Singapore: Sheraton or Le Meridien [Master Thread]
#16
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SEA(sia)
Posts: 5,181
Originally Posted by cawhite
I'm curious when was the last time you saw the MB branded toiletries in their standard rooms?
#17
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MSP
Programs: Hilton Gold, SPG PLAT, NWA Plat
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by steven_s
I have decided to book Sheraton, thanks for the information!
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SEA(sia)
Posts: 5,181
Originally Posted by ewj
What got you to that decision? I am a public transpo and short walking guy (vs, taxi). The Sheraton is nice but is a little off the beaten track for me.
#20
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SFO
Programs: UA1k3.00mm;AAex-EXP;Hy Glob;Acc Plt;HH Dia;Onyx Plt;Mar LT Tit;IHG DiAm;RR P;RRA G;BW D;Hcom G
Posts: 2,759
Originally Posted by bseller
Yep, 2 minutes walk if you do it very very slowly...
Best, Dave
Best, Dave
#22
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central CT
Programs: UA MM/1K, SPG Lifetime Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Diamond, HH Gold, Natl Exec Elite
Posts: 1,490
Originally Posted by mario33
Maybe you should name the INTERNATIONAL Sheratons (LC Sheratons excluded) which you rate higher than the Sheraton SIN . I am not suggesting that the Sheraton SIN is among the best Sheratons around, but it certainly isnt among the worst.
#23
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Here and there...
Posts: 1,501
Originally Posted by SportsTech
I think all 3 of the London Sheratons are better (Belgravia, Park Lane, Park Tower, yes I know the PT is LC), and I think even the Sheraton Skyline at Heathrow is in better shape: larger bathrooms, better bed, more space, better condition all around. The Sheraton Bogenhausen and Grand in Munich are both significantly better, although I'm told the Bogenhausen is missing air conditioning - it didn't affect me when I stayed there for Oktoberfest, but would be a problem in July. Westin Dublin is MUCH better than the Sheraton SIN. I could probably add another 4 or 5, but the point is that the Sheraton SIN - Starwood's flagship in an important gateway city - simply isn't competitive with the other similarly-priced hotels in Singapore, OR with other similarly positioned hotels in the Starwood chain.
All my stay at Sheraton SIN was simply great (upgrade, Platinum treatment, etc.) , and I did not have any complaints at all. The way I was treated there was actually better than at Ritz Carlton SIN...
#24
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MKE
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, AA Plat Pro, MR LTP, others from cards
Posts: 890
Originally Posted by SportsTech
I think all 3 of the London Sheratons are better (Belgravia, Park Lane, Park Tower, yes I know the PT is LC), and I think even the Sheraton Skyline at Heathrow is in better shape: larger bathrooms, better bed, more space, better condition all around. The Sheraton Bogenhausen and Grand in Munich are both significantly better, although I'm told the Bogenhausen is missing air conditioning - it didn't affect me when I stayed there for Oktoberfest, but would be a problem in July. Westin Dublin is MUCH better than the Sheraton SIN. I could probably add another 4 or 5, but the point is that the Sheraton SIN - Starwood's flagship in an important gateway city - simply isn't competitive with the other similarly-priced hotels in Singapore, OR with other similarly positioned hotels in the Starwood chain.
My only objection to the latter (other than not being right on Orchard) would be the lack of a club lounge, which is sad because other Asian SPG properties tend to have free cocktail hours and excellent breakfasts for plats. When I asked at checkin recently I was told that one would be coming next year. Maybe that will help.
#25
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SFO
Programs: United 1K 2MM / Marriott LTP
Posts: 5,071
I know a club lounge would be nice, but do we really need a club lounge when there is so much good and cheap food within one or two MRT stops of Newton? There is some better stuff too if you're willing to take a taxi. Heck there's even the Newton Circus Hawker stand within a few minutes walk. To those of you whom I travel to SIN with quite often and to my local friends, I know there are places much better than the touristy Newton Circus.
#26
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SFO
Programs: UA1k3.00mm;AAex-EXP;Hy Glob;Acc Plt;HH Dia;Onyx Plt;Mar LT Tit;IHG DiAm;RR P;RRA G;BW D;Hcom G
Posts: 2,759
I'd like a club lounge.
It would be an additional place to hang out or when you don't want to go out and get hot and sweaty just to eat.
It would be an additional place to hang out or when you don't want to go out and get hot and sweaty just to eat.
#27
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central CT
Programs: UA MM/1K, SPG Lifetime Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Diamond, HH Gold, Natl Exec Elite
Posts: 1,490
Originally Posted by ENIAC
..But no way is the Sheraton Skyline better than the Sheraton SIN.
#28
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: UA1k, AA plt, SW plt, Mar plt
Posts: 98
Evertime I go to this Sheraton, they try to say they have 'upgraded' me to one of their 5th-floor rooms. These rooms are not much of an upgrade except that they have a balcony. But I have generally been successful in asking for a non-5th floor upgrade and have had nice little 1 1/2 bath suites most times. Good luck!
#29
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SEA(sia)
Posts: 5,181
Originally Posted by SportsTech
I think all 3 of the London Sheratons are better (Belgravia, Park Lane, Park Tower, yes I know the PT is LC), and I think even the Sheraton Skyline at Heathrow is in better shape: larger bathrooms, better bed, more space, better condition all around. The Sheraton Bogenhausen and Grand in Munich are both significantly better, although I'm told the Bogenhausen is missing air conditioning - it didn't affect me when I stayed there for Oktoberfest, but would be a problem in July. Westin Dublin is MUCH better than the Sheraton SIN. I could probably add another 4 or 5, but the point is that the Sheraton SIN - Starwood's flagship in an important gateway city - simply isn't competitive with the other similarly-priced hotels in Singapore, OR with other similarly positioned hotels in the Starwood chain.
I dont know why many posters on FT tend to compare this hotel with Luxury Collection properties or luxury hotels like Ritz Carlton. Probably its due to the high room rates the hotel is charging. But this is a "standard" Sheraton, and is not meant to be a flagship property for Starwood. Its an old hotel built more than 20 years ago before Sheraton became part of Starwood; and prior to the departure of Westin Plaza and Westin Stamford, it was generally regarded as the lowest ranked Starwood property in SIN. Until the St Regis is completed, I dont think Starwood has anything close to a flagship property in this city.
#30
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Programs: UA, DL, AA, HH, SPG
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by mario33
Probably its due to the high room rates the hotel is charging.