![]() |
Dubai doing ok
https://skift.com/2020/08/11/our-col...ource=hs_emailso does this mean emirates is doing ok as well ? |
Yes .
|
got a few friends living over in Dubai atm as midwives, judging by their Instagram pages Dubai's party scene is picking up again
|
Originally Posted by iruntings
(Post 32609337)
got a few friends living over in Dubai atm as midwives, judging by their Instagram pages Dubai's party scene is picking up again
|
Originally Posted by csdf
(Post 32625459)
...as are the number of cases.
It's all about age & health status. |
There is a correlation. You can't die from coronavirus unless you catch it.
|
Originally Posted by OZFLYER86
(Post 32625476)
cases don't mean deaths. There's no correlation.
Death is always a possible outcome for those contracting C-19. There's your correlation. There's a raft of other outcomes involving complications of varying degrees of misery and duration. |
Originally Posted by csdf
(Post 32625525)
There is a correlation. You can't die from coronavirus unless you catch it.
or you could have 1 case in a 90 yo who dies. Sweden seems to have taken the correct path. |
Yes really. Point me to someone who died of covid19 without catching SARS-COV-2. I would love to hear about this miracle of statistical impossibility.
|
Originally Posted by csdf
(Post 32625769)
Yes really. Point me to someone who died of covid19 without catching SARS-COV-2. I would love to hear about this miracle of statistical impossibility.
|
You know, words have meaning. The term "correlation" has a meaning that is very well defined. You said "cases don't mean deaths. There's no correlation.". This is obviously false, as we can see by looking for a time before there were any cases and seeing that, lo, there were also no deaths.
What I think you're trying to say is that you think covid19 infections and deaths are not linearly correlated. That is true, but I don't think anyone ever has ever claimed that they were. What is is however true is that covid19 infections and deaths are positively correlated. Which means that deaths tend to go up when cases go up, and go down when cases go down. The amount of correlation varies for all sorts of factors (demographics, medical care etc). |
Originally Posted by OZFLYER86
(Post 32625617)
not really. You could have a million cases in young healthy people & no deaths.
or you could have 1 case in a 90 yo who dies. The silliness of this type of reasoning is that it ignores the inevitable transmission among the young & fit ...... and thence to young & not-so-fit, and to the not so young. The consequence is a new spike in infections, and some weeks' later, in deaths. |
Originally Posted by OZFLYER86
(Post 32625617)
not really. You could have a million cases in young healthy people & no deaths.
(https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/29/s...-athletes.html) "Another complication that Galiatsatos considered particularly concerning to athletes, and one that experts were still trying to wrap their heads around, was the high incidence of blood clots that doctors were seeing in coronavirus patients." |
Originally Posted by csdf
(Post 32627847)
You know, words have meaning. The term "correlation" has a meaning that is very well defined...
Originally Posted by csdf
(Post 32627847)
What I think you're trying to say is that you think covid19 infections and deaths are not linearly correlated.
|
Originally Posted by mecabq
(Post 32701501)
Sorry to be pedantic, but the definition of "correlation" means a linear relationship. Correlation in its widest sense simply implies an association. And while in statistics the definition of the term certainly focuses almost exclusively on linear relationships, it did not prevent Spearman from developing a rank correlation coefficient to bring non-linear associations into the fold. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:07 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.