Aren't those the restrictions placed on programs by the Quebec regulation? If a program chooses to limit Quebecois from participating, doesn't that imply the program wants to be run that way? |
Originally Posted by N1120A
(Post 28252270)
Actually, a program that discriminates against a certain group of Canadians would almost certainly be found illegal. Further, Quebec represents the second largest provincial market in Canada, and is nearly twice the size of the next largest (B.C.). A program like Aeroplan simply cannot ignore Quebec in that respect.
To put this in perspective: what would you think of a government that outlawed stores from putting up the prices of their merchandise? It's exactly the same principle.
Originally Posted by rickg523
(Post 28252349)
But, do you really want to participate in programs that hide how you can collect or redeem awards, that expire points you rightfully collected, and can change the rules mid-stream?
Aren't those the restrictions placed on programs by the Quebec regulation? If a program chooses to limit Quebecois from participating, doesn't that imply the program wants to be run that way? I'll give you points expiry; I personally like the activity-to-keep-points-from-expiring rules, but certainly a regulation that would outlaw points expiry I think would be implementable, without risking companies' pulling out. |
Originally Posted by Twickenham
(Post 28252363)
I'm not worried about Aeroplan - like I said, they have too much at stake to just ditch Quebec. I'm worried about all the non-Canadian based programs - Marriott/SPG, IHG, British Airways, Accor, just to name those I personally have points with. Do you honestly think any of them will care one whit about one province of a small market (for them)? They'll just follow what apparently Alaska Airlines has already done, which is pull out of Quebec. This could be totally disastrous for us Quebec-based points accumulators.
To put this in perspective: what would you think of a government that outlawed stores from putting up the prices of their merchandise? It's exactly the same principle. I'm not sure any program actively hides collection or redemption of awards. Now, I will put the caveat of AE's ridiculous website making it highly difficult to redeem awards, but the well-informed have workarounds. However, this particular regulation does nothing to counter that. I'll give you points expiry; I personally like the activity-to-keep-points-from-expiring rules, but certainly a regulation that would outlaw points expiry I think would be implementable, without risking companies' pulling out. |
Originally Posted by rickg523
(Post 28252349)
If a program chooses to limit Quebecois from participating, doesn't that imply the program wants to be run that way?
FWIW, I never bother to participate in a Canadian sweepstake that excludes Québec residents; it's a good indication that it is probably a fake draw and that no prizes will ever be distributed/won... . |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.