Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Marriott | Marriott Bonvoy
Reload this Page >

Starwood/Marriott Data Breach 500 Million Guests affected, Marriott fined £18.4m

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Nov 30, 2018, 5:05 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: MasterGeek
From Starwood Lurker team :
Please visit  info.starwoodhotels.com  for more information about this incident, available resources and steps you can take.

Marriott has announced a massive breach of data belonging to 500 million guests who stayed at hotel brands including W, Sheraton, and Westin.
Marriott announced on Friday that it had "taken measures to investigate and address a data security incident" that stemmed from its Starwood guest authorization database.
The company said it believes that around 500 million people's information was accessed, including an unspecified number who had their credit card details taken. It affects customers who made bookings on or before September 10, 2018.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/marriott-data-breach-500-million-guests-affected-2018-11?r=US&IR=T
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/marriott-announces-starwood-guest-reservation-database-security-incident-300758155.html

You can enroll in the "identity" monitoring service provided by Marriott due to this breach here, it cannot be called "credit monitoring" because it doesn't provide access to viewing credit bureau report data (as held by Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) nor notifications when credit report data changes :
https://answers.kroll.com/us/index.html
Print Wikipost

Starwood/Marriott Data Breach 500 Million Guests affected, Marriott fined £18.4m

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2018, 10:37 pm
  #346  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
The more this mistake costs Starriott, the less likely they are to make a similar mistake in the future if it can be avoided by being more careful or spending more resources on IT. It really doesn't matter who benefits from the payment of fines, penalties, and other costs. It's the incentives that matter.
Yes. And as with US criminal prosecutions, some are done to make an example for others, because examples of how serious something may be taken is part and parcel of the point of incentives/disincentives amongst other things.

An incentive is an incentive and a disincentive is a disincentive most profoundly when the potential outcomes are recognized and appreciated as such in advance of making a relevant decision and acting upon it. But a proverbial slap on the wrist as the default for well-heeled corporations is an incentive of sort, an incentive not to change ways too much.

Last edited by GUWonder; Dec 4, 2018 at 10:57 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2018, 10:55 pm
  #347  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by stimpy
Not true anymore. First of all there are less and less people who are that clueless. Especially in industrialized nations. Even children are taught about this in schools now. Secondly the technology companies have rolled out many tools and features to prevent the less technically-minded from shooting themselves in the foot. Example: how is hovering your mouse over a link in an email considered "jumping through additional hoops"?
Isn’t most clicking on links in industrialized countries done without a mouse yet?

Even as a larger proportion of people are aware of the dangers of clicking on questionable links, and even as more technology tools exist to try to save people from themselves when it comes to clicking onto questionable links, I have no doubt that there are a huge proportion of “morons” clicking on questionable things and it’s why this is such a frequently used vector of hacking done by state actors and by non-state actors, many of which are aimed at people who are more likely to know better than the average person on say the streets of Dhaka. As more and more “morons” have gotten online, more and more have become at risk in ways that weren’t the case when say only 5% or less of people were using the internet on a daily basis.

The breached Marriott data about government/military rate use in reservations would be rather prime material for some state actors and even some non-state actors in the business of selling stolen data and even state actor hacking tools. Because many such persons will use their personal devices and click on things anyway when it appears to be rather routine.

I have little to zero faith in school education for young kids changing much of anything to avoid device/data breaches — young children tend to be at least as impulsive as ever in some ways and more in other ways. The declining value they place in privacy doesn’t inspire confidence about what their education on online use means for avoiding data/device breaches. But hopefully I’ll be wrong about this.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2018, 11:48 pm
  #348  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,616
Originally Posted by stimpy
Easy to create such an email. But in this day and age it would take a moron to blindly trust the sender.
There are a lot of "morons" in my office. One (a millennial) got taken for $6k this year ($3k x2) by blindly trusting every e-mail that came in her inbox. She also insisted on installing a version of MS Office we don't officially support. I don't think there's a single link in an e-mail she hasn't clicked or an attachment she hasn't opened. We ended up putting some serious pressure on her bank to get her money back and after ~2 months, she was made whole. I think (hope?) she's learned her lesson.

Originally Posted by MasterGeek
Is Marriott going to provide material compensation to regain consumer confidence and repair the same the company brought upon themselves for their careless mishandling of guest personal information? A few dozen grand Marriott point or free night certificates will do.
And just how would they do that? This is the same Marriott which still can't provide a working, stable website in 2018, can't run a promotion (29 Ways to Fail), can't properly credit stays, and still believes FAX is a thing. Even if they were to issue 10,000 points to everyone, what are the chances that it'd actually end up in our accounts? Still waiting for the 29 Ways points...
remymartin likes this.
KRSW is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2018, 11:55 pm
  #349  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,339
Originally Posted by KRSW
There are a lot of "morons" in my office. One (a millennial) got taken for $6k this year ($3k x2) by blindly trusting every e-mail that came in her inbox. She also insisted on installing a version of MS Office we don't officially support. I don't think there's a single link in an e-mail she hasn't clicked or an attachment she hasn't opened. We ended up putting some serious pressure on her bank to get her money back and after ~2 months, she was made whole. I think (hope?) she's learned her lesson.
That kind of person can be conned by non-technical means as well. The Marriott's of the world can't be held to blame these cases. You just hope, as you noted, that experience teaches them a lesson.
stimpy is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 12:13 am
  #350  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,616
@stimpy: I 100% agree with you. In a previous life, many, many, many moons ago (and well past the Statute of Limitations), I was well into hacking & social engineering.
She would be the ideal type of target. She thinks she's far smarter than she is, and worse, she doesn't know what she doesn't know.
KRSW is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 1:58 am
  #351  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by stimpy
That kind of person can be conned by non-technical means as well.
Often yes, but there's definitely something about the use of technical means that enable hacking and conning in a way that was more difficult and took way more time and effort before than it does now. And while the younger folks may tend to be way more distrusting of institutions than some older generations, they seem no less susceptible to being subjected to online exploitation than those a generation or two older; and offline exploitation avoidance is probably no better now than a decade or two ago.

And this kind of data leak-- as with this Marriott data breach in particular -- has the potential to enable conning people (including even Marriott's own employees under some circumstances) more easily, both by non-technical means and by technical means.

I'm sure of one thing: the most powerful state actors find technical tools to have become increasingly more efficient tools to access and exploit larger number of targets than non-technical tools. It's probably not all that different for criminals of sorts, which is why the most lucrative criminal conning of people seems to have gone online in such a big way. Even organized crime has shifted in part with online strategies and tactics to more efficiently make criminal gains -- which explains in some part more technical hacking efforts.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 2:42 am
  #352  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,339
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I'm sure of one thing: the most powerful state actors find technical tools to have become increasingly more efficient tools to access and exploit larger number of targets than non-technical tools. It's probably not all that different for criminals of sorts, which is why the most lucrative criminal conning of people seems to have gone online in such a big way. Even organized crime has shifted in part with online strategies and tactics to more efficiently make criminal gains -- which explains in some part more technical hacking efforts.
Well yes. Everything can be made more efficient with the Internet and modern tools. Both honest and criminal activities benefit. But the fundamental nature of a confidence game hasn't changed in centuries.

I always like the old saying, You Can't Cheat an Honest Man.
stimpy is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 3:16 am
  #353  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by stimpy
Well yes. Everything can be made more efficient with the Internet and modern tools. Both honest and criminal activities benefit. But the fundamental nature of a confidence game hasn't changed in centuries.

I always like the old saying, You Can't Cheat an Honest Man.
Sure, but an honest man may be cheated until and unless the honest man has nothing of which to be cheated. Surely we aren't saying that Marriott customers hit by Marriott data breaches aren't all honest and thus all the Marriott customers deserve what they get until and unless they have no more to give?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 3:39 am
  #354  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,339
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Sure, but an honest man may be cheated until and unless the honest man has nothing of which to be cheated. Surely we aren't saying that Marriott customers hit by Marriott data breaches aren't all honest and thus all the Marriott customers deserve what they get until and unless they have no more to give?
No. None of the Marriott customers have lost anything yet (as far as has been publicly divulged). The day that someone falls for a phishing scam that utilizes the data stolen from Marriott/Starwood, is the day you can ask that person why did you fall for it? What did you think you would gain by clicking on the link or speaking to a phony rep. That's the point of the "can't cheat an honest man" argument. And Marriott should not be blamed for that. Marriott/Starwood are clearly at fault for not adequately protecting customer data. But if some sucker gets fooled into a scam that utilizes that data, it's the fault of the individual who gets scammed.

But the other angle is in the United States where a criminal could successfully open a line of credit in the name of one of Marriott's customers. That's back on Marriott. And of course the laws of the USA and the 50 states that effectively allow a criminal to steal someones identity and get credit in that name.
stimpy is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 3:49 am
  #355  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by stimpy
No. None of the Marriott customers have lost anything yet (as far as has been publicly divulged). The day that someone falls for a phishing scam that utilizes the data stolen from Marriott/Starwood, is the day you can ask that person why did you fall for it? What did you think you would gain by clicking on the link or speaking to a phony rep. That's the point of the "can't cheat an honest man" argument. And Marriott should not be blamed for that. Marriott/Starwood are clearly at fault for not adequately protecting customer data. But if some sucker gets fooled into a scam that utilizes that data, it's the fault of the individual who gets scammed.

But the other angle is in the United States where a criminal could successfully open a line of credit in the name of one of Marriott's customers. That's back on Marriott. And of course the laws of the USA and the 50 states that effectively allow a criminal to steal someones identity and get credit in that name.
The first paragraph above includes things that seem a lot like victim-blaming. Blaming victims of crime for being a victim of criminals seems to just add insult to injury. Better to blame the criminals and then those who provided the tool(s) that the tool-supplier knew could be used by the criminals and would be once accessed by such.

Criminals getting identity and credit in the name of others isn't all that difficult to do outside the US either. It's very easy to pull off in at various parts of Europe, including in parts of the Schengen area that are seen as being more of a nanny-state than most of the rest of the EU.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 3:57 am
  #356  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,339
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The first paragraph above includes things that seem a lot like victim-blaming. Blaming victims of crime for being a victim of criminals seems to just add insult to injury. Better to blame the criminals and then those who provided the tool(s) that the tool-supplier knew could be used by the criminals and would be once accessed by such.
That's the society we live in. If you leave the door to your home wide open to the street, or leave the keys to your car in the ignition, then society blames the victim rather than the criminal.
stimpy is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 4:22 am
  #357  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by stimpy
That's the society we live in. If you leave the door to your home wide open to the street, or leave the keys to your car in the ignition, then society blames the victim rather than the criminal.
I don't know about that. I have homes where I can leave the doors wide open to the streets and they seem to be far less at risk of break-in than places where I have to religiously lock the doors when not there or have other security measures in place and on display for potential criminals. The former tend to be where ordinary civilians can lawfully shoot at home-violating thieves of sorts upon warning and are more likely to possess a legal firearm, while the latter tend to be in places where ordinary civilians can't and/or are way less likely to possess a legal firearm.

Says the person blaming Marriott, at least in part, for the data breach hits. Marriott, and Starwood before it, are indeed getting blamed in part for this incident, but there are reasons that Marriott/Starwood are held to a different standard than an adult kid living in their momma's basement because the adult kid got fleeced at an online casino.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 4:30 am
  #358  
Moderator, El Al and Marriott Bonvoy, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SIN
Programs: SQ*G, Mar LTT, Hyatt Glb, AA LTG, LY, HH, IC, BA, DL, UA SLV
Posts: 12,018
Moderator Note

Folks,
Please keep this thread on the relevant issues of the breach, how to address it, how Marriott is addressing it, etc. This isn't a thread for general security topics which can be addressed elsewhere in FlyerTalk.

Thanks,
yosithezet
Co-Moderator, MSR Forum
yosithezet is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 5:02 am
  #359  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: lounge next door
Programs: *A Gold / ST Elite+ / OWS / EK G / HH Diam. / MR Tit / Hyatt GLOB / IHG Diam. / SL Jade / GHA Tit.
Posts: 1,523
Originally Posted by GUWonder


It seems to me that so far most people still haven’t gotten any Marriott email about this matter. Many of the people who are covered by GDPR also seem to not have gotten any such email from Marriott. And I’m having the spam folders checked.
I asked the Marriott privacy officer what is the contact of their EU representative for GDPR... still waiting for an answer.
When I got one I will share here for us to be able to fill claims.
EuropeanPete, KRSW and remymartin like this.
frenchft is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2018, 5:23 am
  #360  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by frenchft
I asked the Marriott privacy officer what is the contact of their EU representative for GDPR... still waiting for an answer.
When I got one I will share here for us to be able to fill claims.
I doubt that Marriott had one, although Marriott has plenty of lawyers on hire in the EU too. Maybe Marriott has even told its area lawyers to hold back and give the lead to a quasi-PR firm, as the Marriott website indicates: https://answers.kroll.com/

Even the way the data breach is being referred to by Marriott and Kroll smacks of PR spin driving the show more than just an interest in legal/regulatory compliance and supporting customers with customer privacy problems arising from the Marriott data breach/breaches indicated in Marriott's and Kroll's announcements on the matter.

Maybe you should try to contact Kroll's public face for its North American "data breach notification practice" and ask him for his EU-area equivalent.

https://www.kroll.com/en-us/how-we-h...-data-breaches
EuropeanPete likes this.

Last edited by GUWonder; Dec 5, 2018 at 5:31 am
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.