2-Class Reconfiguration and May Travel
#16
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
Huh? As a frequent WN flyer and LUV shareholder, this is news to me. You seem to be confusing their announcment that they are slowing their growth with something else. WN still plans on growing 4-5% in 2008 after reducing the target twice in 2007.
Also, although I'm not convinced Virgin America's business model is viable myself, the fact that they haven't made a profit yet is meaningless in assessing their long-term viability, they likely had no intention of turning a profit for a few years.
Also, although I'm not convinced Virgin America's business model is viable myself, the fact that they haven't made a profit yet is meaningless in assessing their long-term viability, they likely had no intention of turning a profit for a few years.
#17
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
In exchange for slots at SNA, Midwest agreed to operate 2 flights per day on weekdays. Service commenced in October 2003. While operating this schedule, monthly loads never surpassed 70% and were often in the high 40%/low 50% range. It's doubtful they were making much, if any, money on those flights. In November 2004, Midwest dropped the frequency to 1x daily and used the extra aircraft time to launch MCI-MSY and MCI-FLL. They SNA airport commission gave Midwest until May 1, 2005 to return to 2 daily flights or they would be forced to discontinue service. The last Midwest flight into SNA took place on April 30, 205.
During 2004, Midwest surveyed passengers who used the SNA service. Many indicated that they preferred going to LAX but went to SNA because of Midwest. That's why Midwest decided to challenge Southwest on MCI-LAX, and the route has performed well ever since.
#18
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: YX
Posts: 170
The several trips I made MCI-SNA were reasonably full also. Now that the code share with NWA has begun I doubt we would ever see a return to SNA.