Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Marriott | Marriott Bonvoy
Reload this Page >

World of Hyatt As Alternative To SPG Platinum After Bungled Program Merger?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

World of Hyatt As Alternative To SPG Platinum After Bungled Program Merger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2018, 8:20 am
  #16  
Suspended
Marriott 25+ BadgeAman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
For those interested in luxury, I’m sorry to say that Hyatt just doesn’t measure up.

As one who has stayed at many PH (Sydney. Paris, Chicago, Aviara, Istanbul, Washington, Melbourne, Toronto) and visited several others (Vienna, Moscow, Mendoza, Milan, Siem Reap, Shanghai), stayed at a few RC (Kyoto, Boston, Ft. Lauderdale, Marina del Rey) and visited many others (Laguna Niguel, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Charlotte, Kapalua), and stayed at a ton of StR (San Francisco, NYC, Bahia Beach, Florence, Rome, Punta Mita, Bora Bora, Princeville, Mexico City, Atlanta, Houston, Washington, Lhasa, Dubai), I think I have a reasonably good perspective on the brands and pros/cons of each.

I think the rolling of the eyes at RC is unfortunate and misplaced. RC can be just as luxurious and offer just as high a service standard as PH and StR. I vastly prefer StR as just about everyone knows because of its butler service, but my recent stays at RC Kyoto and RC Boston amply demonstrate that RC can be just as good otherwise—including offering wonderful service. RC has more appropriate and locally inspired designs that offer far more sense of place than was true in the 2000s. RC even has a few high design properties (Hong Kong and Shanghai immediately come to mind) and even South Beach soon will finish its overhaul.

PH has a very clean design aesthetic, but it also can feel like Four Seasons and Ritz Carlton of old, replicating a similar contemporary and clean design ethos everywhere. It therefore can lack a sense of place, which may or may not be important to you. PH most recently has outsourced housekeeping and some other hotel services, and concomitantly can suffer by comparison with regard to service. I even experienced this issue at PH Sydney. PH also has some outdated properties in dire need of renovation (Toronto finally getting that, Aviara, Milan, and Melbourne in desperate need).

StR is the best of them all to my mind, but even StR has some weaker properties by virtue of needing renovation (Washington and Houston) or needing a service revamp (Washington and now the defunct Dubai). StR has both traditionally styled properties like NYC, Washington, Houston, Florence, Rome, Bora Bora, Atlanta, etc, as well as the modern and clean aesthetically designed contemporary properties akin to PH like San Francisco, Mexico City, Bal Harbour, Toronto, and many of those in China.

PH is generally very good, but I’ve seen a slide in service quality. Certainly, RC and StR are comparable. And there just aren’t even close to enough PH to keep me loyal to Hyatt.

And Marriott also has Luxury Collection and even a few Design Hotel properties to further increase it’s huge lead in the luxury segment, not even counting that I vastly prefer W over Andaz (or Edition).

Last edited by bhrubin; Oct 12, 2018 at 8:26 am
bhrubin is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2018, 9:05 am
  #17  
Community Director Emerita
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Anywhere warm
Posts: 33,739
Originally Posted by bhrubin
For those interested in luxury, I’m sorry to say that Hyatt just doesn’t measure up.

As someone who was top tier in Hyatt for many years during which time I was top tier in Marriott/Starwood, I am going to take a contrary view. Park Hyatts are definitely my husband's happy place. We've had amazing stays all over the world and consider it a more reliable brand than others. Further, confirmable suite upgrades meant that we were able to ensure that we had a suite for stays important to us. It's nice to know six months in advance that we will have a suite and not rely on the upgrade gods. I don't chase status now and am fortunate to have lifetime platinum premier elite with Marriott. But if I were chasing status (will all the caveats that the lesser footprint of Hyatt has to work for you), I'd go with Hyatt.
SanDiego1K is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2018, 9:22 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Programs: Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 1,780
In general, I get way better service at Hyatt brands than most Marriot/JW/Renaissance/Ritz/StR I've stayed at. Even as a mid-tier, compared to Platinum, now PPE at Marriott.

However, as someone who travels for leisure, I'm not always at a place with a Hyatt and and many of the Hyatts internationally are priced much higher compared to the local market than I can justify. So I find it very hard to get top tier with Hyatt. The biggest draw back of mid-tier with Hyatt is lack of breakfast.

I'm stick with Marriot for now since they are everywhere and often priced very resonably and I get free breakfast. With credit card, I only need 35 nights which is farily resonable.

If your stay and spending pattern allow you to qualify for Hyatt Globalist, then it's really a no brainer over Marriott.
SP03 is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2018, 9:37 am
  #19  
Suspended
Aman Contributor BadgeMarriott 25+ Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
Originally Posted by SanDiego1K
As someone who was top tier in Hyatt for many years during which time I was top tier in Marriott/Starwood, I am going to take a contrary view. Park Hyatts are definitely my husband's happy place. We've had amazing stays all over the world and consider it a more reliable brand than others. Further, confirmable suite upgrades meant that we were able to ensure that we had a suite for stays important to us. It's nice to know six months in advance that we will have a suite and not rely on the upgrade gods. I don't chase status now and am fortunate to have lifetime platinum premier elite with Marriott. But if I were chasing status (will all the caveats that the lesser footprint of Hyatt has to work for you), I'd go with Hyatt.
Thanks for that! I should have been more clear in saying that Hyatt doesn’t measure up in terms of portfolio size/footprint. Park Hyatt hotels certainly are excellent luxury hotels. My bad, as you make excellent points.

I definitely think Park Hyatt can be outstanding, as evidenced by my many recent stays. I just don’t think there are enough of them, don’t think they always provide a sense of place (they sometimes feel like they could be anywhere), and don’t like the outsourcing of housekeeping and other service lapses.

But youre absolutely right that having the 4 confirmed suite upgrades is a wonderful boon—though you can’t use those at some of the best Hyatt properties:

https://help.hyatt.com/en/hyatt-term...att-terms.html

”Suite Free Night Awards are not valid at Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Resort and Spa, Park Hyatt Maldives Hadahaa, Park Hyatt Sydney, Andaz Tokyo Toranomon Hills, Hyatt Regency Kyoto, Hyatt Regency Tulsa, Hyatt Regency Wichita, Hyatt Paris Madeleine, Hyatt Herald Square New York, Hyatt Key West Resort and Spa, Hyatt City of Dreams Manila, Hyatt Centric Santa Barbara, Hyatt Centric South Beach Miami, Spirit Ridge at NK’MIP Resort, Hyatt Rosemont, Hyatt Place hotels, or M life Rewards destinations. (These properties are referred to collectively in these Terms as the “Suite Award Ineligible Properties.”

Last edited by bhrubin; Oct 12, 2018 at 9:43 am
bhrubin is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2018, 1:40 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,101
After my experience this week with Suite Night Awards (not being confirmed even when the hotel had 3 of the suites available 24 hours out) I'm beginning to think more seriously about a focus on Hyatt for status as a LTPP...
mikeyyz is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2018, 3:18 am
  #21  
SPG 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: La Jolla, CA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, Lifetime Titanium, Delta Plat, Hilton Diamond , Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,615
Originally Posted by SanDiego1K
As someone who was top tier in Hyatt for many years during which time I was top tier in Marriott/Starwood, I am going to take a contrary view. Park Hyatts are definitely my husband's happy place. We've had amazing stays all over the world and consider it a more reliable brand than others. Further, confirmable suite upgrades meant that we were able to ensure that we had a suite for stays important to us. It's nice to know six months in advance that we will have a suite and not rely on the upgrade gods. I don't chase status now and am fortunate to have lifetime platinum premier elite with Marriott. But if I were chasing status (will all the caveats that the lesser footprint of Hyatt has to work for you), I'd go with Hyatt.
I have to agree with almost everything you say here and respectfully disagree with BHR (whom I know generally shares my hotel preferences)

When Hyatt comped me Diamond status and gifted me 8 DSUs we judiciously applied them and were very pleasantly surprised. Like SD1K it was extremely nice to be certain in advance that we had secured a Suite, without having to chance it. The Hyatt service really impressed us and 3 things especially made us happy: 1) Even though I was a newly minted Diamond, each hotel treated me like a long-standing loyal guest 2) At every check in a 4 pm check out was proactively offered to me without having to request it (something that only occasionally happens at SPG 3) Each of our hotels allowed us to have our comped breakfast as room service (something we love when we are traveling. Several hotels- Berlin comes to mind— delivered a lavish buffet-like spread.

A few hotels (Berlin & Papagayo) even upgraded us above the DSU Suite. All of the hotels gave us huge, beautiful Suites.

As loyal SPG fans we had never really tried out Hyatt before and were surprised at how favorably it compared with our beloved Starwood. In fact the few things we didn’t like about Hyatt- the fact that one couldn’t use DSUs on award stays, and the fact that award stays didn’t count toward status have been changed now. One other thing we liked (although we haven’t tried yet) is the easy way to use points for Suite upgrades. One of the worst changes from SPG to Marriott IMHO is the inability to use moderate points for guaranteed upgraded rooms.

We ended up using 7 of our 8 DSUs and 6 were outstanding experiences (Hyatt Indian Wells was a waste of DSU IMO )

Park Hyatt Tokyo
Andaz Papagayo
Andaz 5th
Andaz Amsterdam
Andaz Scottsdale
Grand Hyatt Berlin
Hyatt Indian Wells

With 18 years of amazing stays already and with Marriott’s huge footprint I have no regrets that I focused on SPG and attained LT PPE. But Hyatt is the only large chain we’ve tried that was comparable to the best of SPG.
SanDiego1K likes this.
damon88 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2018, 3:50 am
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Barcelona, London, on a plane
Programs: BA Silver, TK E+, AA PP, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 13,033
There's not really a whole lot to debate. 60 nights at Hyatt gets you more than 50/75 at the new Stariott. You can prefer certain RCs, StRs, etc. but that's for when you choose based on hotel quality, not because of loyalty programme benefits.

The downside is Hyatt's much complained-about footprint, which is precisely why they are generally more generous.
craigthemif is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.