![]() |
Acting ethically is an easy solution.
|
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse
(Post 10161096)
Many times a rate codes detail will NOT state your number 2; I know its there as I've seen it but I have also pulled up rate codes and there is no such statment
I've never seen #3 ever OTOH, under your contract theory, you should never be walked should you? Regarding walking, your legal analysis is incorrect. The T&Cs by which Marriot agrees to take your resevation are part of your contract and among other things details the remedies should the hotel be unable to provide you with accomodations pursuant to that contract. |
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 10162106)
Acting ethically is an easy solution.
|
Originally Posted by socrates
(Post 10164182)
Unfortunately each person's ethics vary-and it appears the variance is quite wide
|
Originally Posted by clarkef
(Post 10163791)
I'm talking specifically about rates which specify an id is required, e.g. government rate. I don't know why you've never seen #3 as I cut and pasted it from the Marriott website. Of course as three member of my immediate family are government workers I see that particular rate often.:)
Regarding walking, your legal analysis is incorrect. The T&Cs by which Marriot agrees to take your resevation are part of your contract and among other things details the remedies should the hotel be unable to provide you with accomodations pursuant to that contract. back to the walking.. now lets say that before MR Accepts my reservation requests (by giving me a conf number), I input in the comments field that you (hotel) by accepting this contract and providing me with a confirmation are agreeing not to walk me or better yet, input, you (hotel) will reimburse me rack rate (it really should work two ways here).. why wouldn't that hold up.. btw, I'm not only not a lawyer, I'm not in the legal profession either.. just curious
Originally Posted by clarkef
(Post 10163791)
I don't know why you've never seen #3 as I cut and pasted it from the Marriott website.
|
Anyone else notice that this thread got sidetracked into the same ole, same ole re: id, when the actual topic asked if anyone had gotten busted after check-out. From reading through the thread I don't think anyone has. Probably because something like that is supposed to be caught up front.
So unless anyone waves their hand & says me, me, I'd say Bruce could just merge this thread w/ one of the gazillion others re: using rates not entitled to & the ethics ;) Cheers. PS - I'm assuming based on TrojanHorse's signature above that it's the first game of USC & they're playing UVA :D |
Originally Posted by CJKatl
(Post 10158465)
A reservationist once explained to me that the corporate rate is negotiated between the company and the local property with an agreement that the company will fill a minimum number of rooms for the year. If that minimum is not met, some of the contracts require the company to pay a fee. The company would no longer get that rate in the next year, either. So I could see where an individual property may, in its own interest, want to make sure the rate is only being used by those who legitimately qualify for the rate. |
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse
(Post 10167438)
I realize you are talking about gov't rates but I thought the OP was talking about a corp rate.. sure Gov't rates have all kinds of disclaimers but the corporate ones vary quite a bit
back to the walking.. now lets say that before MR Accepts my reservation requests (by giving me a conf number), I input in the comments field that you (hotel) by accepting this contract and providing me with a confirmation are agreeing not to walk me or better yet, input, you (hotel) will reimburse me rack rate (it really should work two ways here).. why wouldn't that hold up.. btw, I'm not only not a lawyer, I'm not in the legal profession either.. just curious I still have never seen that comment and I would say its a fair guess that I at least read 95%+ of the rate details for everything I book As far as the comment about prevailing rate, I can't add anything useful. Its there. |
Originally Posted by sophiegirl
(Post 10164234)
You are too kind. I would say "and it appears that some have none."
Its amazing what some will do to save a few dollars. I do wonder what those would do if it were their company/their paycheck that was losing dollars. |
Bragging about lying and cheating?
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 6.12) T-Mobile Dash)
Originally Posted by MileageGoblin
Got carded at the Marquis last week. I showed my name badge which had my picture, name, and company symbol on it. As the name of my company wasn't on it, she requested that I show a business card or something with my name and company name on it. :td: I acquiesed and didn't complain about her asking for a 2nd ID, as I was hoping for an UG.
I think one lesson to be learned is: don't throw away previous company business cards and IDs! I plan on leaving my company within the next year, and the corporate rate that get is almost always better than the promo, elite, and w/e codes. |
Lotta people in here that are throwing stones who I'm sure are in glass houses as well as not being without sin. :rolleyes:
|
Agreed... I'm not for using corporate codes if you're not entitled to them but have any of you ever used your business' corporate code when travelling on leisure?!? That's against the rules. In fact some corporate rates even specifically speak against it (VIP rate for example). In terms of "sin" a sin is a sin is a sin...
|
Originally Posted by Mile High Club
(Post 10167919)
I've gamed the system a couple ways...
My thought is that the rate has been negotiated for both the customer's own employees and those who come into town to do business with the company, making it less expensive to do business with the company. Why else would companies have great rates at hotels near the company. Granted, my company uses the local Marriott to house out of town employees who have to come in from time to time, but my assumption is the rate is as much for our company's customers. Is that incorrect?? I don't use a corporate rate for leisure travel, but, then again, almost all my leisure travel is done on the mountain of points in my MR or HH account. |
Originally Posted by CJKatl
(Post 10175257)
You had quoted my original post. I just want to be clear that I don't think of what I'm doing as "gaming the system." I check out two rates: my company's and that of the company I'm going to do business with. I'm there at the request of and at no cost to my customer, so using the customer's rate would, IMO, be acceptable. Am I wrong about this?
My thought is that the rate has been negotiated for both the customer's own employees and those who come into town to do business with the company, making it less expensive to do business with the company. Why else would company's have great rates at hotels near the company. Granted, my company uses the local Marriott to house out of town employees who have to come in from time to time, but my assumption is the rate is as much for our company's customers. Is that incorrect?? I don't use a corporate rate for leisure travel, but, then again, almost all my leisure travel is done on the mountain of points in my MR or HH account. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:48 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.