Can the NW/TPG deal close in the current environment?
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,376
Can the NW/TPG deal close in the current environment?
This could get interesting. In case you haven't noticed, airline stock prices have almost halved since the TPG deal was announced (due to oil and economic worries). NW and TPG were already paying what looked like a huge premium. Now they would be several hundred million underwater if they close the deal. I wonder what the break-up fee is.
BTW, there's some precedent for airlines backing out of deals after the economics turned. UA essentially "gave up" on their bid for US a few years ago when it no longer looked like a smart deal.
BTW, there's some precedent for airlines backing out of deals after the economics turned. UA essentially "gave up" on their bid for US a few years ago when it no longer looked like a smart deal.
#2
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MKE
Programs: Midwest Miles, AirTran A+ Rewards
Posts: 1,445
This could get interesting. In case you haven't noticed, airline stock prices have almost halved since the TPG deal was announced (due to oil and economic worries). NW and TPG were already paying what looked like a huge premium. Now they would be several hundred million underwater if they close the deal. I wonder what the break-up fee is.
BTW, there's some precedent for airlines backing out of deals after the economics turned. UA essentially "gave up" on their bid for US a few years ago when it no longer looked like a smart deal.
BTW, there's some precedent for airlines backing out of deals after the economics turned. UA essentially "gave up" on their bid for US a few years ago when it no longer looked like a smart deal.
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 56,888
From the merger agreement at p. 9 of Exhibit A:
“Termination Fee” means $13,541,000.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...0917/exh21.htm
I'm not sure that this is what is normally considered the "break-up fee", but my guess (w/o studying the contract) is that this is the price for walking away from the deal. If it is, that's pretty small compared to the $400m+ price of the deal. Perhaps the $14.22 share price (compared to $17 tender offer) is a reflection of both potential DOJ objections and the possibility the buyers might back out of the deal.
“Termination Fee” means $13,541,000.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...0917/exh21.htm
I'm not sure that this is what is normally considered the "break-up fee", but my guess (w/o studying the contract) is that this is the price for walking away from the deal. If it is, that's pretty small compared to the $400m+ price of the deal. Perhaps the $14.22 share price (compared to $17 tender offer) is a reflection of both potential DOJ objections and the possibility the buyers might back out of the deal.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
The other thing to remember about the NWA/TPG deal is that neither party has to seek outside financing for the deal. AirTran, on the other hand, had provisions in their proposed buy-out agreement that allowed them to walk away from the deal if they were unable to secure financing at attractive terms.
#6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MKE
Programs: Midwest Miles, AirTran A+ Rewards
Posts: 1,445
$17 per share.
The other thing to remember about the NWA/TPG deal is that neither party has to seek outside financing for the deal. AirTran, on the other hand, had provisions in their proposed buy-out agreement that allowed them to walk away from the deal if they were unable to secure financing at attractive terms.
The other thing to remember about the NWA/TPG deal is that neither party has to seek outside financing for the deal. AirTran, on the other hand, had provisions in their proposed buy-out agreement that allowed them to walk away from the deal if they were unable to secure financing at attractive terms.
#7
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
$17 per share.
The other thing to remember about the NWA/TPG deal is that neither party has to seek outside financing for the deal. AirTran, on the other hand, had provisions in their proposed buy-out agreement that allowed them to walk away from the deal if they were unable to secure financing at attractive terms.
The other thing to remember about the NWA/TPG deal is that neither party has to seek outside financing for the deal. AirTran, on the other hand, had provisions in their proposed buy-out agreement that allowed them to walk away from the deal if they were unable to secure financing at attractive terms.
#8
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SLC
Programs: DL PM, Hilton/Marriott Gold
Posts: 971
My understanding is that TPG is paying the "fair value" for Midwest, and NW is paying the premium. For NW, this is a great deal because 1) they are keeping Airtran out of MKE (for now) and 2) The codeshare agreement will bring more passengers their way.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,376
Wow, it if was really possible for TPG/NW to walk for $13 million, I'd bet they would. From an investment perspective, if we could confirm that, it might make for a good short on MEH stock. I'd figure they're otherwise $200 million in the hole on this deal right now (conservatively).
It's interesting that AAI stock has completely collapsed here (I used to be an AAI shareholder, but I sold almost all my shares before the complete collapse. But don't think I'm so brilliant -- I'm losing plenty of money on my LCC shares bought in the mid-teens!). AAI seems to be doing the best of any of the US carriers right now -- their load factors and yields are terrific. They might still want MEH -- but I'm certain they wouldn't be willing to pay $17/share in the current environment.
As I said, this will be very interesting. And if TPG abandons MEH, could they even survive? They seem to have made a mess of their business trying to avoid AAI, and the fuel costs have to be really hurting them.
It's interesting that AAI stock has completely collapsed here (I used to be an AAI shareholder, but I sold almost all my shares before the complete collapse. But don't think I'm so brilliant -- I'm losing plenty of money on my LCC shares bought in the mid-teens!). AAI seems to be doing the best of any of the US carriers right now -- their load factors and yields are terrific. They might still want MEH -- but I'm certain they wouldn't be willing to pay $17/share in the current environment.
As I said, this will be very interesting. And if TPG abandons MEH, could they even survive? They seem to have made a mess of their business trying to avoid AAI, and the fuel costs have to be really hurting them.
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 56,888
I took a closer look at the agreement (link above) and your understanding appears to be correct. The termination fee is what the company would pay the purchasers. It's not clear to me that TPG/NWA has any right to walk away, for any price.
#12
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
This could get interesting. In case you haven't noticed, airline stock prices have almost halved since the TPG deal was announced (due to oil and economic worries). NW and TPG were already paying what looked like a huge premium. Now they would be several hundred million underwater if they close the deal. I wonder what the break-up fee is.
BTW, there's some precedent for airlines backing out of deals after the economics turned. UA essentially "gave up" on their bid for US a few years ago when it no longer looked like a smart deal.
BTW, there's some precedent for airlines backing out of deals after the economics turned. UA essentially "gave up" on their bid for US a few years ago when it no longer looked like a smart deal.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: YX
Posts: 170
On August 16, 2007, a "definitive merger agreement" was signed by the three parties involved. Consequently, I don't think anyone is going to be walking away from anything.
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 56,888
You're probably right in your conclusion, but signing a such an agreement is no assurance at all that it will close. It appears that there is no break-up fee or damages cap protecting TPG/NWA. If that's true (and I'm not sure about that), then the lack of such provision is why I'd agree with your conclusion, not merely the fact that they signed a "definitive merger agreement". Such agreements are coming unglued left and right these days.