Onboard loans (T100s) for September
Here are the onboard loads for Midwest and select Milwaukee competitors for the month of September. Remember, as always, that onboard loads are only half the picture when trying to guess relative performance, and say little or nothing about yield and traffic composition.
Midwest 93.4% ….. MKE ….. LAS 89.2% ….. MCI ….. SEA 87.6% ….. MKE ….. DEN 87.2% ….. MKE ….. PHX 84.3% ….. MCI ….. SFO 83.8% ….. MKE ….. LAX 83.5% ….. MKE ….. TPA 83.2% ….. MCI ….. BOS 82.9% ….. MKE ….. BOS 82.3% ….. MKE ….. LGA 81.3% ….. MKE ….. PHL 78.4% ….. MCI ….. LGA 77.9% ….. OMA ….. DCA 76.6% ….. MKE ….. MCO 76.5% ….. MKE ….. DCA 75.6% ….. MCI ….. LAX 74.7% ….. MKE ….. MSP 74.3% ….. MCI ….. DCA 71.4% ….. MKE ….. EWR 67.6% ….. MKE ….. MSN 67.4% ….. MKE ….. ATL 66.7% ….. MKE ….. DFW 64.9% ….. MKE ….. GRB 63.9% ….. MKE ….. IND 63.7% ….. MKE ….. MCI 63.6% ….. MKE ….. OMA 62.6% ….. MKE ….. GRR 58.1% ….. MKE ….. PIT 56.4% ….. MKE ….. BNA 56.3% ….. MKE ….. ATW 54.8% ….. MKE ….. CLE 53.6% ….. MKE ….. DSM 49.3% ….. MKE ….. CMH 48.7% ….. MKE ….. SDF 45.8% ….. MKE ….. DAY 43.6% ….. MKE ….. FNT AirTran 93.4% ….. MKE ….. SEA 92.1% ….. MKE ….. LAS 91.4% ….. MKE ….. SFO 82.1% ….. MKE ….. TPA 79.8% ….. MKE ….. DEN 75.2% ….. MKE ….. LAX 72.9% ….. MKE ….. MCO 70.1% ….. MKE ….. BWI 68.2% ….. MKE ….. LGA 67.4% ….. MKE ….. ATL 64.3% ….. MKE ….. STL 62.7% ….. MKE ….. MSP 60.5% ….. MKE ….. DCA 56.9% ….. MKE ….. BOS Frontier 91.1% ….. MKE ….. DEN A few notes: (a) In many markets, the summer peak has definitely passed. (b) MKE-LAX ended on NW this month, so both Midwest and AirTran likely benefitted form that and posted good loads. However it will be interesting to see subsequent months because traffic has definitely dminished since fall to LAX. In the current period...the lull between Thanksgiving and Christmas...AirTran pulled their normal morning MKE-LAX nonstop for apparent lack of demand, and their evening MKE-LAX nonstop is sometimes going out with only a few dozen passengers from what I'm hearing. And Midwest's daily morning MKE-LAX nonstop (in spite of no morning nonstop competition in this period) often carries loads that an E190 could hold. Now things will turn around sharply around 12/18 for a couple of weeks. But early December is a preview of the lull betwen New Year's and spring break. Overcapacity seems to be the name of the game, and one wonders if there will be more capacity pulls, or empty planes, or both. (c) The west coasd routes which AirTran cut last fall, especially the monopolies to SFO and SEA, flew rather full this September. Boston didn't do as well. Curious that usually-emptier STL actually ran fuller than MSP in the month. (d) As I did with August's numbers, I pulled out some "thru" numbers for AirTran. The T100's include a section telling the number of people flying between city pairs without a change of planes, so we can see specifically on those flights how many passengers flew (for example) LAX-MKE-LGA just on the thru flights. It doesn't tell us how many people connected in those sorts of markets. Here are some September thru passenger numbers for routings via their MKE operation, with # being average thru passengers per flight. MSP-(MKE)-BOS ..... 31 average thru passenges per flight MSP-(MKE)-LGA ..... 10 average thru passengers per flight MSP-(MKE)-DCA ..... 28 average thru passengers per flight LGA-(MKE)-MSP ..... 32 average thru passengers per flight BWI-(MKE)-MSP ..... 7 average thru passengers per flight STL-(MKE)-DCA ..... 7 average thru passengers per flight STL-(MKE)-LGA ..... 9 average thru passengers per flight DCA-(MKE)-STL ..... 9 average thru passengers per flight MKE-(STL)-MCO ..... 11 average thru passengers per flight DCA-(MKE)-SEA ..... 16 average thru passengers per flight SEA-(MKE)-DCA ..... 11 average thru passengers per flight SFO-(MKE)-MCO ..... 13 average thru passengers per flight BOS-(MKE)-SFO ..... 3 average thru passengers per flight DCA-(MKE)-LAX ..... 8 average thru passengers per flight LAX-(MKE)-LGA ..... 21 average thru passengers per flight Remember, these are just the the passengers on flights operated as "thru" flights with no change of plane / change of flight number. In addition to these thru passengers there is an unspecified number of connecting passengers we can't see from these monthly stats. Midwest runs few "thru" flights, and for September Republic did not report them as "thru" so we don't have similar numbers for Midwest. |
Originally Posted by knope2001
(Post 12980230)
(b) MKE-LAX ended on NW this month, so both Midwest and AirTran likely benefitted form that and posted good loads. However it will be interesting to see subsequent months because traffic has definitely dminished since fall to LAX. In the current period...the lull between Thanksgiving and Christmas...AirTran pulled their normal morning MKE-LAX nonstop for apparent lack of demand, and their evening MKE-LAX nonstop is sometimes going out with only a few dozen passengers from what I'm hearing. And Midwest's daily morning MKE-LAX nonstop (in spite of no morning nonstop competition in this period) often carries loads that an E190 could hold. Now things will turn around sharply around 12/18 for a couple of weeks. But early December is a preview of the lull betwen New Year's and spring break. Overcapacity seems to be the name of the game, and one wonders if there will be more capacity pulls, or empty planes, or both.
|
Originally Posted by newsmanhoss
(Post 12980389)
Yes, I am particularly interested in AirTran's MKE-LAX performance. I am booked on FL for that route in early February, so I hope it survives the long, cold winter. I was originally booked on NW for that trip, but canceled it after the NW nonstop was dropped. Hopefully, my FL replacement isn't up the creek, too.
Returning the typically slow weekend after Thanksgiving had 50 pax on board. |
I've finally had some time to post some thoughts on these numbers.
Looking at the East Coast business destinations, I'm somewhat surprised to see just how little local traffic AirTran is carrying on these routes. It also seems that MSP is a critical link for LGA and DCA in particular. Without all of those thru and connecting passengers from the twin cities, the loads would have been much, much lower. I'm curious to see who performs better on MKE-BWI this winter. Also, it's somewhat interesting to see how weak MKE-ATL has been for Midwest this year despite the capacity reduction. I've been wondering about the status of this route for a long-time, especially since there's little difference in fare between Midwest and AirtRan. Thanks as usual for posting these stats ^ |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:13 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.