|
Originally Posted by Stoughton
(Post 15536952)
Interesting. I hope nobody out there has the same name as our pets
|
Originally Posted by ooodaveb
(Post 15544597)
Funny you mention that! The company I consulted for had the same issue and the software makers (third party) ended up having a "PET" flag in the database to prevent it from "linking".
|
Originally Posted by ArizonaGuy
(Post 15544404)
Someone recently posted a link to an article that pertained to creditors and how they don't need your SSN. Between the reams of data including your name, DOB, current and previous addresses plus other random bits of info it's a simple task to find a person. The point was that you aren't off the hook from a bill collector just because they don't have your magic 9 digit number.
|
Originally Posted by Tailgater
(Post 15554581)
This seems hard to believe. A primary cardholder, then, could just list anybody's name and address w/o even the other person aware of being added as an "authorized" user.
|
Originally Posted by FlyingBoat
(Post 15555288)
I suppose the could, but could then get in trouble. I believe the terms say the authorized user needs to agree to have a card.
And still the full responsibilty for the card goes to the primary card holder not the authorized user so if authorized user run up the card then primary user is responsible for paying that card not the authorized user. I dont see any benefit in adding the user without their consent. |
Originally Posted by FlyingBoat
(Post 15555288)
I suppose the could, but could then get in trouble. I believe the terms say the authorized user needs to agree to have a card.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:36 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.