![]() |
Originally Posted by satz
(Post 21502996)
And how does Marriott prove abuse? What if I or my spouse wanted to do a mattress run to a Courtyard hotel down the block but her or I checks in instead of the other person?
Are mattress runs against T&C for that matter? So people who engage in such practices are stealing their status? The scammers cost Marriott millions and that is ultimately picked up by investors and consumers. So, it's a good move for the honest. |
Originally Posted by joshua362
(Post 21503496)
1.I would think the "10 elite nights per meeting" and booking a conference room for an (unused) hour probably is a example of what they are getting at.
2.But stating and changing their T&C and catching and enforcing are two different matters. They probably just want to have something in case something falls into their lap... 2. Agree on both points.
Originally Posted by SiberianTiger
(Post 21503514)
I still don't get it, what abuse are they talking about, or is it just a blanket statement?
Cheers. |
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
(Post 21502926)
Not being married I don't have a dog in this hunt, but I'm confused on how 2 paid reservations with 2 valid MR#s violates T&C for a promo....
There is no problem if a couple travels together and alternates whose account is used. There is a problem if you intentionally deceive Marriott, and, according to Marriott, violate the T&Cs (asked the question, posted Marriott's answer in the other thread) in order to get certs that, if the truth were known, you wouldn't be given. Otherwise, why don't we all just use other people's MR#s and get certs for every two stays? Marriott limits those who get certs to two certs per promotion. I'm getting 55k points for 25 stays. Why shouldn't I switch promos and get a dozen certs instead? Then transfer the certs to points and move them all to my account. Instead of 55k points, I can get 250k points that way. |
Originally Posted by satz
(Post 21503359)
Are you aware that one can be added as a guest on someone's reservation without violating T&C?
The T&Cs indicate it is unacceptable. Marriott's response indicated it is unacceptable. Marriott is the sole arbiter for MRs, so there is no getting around it is unacceptable. This is different than the ten credits for CY meeting rooms, as there is no rule in the T&Cs requiring you actually have the meeting. There is a clear, straightforward rule indicating you cannot stay using someone else's MR# and you cannot get points/credits for those stays. The meeting room thing is a loophole that Marriott could choose to close, but doesn't. The cert stealing is clearly different, as it involves telling lies and intentionally breaking clear, written rules. |
Originally Posted by satz
(Post 21502996)
...Are mattress runs against T&C for that matter? So people who engage in such practices are stealing their status?
|
Originally Posted by satz
(Post 21503359)
Are you aware that one can be added as a guest on someone's reservation without violating T&C?
|
Originally Posted by joshua362
(Post 21503496)
...But stating and changing their T&C and catching and enforcing are two different matters. They probably just want to have something in case something falls into their lap...
|
And all of that is an ethical debate that can take place in Omni. ;)
Marriott tightened up its T&Cs. Since none of us work for Marriott/sat in on the meetings when they decided to do so, we have zero way of knowing if it was due to abuse, people walking away from their timeshares, elites screaming at front desk clerks (remember, there are 5 things that got tightened up) or just Marriott finally getting around to making things more clearer, something they don't do on a bunch of the other T&Cs. To me this is not a biggie. Cheers. |
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
(Post 21503971)
or just Marriott finally getting around to making things more clearer, something they don't do on a bunch of the other T&Cs.
|
Originally Posted by MaineFlyer16
(Post 21504007)
I agree...maybe they (or their lawyers) realized a clause like this was missing and wanted to add it just in case.
Cheers. |
Originally Posted by joshua362
(Post 21503496)
But stating and changing their T&C and catching and enforcing are two different matters. They probably just want to have something in case something falls into their lap...
|
I think it's pretty clear who they're aiming this at.
1) People who haven't paid their bills 2) People who continually abuse hotel staff 3) fraudulent behavior It is written in a manner that they can cancel anyone's account if they determine you're abusing the program. I don't think that this is aimed at those that book meetings; this is a well known loophole that raises revenue for Marriott. It's definitely not aimed at mattress runners, as they also produce revenue. They may be being proactive, rather than IHG's reactive cancelling of some members' accounts for making too many BRG claims. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/inter...ll-me-why.html As far as someone else staying on your account, I have coordinated with individual hotels in the past for my children to stay on rewards stays. It has never been an issue and most hotels have extended them my platinum benefits ... I didn't ask for them to extend any plat benefits. In one case, my daughter wasn't old enough (21) to be listed as an occupant of the room but one of her friends was 21, so the hotel accepted my daughter's friend's name as the primary guest. Of course all hotels had my credit card for any charges or damages. Bottom line: there are certain customers that just aren't worth the hassle as it costs more to keep the customer than to dump them. This is just a way to get rid of bad customers. Personally, I'd love it if all hotel programs banned customers who behave poorly. |
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
(Post 21504104)
Now if they could clarify some of the other T&Cs pertaining to bennies that are written loosely & can be interpreted in different ways - or actually get T&Cs in different parts of the website pertaining to the same exact thing to match we'd be good to go. But we've been asking for that for years & so far nada.
Cheers. |
Originally Posted by satz
(Post 21503359)
Are you aware that one can be added as a guest on someone's reservation without violating T&C?
|
Originally Posted by trekwars2000
(Post 21505277)
+1. I frequently add my wife or other coworker if they are going to be getting to an area before I am. I make all the hotel reservations for my small office. Of course, (other than my wife), when they get there they put their MR number and CC on the room. I've never had any issues before. In the times when my coworkers don't want to get marriott pts, I pay for the room with my CC and have them reimburse me so I can get the points (up to 3 total rooms). I don't see how this is violating the T&Cs.
The whole point here is that just like other air carriers and chains, Marriott is cracking down on the gamers. These are people who may spend money at Marriott, but ultimately are money losers. So, Marriott fires them. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:16 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.