Another pathetic cut from marriott : Make a Green Choice >> -67%
#76
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: Bonvoy Amb; AA EXP
Posts: 1,136
Wow...69 posts already about a benefit I would never think of collecting. I'm against any cuts in benefits, generally speaking. I never made the Green Choice because it should be quite obvious that it's not about environmental "green", but rather about more "green" in Marriott's pockets. I disagree with the dishonest game so many corporations play regarding environmentalism.
But posts comparing something Marriott does now, as a new merged company, to what SPG did, seems odd to me. It kind of reminds me of how former Continental customers still compare everything United does to a company that was bought and no longer exists. I suppose a mourning period is ok, but hopefully it doesn't go for years and years like the CO/UA thing. At some point, just realize customers from both sides have some wins and losses when the company merges, and it's not about how one company destroys another, but rather about what the new larger company decides to do -- and whether you still want to be a customer.
But posts comparing something Marriott does now, as a new merged company, to what SPG did, seems odd to me. It kind of reminds me of how former Continental customers still compare everything United does to a company that was bought and no longer exists. I suppose a mourning period is ok, but hopefully it doesn't go for years and years like the CO/UA thing. At some point, just realize customers from both sides have some wins and losses when the company merges, and it's not about how one company destroys another, but rather about what the new larger company decides to do -- and whether you still want to be a customer.
So that I understand, you would't choose MAGC even if the points made sense of it simply because of your stance on a specious corporate premise of environmental impact? This 500 point policy was at its core a split of economics between the hotel and the guest. In using it, there were some inconveniences (and times where my DW definitely drew the line), but the points made it worth the economic split (and whatever small incremental environmental impact was felt) and worth the time to chase the points down if not granted. Now...meh.
#77
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,720
This 500 point policy was at its core a split of economics between the hotel and the guest. In using it, there were some inconveniences (and times where my DW definitely drew the line), but the points made it worth the economic split (and whatever small incremental environmental impact was felt) and worth the time to chase the points down if not granted. Now...meh.
I find it pretty laughable that anyone who took the points is now going to reject them out of spite. If you are on board with "being green" or simply like bonus points, then you will continue to do so. If not, then clearly it was just a transaction for you and you've decided that you value the cleaning more than the points. It's no different than Southwest charging more for a higher boarding position, or Hyatt offering points instead of an in-room snack.
#78
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CLT
Programs: Marriott Plat, AA Gold
Posts: 1,076
Well if the majority of Marriott properties actually implement this (compared to the small % currently) and they actually post consistently, then quite honestly this would be an improvement for legacy MR members.
#79
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: lounge next door
Programs: *A Gold / ST Elite+ / OWS / EK G / HH Diam. / MR Tit / Hyatt GLOB / IHG Diam. / SL Jade / GHA Tit.
Posts: 1,527
Same here... she does not play or follow the point and status story and was an argument too when travelling together )))
#80
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: UA 1K 3 Million/ex-many year GS, AA PLT/2 Mil, AS MVPG, HH Dia, Starwood Life Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,401
I
I find it pretty laughable that anyone who took the points is now going to reject them out of spite. If you are on board with "being green" or simply like bonus points, then you will continue to do so. If not, then clearly it was just a transaction for you and you've decided that you value the cleaning more than the points. It's no different than Southwest charging more for a higher boarding position, or Hyatt offering points instead of an in-room snack.
I find it pretty laughable that anyone who took the points is now going to reject them out of spite. If you are on board with "being green" or simply like bonus points, then you will continue to do so. If not, then clearly it was just a transaction for you and you've decided that you value the cleaning more than the points. It's no different than Southwest charging more for a higher boarding position, or Hyatt offering points instead of an in-room snack.
#81
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: lounge next door
Programs: *A Gold / ST Elite+ / OWS / EK G / HH Diam. / MR Tit / Hyatt GLOB / IHG Diam. / SL Jade / GHA Tit.
Posts: 1,527
Was a card on the bed, "green choice" but with some marketing about being green but no compensation... and what they explain is not being green it's to help them to lower their housekeeping cost more or less with a nice marketing blabla.
So I will not be green and will ask for housekeeping tomorrow.
#82
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Here there everywhere
Programs: Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Diamond, IHG Plat, BA Silver, Aegean Gold, Aeroplan 25k, AA EXP
Posts: 2,825
Just checked in a Marriott in Europe... they have implemented... but without points )))
Was a card on the bed, "green choice" but with some marketing about being green but no compensation... and what they explain is not being green it's to help them to lower their housekeeping cost more or less with a nice marketing blabla.
So I will not be green and will ask for housekeeping tomorrow.
Was a card on the bed, "green choice" but with some marketing about being green but no compensation... and what they explain is not being green it's to help them to lower their housekeeping cost more or less with a nice marketing blabla.
So I will not be green and will ask for housekeeping tomorrow.
#83
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: lounge next door
Programs: *A Gold / ST Elite+ / OWS / EK G / HH Diam. / MR Tit / Hyatt GLOB / IHG Diam. / SL Jade / GHA Tit.
Posts: 1,527
The one I'm talking about what about how good for environment it was to skip housekeeping.
I was first thinking "ah! Marriott has already implemented the MAGC"... they did it... indeed, but the Marriott way !
#84
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Homeless
Programs: Hyatt Glob; Hilton Dia; Marriott AMB; Accor Dia; IHG Dia Amb; GHA Tit
Posts: 4,838
I feel bad for the franchised hotels in locations with high labor costs. The points are negligible compared to the labor costs of cleaning a room.
I recall that the Marriott Zurich almost begged me to accept MAGC. When I decline the offer at check in, the clerk asked if I was sure and recited statistics about the environmental impact.
I recall that the Marriott Zurich almost begged me to accept MAGC. When I decline the offer at check in, the clerk asked if I was sure and recited statistics about the environmental impact.
If the hotel does not want to be green then don't blame guests' decisions. Not to say that Marriott ZRH did, but just saying...
#85
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United Arab Emirates & Arizona, USA
Programs: UA MM/1P, EK Au, QR, TK, Marriott Life Ti, Hilton Dia, IC Dia, Hyatt Glob, Accor Pt, Shangri-La
Posts: 4,526
I suppose it's possible that they get to sit in the break room if there aren't enough rooms to clean and/or get a higher salary (or maybe a lower salary of them are now redundant) and/or clean each room more thoroughly, but I wouldn't expect these outcomes.
#86
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,342
It is still a split of economics, just a movement of $$ (points) from the customer to the corporation. No different than devaluations with SPG Amex, higher award rates, or any other reduction in benefits to the customer.
I find it pretty laughable that anyone who took the points is now going to reject them out of spite. If you are on board with "being green" or simply like bonus points, then you will continue to do so. If not, then clearly it was just a transaction for you and you've decided that you value the cleaning more than the points. It's no different than Southwest charging more for a higher boarding position, or Hyatt offering points instead of an in-room snack.
I find it pretty laughable that anyone who took the points is now going to reject them out of spite. If you are on board with "being green" or simply like bonus points, then you will continue to do so. If not, then clearly it was just a transaction for you and you've decided that you value the cleaning more than the points. It's no different than Southwest charging more for a higher boarding position, or Hyatt offering points instead of an in-room snack.
#87
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Florida
Programs: AA LTG (EXP), Hilton Silver (Dia), Marriott LTP (PP), SPG LTG (P) > MPG LTPP
Posts: 11,329
Somewhat off topic, but I don't think that participating in MAGC has any effect on the work of individual housekeepers. Presumably they work 8 (or however many) hours in a day, and clean X number of rooms in that time. If the housekeeping load were lighter, then in theory the hotel would reduce the number of housekeepers on duty. Although it's a lousy job, I am not sure that any of them want to be laid off from it because there are fewer rooms to clean each day on average.
I suppose it's possible that they get to sit in the break room if there aren't enough rooms to clean and/or get a higher salary (or maybe a lower salary of them are now redundant) and/or clean each room more thoroughly, but I wouldn't expect these outcomes.
I suppose it's possible that they get to sit in the break room if there aren't enough rooms to clean and/or get a higher salary (or maybe a lower salary of them are now redundant) and/or clean each room more thoroughly, but I wouldn't expect these outcomes.
#88
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 336
I'd say maybe 10% of my PMMR stays offered this, vs maybe 98% of my PMSPG stays.
And following that thought, if enough people stop participating in MAGC that housekeeping costs start to increase, then the program will need to increase the reward to restore the incentive.
While I get the frustration here, I agree with the sentiment that this is "on the margins" for most travelers, and I suspect the participation rate will drop only slightly, and not enough to change the incentive.
And following that thought, if enough people stop participating in MAGC that housekeeping costs start to increase, then the program will need to increase the reward to restore the incentive.
While I get the frustration here, I agree with the sentiment that this is "on the margins" for most travelers, and I suspect the participation rate will drop only slightly, and not enough to change the incentive.
If they actually do want to create change they should make a splash on the top end. All $15-20 (or equiv points), and increase property participation (for brand image), and then slowly ratchet down over time. Likely back to $5 in like 5-10 years, but now with considerable more buy-in, and actual net effect.
If they actually give a rip, that is.
#89
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,967
For me, this is something that is extra - I don't like to have my room serviced anyway and this is good for the environment.
The 500 SPG points were way too generous. I probably have earned over 150 of them the last few years. I just view it as a "good while it lasted" thing.
The 500 SPG points were way too generous. I probably have earned over 150 of them the last few years. I just view it as a "good while it lasted" thing.